<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NETNUTS RIGHTEOUS FURY A LITTLE MISPLACED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 22:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drongo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-742422</link>
		<dc:creator>Drongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-742422</guid>
		<description>"We have never had the right number of troops, the right equipment, or the right plan and our generals have gone along without objection until they retired."

That's not strictly true. Several generals objected to the initial Pentagon plan and called for many more troops to secure Iraq in the all important initial weeks after the invasion. These generals were sidelined, or pushed into retirement in favour of Rumsfelds small footprint invasion.

You get the generals you create. If you promote the yes men and fire the dissenters, sooner or later you get a bunch of yes men.

Not to mention the obvious (or at least it should be) fact that generals tend to get their position not because they are great leaders of men, but because they are good political players, and are good at playing the DoD budget game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We have never had the right number of troops, the right equipment, or the right plan and our generals have gone along without objection until they retired.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not strictly true. Several generals objected to the initial Pentagon plan and called for many more troops to secure Iraq in the all important initial weeks after the invasion. These generals were sidelined, or pushed into retirement in favour of Rumsfelds small footprint invasion.</p>
<p>You get the generals you create. If you promote the yes men and fire the dissenters, sooner or later you get a bunch of yes men.</p>
<p>Not to mention the obvious (or at least it should be) fact that generals tend to get their position not because they are great leaders of men, but because they are good political players, and are good at playing the DoD budget game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Campbell</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-741591</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-741591</guid>
		<description>I would like to thank our military leaders for the "poor" job they doing. Losing only (yes I said only!)3500 of our boys with the death toll dropping each of the last few years is quite an accomplishment - especially in view of the evil terrorist/guerilla enemy they are fighting (yes I said evil!). It speaks to the preparation and the care with which our forces operations are led. The fact that they have brought about the end of a murderous dictatorship and given two countries a chance for liberty makes me proud to be an American. Likewise, if we bail on Iraq the way we did in Vietnam, I will be ashamed to be an American. Pushing for immediate/near future withdrawal can only come from the hopelessly naive or those seeking political gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to thank our military leaders for the &#8220;poor&#8221; job they doing. Losing only (yes I said only!)3500 of our boys with the death toll dropping each of the last few years is quite an accomplishment - especially in view of the evil terrorist/guerilla enemy they are fighting (yes I said evil!). It speaks to the preparation and the care with which our forces operations are led. The fact that they have brought about the end of a murderous dictatorship and given two countries a chance for liberty makes me proud to be an American. Likewise, if we bail on Iraq the way we did in Vietnam, I will be ashamed to be an American. Pushing for immediate/near future withdrawal can only come from the hopelessly naive or those seeking political gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlyle Perry</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-740119</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlyle Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-740119</guid>
		<description>American generals have been sheep in wolves clothing for the entire Iraq war. We have been getting our asses kicked for almost five years and we should be screaming for an accounting of our leadership failures. From what you read about this war the opposition is too much for us. Our failure is due to "bad faries", not our fault. Someone referred to Pace as the parrot on Rumsfeld's shoulder. We have never had the right number of troops, the right equipment, or the right plan and our generals have gone along without objection until they retired. After retirement these stud mice became critics. we have been too kind to these losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American generals have been sheep in wolves clothing for the entire Iraq war. We have been getting our asses kicked for almost five years and we should be screaming for an accounting of our leadership failures. From what you read about this war the opposition is too much for us. Our failure is due to &#8220;bad faries&#8221;, not our fault. Someone referred to Pace as the parrot on Rumsfeld&#8217;s shoulder. We have never had the right number of troops, the right equipment, or the right plan and our generals have gone along without objection until they retired. After retirement these stud mice became critics. we have been too kind to these losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-740011</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-740011</guid>
		<description>Harry Reid, shut your big mouth and let this nation's generals do their job. Quit being a backseat driver, and quit insulting high ranking generals because you don't think we belong in Iraq. 

Harry Reid is a joke.  His antics are turning him into a point and laugh politician.  How is anyone supposed to take him serious when he spews this kind of garbage out.  It's his own reputation he is destroying, I say carry on. 19% approval rating speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Reid, shut your big mouth and let this nation&#8217;s generals do their job. Quit being a backseat driver, and quit insulting high ranking generals because you don&#8217;t think we belong in Iraq. </p>
<p>Harry Reid is a joke.  His antics are turning him into a point and laugh politician.  How is anyone supposed to take him serious when he spews this kind of garbage out.  It&#8217;s his own reputation he is destroying, I say carry on. 19% approval rating speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoconhunter</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-739849</link>
		<dc:creator>neoconhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-739849</guid>
		<description>Okay Rick, if you say Reid said it and he confirmed he said it I believe you.  But, like rightwing-nut-jobs--nutroots hear what they want to hear and dismiss off color remarks by there own as throw aways between friends.  It doesn't necessarily follow that they are lying or deliberately trying to deceive.

The same is true of you and tribe.  Like dogs that catch Frisbees you wait crouched for the Frisbee to be thrown, i.e. a liberal to say something--anything, and you chase it hoping to catch it in mid-air and bring it back trotting to your master.

Just remember it H.R. McMaster that wrote "Dereliction of Duty" and when history settles down it will be as poignant of Iraq as it was of Viet Nam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Rick, if you say Reid said it and he confirmed he said it I believe you.  But, like rightwing-nut-jobs&#8211;nutroots hear what they want to hear and dismiss off color remarks by there own as throw aways between friends.  It doesn&#8217;t necessarily follow that they are lying or deliberately trying to deceive.</p>
<p>The same is true of you and tribe.  Like dogs that catch Frisbees you wait crouched for the Frisbee to be thrown, i.e. a liberal to say something&#8211;anything, and you chase it hoping to catch it in mid-air and bring it back trotting to your master.</p>
<p>Just remember it H.R. McMaster that wrote &#8220;Dereliction of Duty&#8221; and when history settles down it will be as poignant of Iraq as it was of Viet Nam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Helgerson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-739558</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Helgerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-739558</guid>
		<description>Drongo hit the nail on the head. Military leaders have always been judged by their competence. Pace is a empty, stuffed shirt, that basically a yes-man for Rummy. He had no original thoughts, and from what I've read, thats how you climb the ladder in the Bush administration.Because Iraq has become such an unmitigated disaster, the neo-cons have assumed their bunker mentality, which requires them to attack anyone who speaks out against incompetents like Bush, Rummy, and his ventriloquist dummy pace.Politico has become a "Fox News Lite", I take what they report with a huge grain of sand. If the good people of Nevada wish to remove Senator Reid, they can do so with the voting process. The  rabid dog neo-cons can cry for his removal till their blue in the face. The hardright elements in this country have become a fringe movement. No one but the Limbaughs and their ilk pay any attention to them. To them Reid's comments were like some battle cry, how pathetic they have become. Bush is a clown, the neo-con movement died in Iraq, along with 3500 of our finest. Pace should be in Leavenworth for his stupidity, or maybe with the traitor Libby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drongo hit the nail on the head. Military leaders have always been judged by their competence. Pace is a empty, stuffed shirt, that basically a yes-man for Rummy. He had no original thoughts, and from what I&#8217;ve read, thats how you climb the ladder in the Bush administration.Because Iraq has become such an unmitigated disaster, the neo-cons have assumed their bunker mentality, which requires them to attack anyone who speaks out against incompetents like Bush, Rummy, and his ventriloquist dummy pace.Politico has become a &#8220;Fox News Lite&#8221;, I take what they report with a huge grain of sand. If the good people of Nevada wish to remove Senator Reid, they can do so with the voting process. The  rabid dog neo-cons can cry for his removal till their blue in the face. The hardright elements in this country have become a fringe movement. No one but the Limbaughs and their ilk pay any attention to them. To them Reid&#8217;s comments were like some battle cry, how pathetic they have become. Bush is a clown, the neo-con movement died in Iraq, along with 3500 of our finest. Pace should be in Leavenworth for his stupidity, or maybe with the traitor Libby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff B</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-739535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-739535</guid>
		<description>WR said "Of course Harry Reid didnâ€™t insult â€œthe troops.â€ He made a comment on the performance of one of the highest ranking military officials in this country."

So you're not insulting a group when you insult it's leadership?

What a load of BS.  

"Iâ€™m sure Peter Pace wouldnâ€™t feel compelled to hide behind soldiers when someone criticizes himâ€”why do you feel compelled to make the ludicrous claim that somehow criticizing the commanders is the same as attacking the soldiers on the ground?"

Here's the thing: If folks support the "chickenhawk" argument, and say that only those who have served in the military are justified to command the military, then it follows that only those who serve are justified to criticize.

And I don't think Sen Reid has served in the military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WR said &#8220;Of course Harry Reid didnâ€™t insult â€œthe troops.â€ He made a comment on the performance of one of the highest ranking military officials in this country.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re not insulting a group when you insult it&#8217;s leadership?</p>
<p>What a load of BS.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m sure Peter Pace wouldnâ€™t feel compelled to hide behind soldiers when someone criticizes himâ€”why do you feel compelled to make the ludicrous claim that somehow criticizing the commanders is the same as attacking the soldiers on the ground?&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing: If folks support the &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221; argument, and say that only those who have served in the military are justified to command the military, then it follows that only those who serve are justified to criticize.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think Sen Reid has served in the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drongo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-738918</link>
		<dc:creator>Drongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 07:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-738918</guid>
		<description>"You are a ninny. Criticize is one thing. Insults and name calling is quite another."

Yes, I agree. Insulting people is simply childish and shouldn't be accepted in polite society. Criticism is, of course, acceptable.

An example of criticism : "You are incompetent, I don't trust you to report facts accurately"

An example of an insult : "You are a ninny"

I assume that I would be banned pretty quickly if I called you an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are a ninny. Criticize is one thing. Insults and name calling is quite another.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I agree. Insulting people is simply childish and shouldn&#8217;t be accepted in polite society. Criticism is, of course, acceptable.</p>
<p>An example of criticism : &#8220;You are incompetent, I don&#8217;t trust you to report facts accurately&#8221;</p>
<p>An example of an insult : &#8220;You are a ninny&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume that I would be banned pretty quickly if I called you an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WR</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-738313</link>
		<dc:creator>WR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-738313</guid>
		<description>Of course Harry Reid didn't insult "the troops." He made a comment on the performance of one of the highest ranking military  officials in this country. I'm sure Peter Pace wouldn't feel compelled to hide behind soldiers when someone criticizes him -- why do you feel compelled to make the ludicrous claim that somehow criticizing the commanders is the same as attacking the soldiers on the ground?

Beyond that, this was anything but a "baseless criticism." Pace is a public official doing a highly public job -- and doing a pretty terrible job at it, if we're going to measure by results instead of sticking our heads in the sand. At what point are out elected leaders allowed express an opinion on the appointed military commanders? When the war is over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Harry Reid didn&#8217;t insult &#8220;the troops.&#8221; He made a comment on the performance of one of the highest ranking military  officials in this country. I&#8217;m sure Peter Pace wouldn&#8217;t feel compelled to hide behind soldiers when someone criticizes him &#8212; why do you feel compelled to make the ludicrous claim that somehow criticizing the commanders is the same as attacking the soldiers on the ground?</p>
<p>Beyond that, this was anything but a &#8220;baseless criticism.&#8221; Pace is a public official doing a highly public job &#8212; and doing a pretty terrible job at it, if we&#8217;re going to measure by results instead of sticking our heads in the sand. At what point are out elected leaders allowed express an opinion on the appointed military commanders? When the war is over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirius Familiaris</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/comment-page-1/#comment-738174</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirius Familiaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/06/15/netnuts-righteous-fury-a-little-misplaced/#comment-738174</guid>
		<description>WR,

Rick's point was that it's irresponsible for elected leaders to be levelling baseless criticism at American military commanders during a time of war. Unless of course you agree that our esteemed leaders should insult the troops as a way of scoring cheap political points, like Senators Lurch and Turb... err, Durbin did.

Try to avoid reading too much into things - you're liable to hurt yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WR,</p>
<p>Rick&#8217;s point was that it&#8217;s irresponsible for elected leaders to be levelling baseless criticism at American military commanders during a time of war. Unless of course you agree that our esteemed leaders should insult the troops as a way of scoring cheap political points, like Senators Lurch and Turb&#8230; err, Durbin did.</p>
<p>Try to avoid reading too much into things - you&#8217;re liable to hurt yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
