Radio Iowa has the perplexing details on Representative Steve King’s endorsement of Fred Thompson for President.
Let’s just say that King didn’t cover himself in any glory with his announcement:
“So I’m down to, of course, Romney and Thompson and in the end I have to come down on the side of this—who am I most comfortable with on the issues that I believe in….When I se someone who believes in their core….when they make a decision, if they’re where I am philosophically….so after really, I didn’t sleep last night but I come here to the podium to tell you that I have great respect for all the candidates.”King now veers into a discussion of faith—an apparent reference to Romney’s Mormonism. King suggests no one should be denied the presidency because of their personal faith.
Now, he’s talking about “fire in his belly” and concludes with this, calling his pick, “the person who I believe destiny has called to be the president of the United States. I will be working for…Fred Thompson for president.”
He was questioned about the “fire in the belly” comment.
“I’m kind of an antidote for that,” King said.
After the event, I asked King if he had made up his mind on the spot as he was speaking this morning.
“You have great intuition,” King replied.
Romney’s people must have received some kind of heads up because they were at the press conference in force. A couple of the press in the room – most notably Mark Murray from MSNBC’s First Read – actually reported that Romney had the nod.
And the endorsements keep coming… Congressman Steve King®, one of Iowa’s most strident critics of illegal immigration and a champion of the state’s rural conservatives, has endorsed Romney.With a mere 17 days until the Iowa caucuses, King’s endorsement may resonate with conservatives in the western part of the state. King had fostered a close relationship with longshot candidate Tom Tancredo, who shares his strong anti-illegal immigration views. But speculation yesterday was that the much-revered (in some circles) congressman wanted to make a splash by endorsing one of the race’s front-runners.
King’s endorsement of Romney could serve to further the Massachusetts governor’s case against Huckabee, whom Team Romney hopes to paint as weak on immigration.
Then, the embarrassing update:
King just announced that he’s supporting Thompson. Team Romney is in the back of the room looking bewildered. They were all here, leading all the press to conclude that it was an endorsement for Romney.
I can’t believe that King made up his mind on the spot as RI reports. That’s got to be a joke, although given the confusion, not a very good one.
So realistically what does this do for Fred in Iowa? For one thing, it maintains the momentum he has enjoyed from the debate (Fred wasn’t expected to get the Des Moines Register endorsement anyway). For another, King has some clout in the western part of the state and among some very influential groups including anti-abortion and anti-illegal immigration interests.
But with 17 days to go and Fred facing an uphill fight to exceed expectations, it may be too little too late. His numbers have barely budged in the Rassmussen daily tracking poll since the debate. But starting today, Thompson begins the kind of retail campaigning that has been lacking in his Iowa and New Hampshire efforts previously. He will start a town by town bus tour from now until the Caucuses on January 3.
This is the kind of thing that voters in New Hampshire and Iowa demand of the candidates. The fact that Thompson has failed to do something similar in New Hampshire explains his dismal showing there – garnering less than 5% in all the polls now. It’s only half a joke when you can say that New Hampshirites won’t consider voting for a candidate unless they’ve shaken his hand at least twice. Iowans aren’t quite as bad but also revel in the attention of the candidates.
Right now unless lightening strikes the race and things go topsy-turvy, it appears that Fred has an excellent chance of finishing 3rd in Iowa and no higher. As much as I’d like to see Thompson in the race for a while, I just don’t think that’s going to give him the kind of boost he needs to win in South Carolina and make Florida a competitive venue for him. In short, I think it probable that Fred exits the stage probably immediately after Super Tuesday. He will be out of money and most likely in 4th or even 5th place in the delegate hunt and virtually mathematically eliminated from getting enough delegates to win.
While admittedly much can happen in a month in this race, the comeback kid at this point would appear to be McCain. He has a real shot at winning New Hampshire if he can get the independents and conservative Democrats to cross over and vote for him. And it appears that he is also starting to make a move in South Carolina – home of many active duty military and veterans. Two such victories would probably make him competitive on Super Tuesday – especially in the south and some of the larger states. In short, McCain’s potential delegate haul at this point far exceeds the possibilities for Fred. The arithmetic just isn’t there for the Tennessean.
Fred has got to hope that Romney continues his slide in Iowa and that he can somehow sneak past him for second place. That would be the kind of shocker that could turn his campaign around and give him a boost that would help in fundraising as well as his poll numbers. But he has a huge amount of ground to make up – at least 15 points in most polls – which makes a second place finish unlikely as of today.
Any way it turns out, Fred has done a service to the party by offering his articulated positions on several important issues. They are a good starting point for any candidate if they wish to be taken seriously by conservatives next November.
UPDATE
Malkin thinks that Romney’s Meet the Press performance where he was less than forthright on his immigration flip flops was a determining factor for King:
As I mentioned, Rep. King has been one of the strongest proponents of strict immigration enforcement. Looks like Mitt Romney’s Meet The Press performance yesterday–go back and read his Clintonian answer on amnesty–didn’t help. Like I said yesterday, the endorsement promises to carry much more weight with grass-roots conservatives than the left-leaning Des Moines Register’s.
1:37 pm
“exceed expectations”?
how about meet expectations?
1:59 pm
As I say in the article, finishing 3rd – which would be meeting expectations – won’t cut it.
For Thompson to have any chance at all, he must exceed expections. He can’t come in 3rd 19 points behind the winner. That does crap for him.
A second place finish would help him immensely.
Is there a reason you didn’t read this in the article? Could it be that you failed to read the entire piece?
Sorry, I don’t draw pictures on this site.
5:27 pm
As somebody who would really like to see Thompson in the Oval Office, I’ll have to say I’ve been curious about his strategy. Either he has been running for VP right from the start, or there’s some crazy like a fox defensive strategy in staying out of the media limelight.
While I prefer Thompson as Prez, I could really get along with almost any of the top GOP candidates in the job. Giuliani is a great manager, but I think Thompson’s “back in your face” style is better suited to the top post. So a Thompson/Giuliani or Giuliani/Thompson ticket would be a coin toss for me.
Romney is also a fine manager with good leadership skills, but he’s almost too nice/diplomatic for the job (face it, GWB’s aw-shucks, turn the other cheek personality hasn’t been the greatest for the GOP). This and his Olympic Games experience, does make him perfect for Sec of State though.
Hunter is virtually without skeletons in his closet, likely the reason for the media blackout on him, his conservative credentials are the purest of the bunch, and experience on the Armed Services Committee is valuable in today’s world. But without recognition outside of California and the military community, he doesn’t have much chance, so sign him on as Sec of Defense.
As for the RINOs in the bunch, McCain perennially and Huckabee newfound, they’d still be better than any combination of HildObama.
Hell, even Ron Paul could be thrown a bone and be put in charge of the OMB to bring some fiscal conservatism back to the GOP.
The leftist media like to point out that GOP voters are widely distributed across the field of candidates, implying that none of the candidates have sufficient following, I prefer to view it as none of them are disliked enough to narrow the field much further until the primary voting starts.
On the other side of the aisle, however, there are only two candidates that appear tolerable to the Dem voters, one a hawkish, admitted socialist, the other a complete rookie. When you bring in the irrelevant attributes (she’s a woman, he’s black) on top of the above factors, that likely loses a big part of the swing vote. At this point, the only viable Dem ticket is Hillary/Obama, and my bet is that more moderate/traditional Dems would rather stay home than hold their noses long enough to vote a HildObama ticket.
6:12 pm
[...] Rick Moran: Fred has got to hope that Romney continues his slide in Iowa and that he can somehow sneak past him for second place. That would be the kind of shocker that could turn his campaign around and give him a boost that would help in fundraising as well as his poll numbers. But he has a huge amount of ground to make up – at least 15 points in most polls – which makes a second place finish unlikely as of today. [...]
1:51 pm
FRED THOMPSON IS NOT A PRETENCIOUS PERSON LIKE MANY OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES I SEE SHOUTING OUT THEIR LAURELS. MR. THOMPSON IS A GENTLEMAN AND SHOULD GO FAR INTO WINNING THIS ELECTION IF HE DOESN’T FAULTER. HE WOULD REPRESENT TO AMERICANS WHAT IT REALLY IS TO HAVE FAMILY VALUES. I WILL GO FOR THAT.