<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RON PAUL: PANDERER TO THE PARANOID?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PomoChristian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ron Paul Should be in an Asylum, Not Running for President</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1171288</link>
		<dc:creator>PomoChristian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ron Paul Should be in an Asylum, Not Running for President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1171288</guid>
		<description>[...] He attacts &#8216;9/11 truthers&#8217; like bees to honey, thanks to his comments suggesting the government was planning a terrorist attack on the US, in order to bring about martial law and a new fascism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He attacts &#8216;9/11 truthers&#8217; like bees to honey, thanks to his comments suggesting the government was planning a terrorist attack on the US, in order to bring about martial law and a new fascism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1054310</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1054310</guid>
		<description>Is the point of this article, then, to discredit Paul based on some of his supporters? Isn't this a "fallacy of false cause"? E.g., Ron Paul is insane because a number of his supporters are insane? By this same logic, were Ron Paul to say the sky is blue, it would be false because "conspiracy theorists" happen to agree with him. Of course you admit that some (most, actually) Paul supporters are completely rational, but the article focuses on the fringe groups, cites one angry neoconservative's response to Paul, cites the aggressive efforts to publicize Paul on the web (the only electronic media open to his supporters initially) and your own anecdotal evidence. What Exactly does this prove? That Paul attracts a wide variety of extremely passionate supporters?

And contrary to what is intimated here, Paul employs no underhanded tactics in his challenging of neoconservative ideas. We all know he speaks his mind in unequivocal terms at what is arguably neocon ground zero--Fox News.  

Why don't you attempt to discredit Paul's views on free market economics, or on the role of government as defined by the Constitution, or even on what foreign policy would best safeguard our safety and liberty in the long term? Obviously I'm a Paul supporter, but I don't object to your taking issue with the man's views. I just don't see this article as discussing anything, whatsoever, of substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the point of this article, then, to discredit Paul based on some of his supporters? Isn&#8217;t this a &#8220;fallacy of false cause&#8221;? E.g., Ron Paul is insane because a number of his supporters are insane? By this same logic, were Ron Paul to say the sky is blue, it would be false because &#8220;conspiracy theorists&#8221; happen to agree with him. Of course you admit that some (most, actually) Paul supporters are completely rational, but the article focuses on the fringe groups, cites one angry neoconservative&#8217;s response to Paul, cites the aggressive efforts to publicize Paul on the web (the only electronic media open to his supporters initially) and your own anecdotal evidence. What Exactly does this prove? That Paul attracts a wide variety of extremely passionate supporters?</p>
<p>And contrary to what is intimated here, Paul employs no underhanded tactics in his challenging of neoconservative ideas. We all know he speaks his mind in unequivocal terms at what is arguably neocon ground zero&#8211;Fox News.  </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you attempt to discredit Paul&#8217;s views on free market economics, or on the role of government as defined by the Constitution, or even on what foreign policy would best safeguard our safety and liberty in the long term? Obviously I&#8217;m a Paul supporter, but I don&#8217;t object to your taking issue with the man&#8217;s views. I just don&#8217;t see this article as discussing anything, whatsoever, of substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1042996</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1042996</guid>
		<description>#42. . .

It would rake 3000 people donating less than the maximum to give him his take from that organized event;  It woudl take the organized efforts of .001% of the country's population getting together and donating.  That is hardly a sign of anything other than having a dedicated cult following - which is also why I think ANYONE'S cash contributions are not indicative of much.  Even at only 2,000 a pop, a very small percentage of people can make a large dollarsign splash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#42. . .</p>
<p>It would rake 3000 people donating less than the maximum to give him his take from that organized event;  It woudl take the organized efforts of .001% of the country&#8217;s population getting together and donating.  That is hardly a sign of anything other than having a dedicated cult following - which is also why I think ANYONE&#8217;S cash contributions are not indicative of much.  Even at only 2,000 a pop, a very small percentage of people can make a large dollarsign splash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1042981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1042981</guid>
		<description>""Now thatâ€™s seriously funny. This guy is very well known for skewing poll results and his methods are anything but scientific. I find it ironic that you accuse RP supporters of stacking polls (without evidence) and then claim Lunzâ€™s â€œpollsâ€ to be legitimate.But of course as you said this is a conspiracy and the majority of us are nut jobs to believe as such lol.""


Isn't it AMAZING that somehow _Every single poll_ that isn't in an easily hackable or spamable format shows Paul as a "Two percenter'? THe Democrats, republicans, and independants are all working together and conspiring against Ron Paul, as well as all of the pollsters?

Occam's Razor - which is more likely - that Paul really is a "Two percenter' - or that the entirity of the country and all media organizations from Fox News, to MSNBC, to Gallup, to Pew are conspiring against him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;Now thatâ€™s seriously funny. This guy is very well known for skewing poll results and his methods are anything but scientific. I find it ironic that you accuse RP supporters of stacking polls (without evidence) and then claim Lunzâ€™s â€œpollsâ€ to be legitimate.But of course as you said this is a conspiracy and the majority of us are nut jobs to believe as such lol.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it AMAZING that somehow _Every single poll_ that isn&#8217;t in an easily hackable or spamable format shows Paul as a &#8220;Two percenter&#8217;? THe Democrats, republicans, and independants are all working together and conspiring against Ron Paul, as well as all of the pollsters?</p>
<p>Occam&#8217;s Razor - which is more likely - that Paul really is a &#8220;Two percenter&#8217; - or that the entirity of the country and all media organizations from Fox News, to MSNBC, to Gallup, to Pew are conspiring against him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1042287</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1042287</guid>
		<description>Rick did a great job with this column. I can't stand the Ron Paul spambots who act like he will correct every problem this country has. He's not a Republican, and even if he wins the nomination, which is a longshot, he will not have my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick did a great job with this column. I can&#8217;t stand the Ron Paul spambots who act like he will correct every problem this country has. He&#8217;s not a Republican, and even if he wins the nomination, which is a longshot, he will not have my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Waterglass &#187; Paulian Tactics</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1040166</link>
		<dc:creator>The Waterglass &#187; Paulian Tactics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1040166</guid>
		<description>[...] On top of his being a Truther, an isolationist after the fashion of Pat Buchanan, a not terribly good friend of Jews or Israel, Ron Paul is entirely unlikable insofar as hisÂ main group of supporters tends to be criminals, high school students, paranoid imbeciles, and general idiots.Â  He&#8217;s no Republican.Â  Hell, he&#8217;s not even Ross Perot. &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On top of his being a Truther, an isolationist after the fashion of Pat Buchanan, a not terribly good friend of Jews or Israel, Ron Paul is entirely unlikable insofar as hisÂ main group of supporters tends to be criminals, high school students, paranoid imbeciles, and general idiots.Â  He&#8217;s no Republican.Â  Hell, he&#8217;s not even Ross Perot. &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Straus</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1037351</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Straus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1037351</guid>
		<description>Man, those tin foil hat conspiracy theorist spambots sure have a lot of cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, those tin foil hat conspiracy theorist spambots sure have a lot of cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1026783</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1026783</guid>
		<description>I think this is a very poor blog. 

For starters, the trick Frank Luntz pulled using pro-war Fox News voters was so transparent that anyone with half a brain could see through that. Fox News would obviously know that Ron Paul would win their text poll again so I saw that as a big setup. For you to quote that episode as proof that Ron Paul is a fringe candidate is foolish. I can almost guarantee that Ron Paul will finish in the top 3 in New Hampshire.

Being worried about Neocons has very little to do with being anti-Jewish. At least you gave one sentence out of 20 to that fact. The main concern is endless wars where a group of elites gets rich while the rest of us have our kids go to war for them. I have no problems with Jews but am very concerned about the Republicans in charge right now (and I voted for Bush twice). Ron Paul is the only candidate with integrity that will get us out of this mess.

Next, I don't think their is anything fringe about being concerned with the loss of our national sovereignty to a bunch of internationalists. If Bush had his way, we would have 12 million illegal immigrants on their path to citizenship and another 20 million coming in. The Democrats are even worse. I guess I'm a conspiracist because I'm concerned that Texas is building a superhighway from Mexico that luckily is stopping at the borders of my home state. I guess I'm a conspiracist because I've noticed that Mexican trucks are now allowed to drive everywhere. Of course, Governor Perry is supporting Giuliani who would enforce illegal immigration very similarly to Bush. 

Here's a pretty good quote on conspiracies:
"Well there's nothing wrong to adding to a conspiracy theory when there might be a conspiracy, in fact," US House of Representative Dana Rohrabacher responded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a very poor blog. </p>
<p>For starters, the trick Frank Luntz pulled using pro-war Fox News voters was so transparent that anyone with half a brain could see through that. Fox News would obviously know that Ron Paul would win their text poll again so I saw that as a big setup. For you to quote that episode as proof that Ron Paul is a fringe candidate is foolish. I can almost guarantee that Ron Paul will finish in the top 3 in New Hampshire.</p>
<p>Being worried about Neocons has very little to do with being anti-Jewish. At least you gave one sentence out of 20 to that fact. The main concern is endless wars where a group of elites gets rich while the rest of us have our kids go to war for them. I have no problems with Jews but am very concerned about the Republicans in charge right now (and I voted for Bush twice). Ron Paul is the only candidate with integrity that will get us out of this mess.</p>
<p>Next, I don&#8217;t think their is anything fringe about being concerned with the loss of our national sovereignty to a bunch of internationalists. If Bush had his way, we would have 12 million illegal immigrants on their path to citizenship and another 20 million coming in. The Democrats are even worse. I guess I&#8217;m a conspiracist because I&#8217;m concerned that Texas is building a superhighway from Mexico that luckily is stopping at the borders of my home state. I guess I&#8217;m a conspiracist because I&#8217;ve noticed that Mexican trucks are now allowed to drive everywhere. Of course, Governor Perry is supporting Giuliani who would enforce illegal immigration very similarly to Bush. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a pretty good quote on conspiracies:<br />
&#8220;Well there&#8217;s nothing wrong to adding to a conspiracy theory when there might be a conspiracy, in fact,&#8221; US House of Representative Dana Rohrabacher responded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iconoclast421</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1026491</link>
		<dc:creator>Iconoclast421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1026491</guid>
		<description>Johnnyb you are the one with no knowledge of "balastics" if you think a shot fired to the back of the head can create that kind of damage pattern. Hate to break it to ya but a bullet to the back of the head can not blow the back of a personâ€™s head off and then leave a tiny exit wound in the forehead. You just cant grasp that can you? I dont need to give Ron Paul detractors any ammo, because they just make up whatever they want to hear. You're basically saying oswald's bullet did that damage, and that is just like saying the earth is flat. Havent you ever gone hunting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnnyb you are the one with no knowledge of &#8220;balastics&#8221; if you think a shot fired to the back of the head can create that kind of damage pattern. Hate to break it to ya but a bullet to the back of the head can not blow the back of a personâ€™s head off and then leave a tiny exit wound in the forehead. You just cant grasp that can you? I dont need to give Ron Paul detractors any ammo, because they just make up whatever they want to hear. You&#8217;re basically saying oswald&#8217;s bullet did that damage, and that is just like saying the earth is flat. Havent you ever gone hunting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnyb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-1026088</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/11/01/ron-paul-panderer-to-the-paranoid/#comment-1026088</guid>
		<description>Iconoclast, Oswald shot Kennedy from the 6th Floor of the Texas School Book Depository, you have must have no understanding of balastics if you think otherwise.  Please when shilling for Ron Paul don't mention conspiracy theories at all because Ron Paul does not believe in them, and neither do the majority of his supporters, but you give Ron Paul detractors ammo when you bring up such nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iconoclast, Oswald shot Kennedy from the 6th Floor of the Texas School Book Depository, you have must have no understanding of balastics if you think otherwise.  Please when shilling for Ron Paul don&#8217;t mention conspiracy theories at all because Ron Paul does not believe in them, and neither do the majority of his supporters, but you give Ron Paul detractors ammo when you bring up such nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
