<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A RESPONSE TO GLENN GREENWALD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irving V Pinkus</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-892997</link>
		<dc:creator>Irving V Pinkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-892997</guid>
		<description>Better late, than...

&lt;blockquote&gt;
re: BoB 5:26pm #8

Should soldiers be making more money? I think so! But that doesnâ€™t make defense contractors inheriently EVIL. Also, some civilian contractors actually have special forces backgrounds. If I have a contractor who is an ex-SEAL or ex-Delta, has decades of experience, and knows almost all there is to know about counterterrorism and CQB ...

Youâ€™re telling me he should be making the same, or LESS, than a kid just out of basic?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nop. GI's should be merit payed the same as they'd make as contractors, e.g. ~$30K/mo tax-free. America would never again have a war.

America may not stop its war-a-teering because it can well afford the dead &#38; wounded bodies - it most certainly will because it can't afford the cash, depending on the ROI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better late, than&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
re: BoB 5:26pm #8</p>
<p>Should soldiers be making more money? I think so! But that doesnâ€™t make defense contractors inheriently EVIL. Also, some civilian contractors actually have special forces backgrounds. If I have a contractor who is an ex-SEAL or ex-Delta, has decades of experience, and knows almost all there is to know about counterterrorism and CQB &#8230;</p>
<p>Youâ€™re telling me he should be making the same, or LESS, than a kid just out of basic?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nop. GI&#8217;s should be merit payed the same as they&#8217;d make as contractors, e.g. ~$30K/mo tax-free. America would never again have a war.</p>
<p>America may not stop its war-a-teering because it can well afford the dead &amp; wounded bodies - it most certainly will because it can&#8217;t afford the cash, depending on the ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You&#8217;re off the hook, Michelle. Now, I&#8217;m supposed to be the purveyor of hate speech. &#171; Volunteer Opinion Journal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-826800</link>
		<dc:creator>You&#8217;re off the hook, Michelle. Now, I&#8217;m supposed to be the purveyor of hate speech. &#171; Volunteer Opinion Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-826800</guid>
		<description>[...] Phoenix WomanÂ has also decided that I am a purveyor of hate speech and refers to me as Michelle Malkin&#8217;s &#8220;good friend&#8221;. I suppose she makes this allusion, because Michelle regularly gets accused of being such by the left-nuts.Â  Of course, Michelle, unlike me, gets hate mail from left-nutsÂ making lewd references toÂ her race, religion, sexual practices, etc.Â  Rick Moran and she are accused of allowing hate filled comments on her blog by readers.Â  Not that one might not slip through now and then.Â  But, they are usually on top of monitoring what is allowed as offensive comments go.Â  But, again, I am digressing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phoenix WomanÂ has also decided that I am a purveyor of hate speech and refers to me as Michelle Malkin&#8217;s &#8220;good friend&#8221;. I suppose she makes this allusion, because Michelle regularly gets accused of being such by the left-nuts.Â  Of course, Michelle, unlike me, gets hate mail from left-nutsÂ making lewd references toÂ her race, religion, sexual practices, etc.Â  Rick Moran and she are accused of allowing hate filled comments on her blog by readers.Â  Not that one might not slip through now and then.Â  But, they are usually on top of monitoring what is allowed as offensive comments go.Â  But, again, I am digressing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmirK</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-821350</link>
		<dc:creator>AmirK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-821350</guid>
		<description>Pure nonsense. The comments on Hotair has been open for years. The comments are not just "Muslims go home". They even regulraly include every kind of vile violence against Muslims -- including bombings and nuking religious sites like Mecca. And this is not just by the people who post comments on the site -- AllahPundit -- the blogger himself on the site -- has made similar statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure nonsense. The comments on Hotair has been open for years. The comments are not just &#8220;Muslims go home&#8221;. They even regulraly include every kind of vile violence against Muslims &#8212; including bombings and nuking religious sites like Mecca. And this is not just by the people who post comments on the site &#8212; AllahPundit &#8212; the blogger himself on the site &#8212; has made similar statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-820104</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-820104</guid>
		<description>" â€œMuslims go homeâ€ may prove the ignorance of the commenter but it hardly rises to the level of a hanging offense." "

Sorry? Didn't you just explain that it only need to rise to the level of violating the ToS?

Didn't you also just make a point of mocking Greenwald for redefining standards to suit his argument?

"They are borderline and perhaps my sense of their propriety would be different on another day."

What are we thinking would cross that border? Jews go home?

"Context is everything and taking a comment out of a thread and holding it up as an example of â€œhate speechâ€ is, as Greenwald himself says, unfair."

Well no, it would be unfair only if that context altered the meaning of the post.

I would hate to think that MuslimsGoHomeGuy's been unfairly portrayed as bigoted PoS here. Provide some context that put's him in a better light.

Or quit pretending comments like this are something other than what they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; â€œMuslims go homeâ€ may prove the ignorance of the commenter but it hardly rises to the level of a hanging offense.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry? Didn&#8217;t you just explain that it only need to rise to the level of violating the ToS?</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t you also just make a point of mocking Greenwald for redefining standards to suit his argument?</p>
<p>&#8220;They are borderline and perhaps my sense of their propriety would be different on another day.&#8221;</p>
<p>What are we thinking would cross that border? Jews go home?</p>
<p>&#8220;Context is everything and taking a comment out of a thread and holding it up as an example of â€œhate speechâ€ is, as Greenwald himself says, unfair.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well no, it would be unfair only if that context altered the meaning of the post.</p>
<p>I would hate to think that MuslimsGoHomeGuy&#8217;s been unfairly portrayed as bigoted PoS here. Provide some context that put&#8217;s him in a better light.</p>
<p>Or quit pretending comments like this are something other than what they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Hermit</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-820071</link>
		<dc:creator>A Hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-820071</guid>
		<description>"Some people prefer pills. If it was me, Iâ€™d get in a nice hot tub and just open the old veins.

In a pinch, you can hold your breath I supposeâ€¦"

Oh very nice; nothing hateful about that was there? You hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some people prefer pills. If it was me, Iâ€™d get in a nice hot tub and just open the old veins.</p>
<p>In a pinch, you can hold your breath I supposeâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh very nice; nothing hateful about that was there? You hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-819963</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-819963</guid>
		<description>"Muslim's go home" isn't hate speech? So I guess "Mexican's go home" is fine and "Blacks go home" is no big deal either. Of course we all know your boss is a fan of the Japanese internments, so I guess "Japanese go home" is ok too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Muslim&#8217;s go home&#8221; isn&#8217;t hate speech? So I guess &#8220;Mexican&#8217;s go home&#8221; is fine and &#8220;Blacks go home&#8221; is no big deal either. Of course we all know your boss is a fan of the Japanese internments, so I guess &#8220;Japanese go home&#8221; is ok too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idahogie</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-819900</link>
		<dc:creator>idahogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-819900</guid>
		<description>Katy (#25) -

I, like you, am a proud liberal, but you've misunderstood the disagreement here.  This started because right-wingers like O'Reilly and Malkin started calling DailyKos a hate site because of a few cherry-picked comments out of hundreds of thousands on one of the highest-traffic sites on the web.  By their own standard, O'Reilly's blog and Malkin's sites are hate sites.

However, Greenwald has explicitly said that he doesn't believe that standard (that a few deranged comments on a website qualify it as a hate site).  But I saw O'Reilly and Malkin the other night.  She might not have said outright that DailyKos was a hate site, but she did agree with O'Reilly that site owners have a responsibility to keep out the crazies, and if they don't then they should be tarred and feathered for it.

Liberals are merely applying Malkin's and O'Reilly's standards against them.  Unfortunately, as you can see from the comments here, they don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katy (#25) -</p>
<p>I, like you, am a proud liberal, but you&#8217;ve misunderstood the disagreement here.  This started because right-wingers like O&#8217;Reilly and Malkin started calling DailyKos a hate site because of a few cherry-picked comments out of hundreds of thousands on one of the highest-traffic sites on the web.  By their own standard, O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s blog and Malkin&#8217;s sites are hate sites.</p>
<p>However, Greenwald has explicitly said that he doesn&#8217;t believe that standard (that a few deranged comments on a website qualify it as a hate site).  But I saw O&#8217;Reilly and Malkin the other night.  She might not have said outright that DailyKos was a hate site, but she did agree with O&#8217;Reilly that site owners have a responsibility to keep out the crazies, and if they don&#8217;t then they should be tarred and feathered for it.</p>
<p>Liberals are merely applying Malkin&#8217;s and O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s standards against them.  Unfortunately, as you can see from the comments here, they don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymousCoward</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-819691</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymousCoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-819691</guid>
		<description>I guess your site will be categorized as a sarcastical hate site :).

But seriously, why does she hate 'moonbats' so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess your site will be categorized as a sarcastical hate site :).</p>
<p>But seriously, why does she hate &#8216;moonbats&#8217; so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-819318</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-819318</guid>
		<description>Some people prefer pills. If it was me, I'd get in a nice hot tub and just open the old veins. 

In a pinch, you can hold your breath I suppose...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people prefer pills. If it was me, I&#8217;d get in a nice hot tub and just open the old veins. </p>
<p>In a pinch, you can hold your breath I suppose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymousCoward</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/comment-page-1/#comment-819259</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymousCoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/07/26/a-response-to-glenn-greenwald/#comment-819259</guid>
		<description>Rick,

Michelle keeps on calling me a moonbat. I find that hateful. What can I do to make it stop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Michelle keeps on calling me a moonbat. I find that hateful. What can I do to make it stop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
