<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;REPRESENTATIVE DUKE CUNNINGHAM AND THE WAGES OF EARMARK SIN&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/05/31/representative-duke-cunningham-and-the-wages-of-earmark-sin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/05/31/representative-duke-cunningham-and-the-wages-of-earmark-sin/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SteveAudio</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/05/31/representative-duke-cunningham-and-the-wages-of-earmark-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-720768</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveAudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/05/31/representative-duke-cunningham-and-the-wages-of-earmark-sin/#comment-720768</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Indeed, there have been many supporters of earmarks in both parties who have basically told taxpayers with questions about specific spending requests to take a hike.&lt;/i&gt;

While this may historically true, it certainly isn't during the first 6 years of the GWBush administration, when no Dem was allowed to author any amendment to anything.

That's not governing, that's hubris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Indeed, there have been many supporters of earmarks in both parties who have basically told taxpayers with questions about specific spending requests to take a hike.</i></p>
<p>While this may historically true, it certainly isn&#8217;t during the first 6 years of the GWBush administration, when no Dem was allowed to author any amendment to anything.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not governing, that&#8217;s hubris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
