Comments on: OBAMA WILL SURRENDER MORE QUICKLY THAN HILLARY

By: YouTube Debate: Analysis and Punditry « The New Centrist

YouTube Debate: Analysis and Punditry « The New Centrist — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:26:40 +0000

[...] For other perspectives see The Guardian and Rightwing Nuthouse. [...]

By: DoorHold

DoorHold — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:26:55 +0000

“6Joe Helgerson Said:

… demonize the democrats …”

I can’t even believe you said that. There’s a term for the irrational demonization of Bush, “Bush Derangement Syndrome.” Every conservative from actors to politicians is subjected to relentless demonization. Apparently demonization is a standard tool for both sides, and apparently it works well enough.

As for the point about meeting with “enemies,” I partially agree (though there are vast differences between the countries involved and the situations we’re in then and now).

By: Joe Helgerson

Joe Helgerson — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:10:29 +0000

We negotiated with Russia in the 1980’s, Nixon flew to China, but Hillary and Obama are weak surrender monkeys because they want to negotiate with our enemies? Huh? I’m not saying kowtow to them, but whats wrong with a dialogue?Part of me thinks the gop presidential field is so weak that the only way they can win is to demonize the democrats. That didn’t work so well in 06 and I think it will work less well in 08.Bush is so low in the polls IMHO he will drag his party down with him. Also, if people think Hillary can be bullied like Kerry was in 04, that dog don’t hunt with her. The democrats have the funds, the majority of America and demonization WILL NOT WORK.

By: Rick Moran

Rick Moran — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:01:44 +0000

Your comment and link was non germane to the post.

Buh-bye.

By: ed

ed — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:59:32 +0000

Delete this too, coward. And to save you the effort, I have banned myself.

By: …gettingpaidtowatch » POLITICS/FOREIGNPOLICY: This Week’s Debate by the Democrat Candidates Reveals the Party’s Philosophical Weaknesses in Our Country’s Times of Peril

Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:37:16 +0000

[...] More from Moran at his Right Wing Nut House.Â Â Moran astutely points out the disasterous trip to Syria to meet with its terrorist paymester President Assad: the difference between genuine diplomacy and handing an opponent your head on a platter. Perhaps he should ask Nancy Pelosi, the highest ranking American leader to visit with President Bashar Assad of Syria in many years how well that kind of face to face diplomacy works. [...]

By: DoorHold

DoorHold — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:48:51 +0000

Kind of validates my opinion on those two; Obama’s not experienced enough to be Presidential material (though he appeals to voters who prefer charisma to ability), while Hillary is (though I vehemently disagree with her politics).

Where he’s naive, she’s savvy. While he speaks before thinking (then has to backtrack), she’s experienced enough to immediately spout the standard liberal gobbledygook (she can probably do it in her sleep).

By: Sirius Familiaris

Sirius Familiaris — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:00:59 +0000

No matter how much spadework was done by our diplomats and envoys, the fact is we would be giving these cutthroats exactly what they want without getting anything of substance in return.

Isn’t this exactly what happened with the bogus nuclear non-proliferation treaty that the peanut farmer negotiated with the Norkos?

Obama’s gaffe is simply reason #1,674,283 why Democrats can’t be trusted on issues of national security. They gladly kowtow to the most vile tyrants in the world and then somehow manage to convince themselves and their MSM lackeys that they’re elevating America’s status and reinforcing its leadership credentials.