<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOW&#8217;S THE TIME TO COME OUT FOR FRED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliGazette &#187; Conservative Bloggers Support Fred Thompson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1160501</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliGazette &#187; Conservative Bloggers Support Fred Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1160501</guid>
		<description>[...] In the post in which he endorses Thompson Rick writes that he doesn&#8217;t think that Thompson can win, but that&#8217;s irrelevant. He supports him nonetheless because: But enough of the strategy, why endorse Fred now if I donâ€™t think he can win? A simple matter of standing up for your guy when the chips are down and heâ€™s at his lowest explains it. The most recent polls in Florida and South Carolina have Fred in 5th place and in single digits. If ever Fred needed a boost, it is from those of us who have liked what he stands for but held back from endorsing him for one reason or another. In my case, it was between Fred and Romney. But todayâ€™s news about Romney backpedaling on his contention that Governor George Romney marched with Martin Luther King during the civil rights era is the straw that broke the camelâ€™s back. It never happened and his campaign disingenuously came out with a statement saying that Mitt was â€œspeaking figurativelyâ€ not â€œliterally.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the post in which he endorses Thompson Rick writes that he doesn&#8217;t think that Thompson can win, but that&#8217;s irrelevant. He supports him nonetheless because: But enough of the strategy, why endorse Fred now if I donâ€™t think he can win? A simple matter of standing up for your guy when the chips are down and heâ€™s at his lowest explains it. The most recent polls in Florida and South Carolina have Fred in 5th place and in single digits. If ever Fred needed a boost, it is from those of us who have liked what he stands for but held back from endorsing him for one reason or another. In my case, it was between Fred and Romney. But todayâ€™s news about Romney backpedaling on his contention that Governor George Romney marched with Martin Luther King during the civil rights era is the straw that broke the camelâ€™s back. It never happened and his campaign disingenuously came out with a statement saying that Mitt was â€œspeaking figurativelyâ€ not â€œliterally.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Black Republican</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1157475</link>
		<dc:creator>The Black Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1157475</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;â€ ... more focused and yes more energizedâ€

Not according to the â€œlazyâ€ story on politico.
Sorry, no link.&lt;/strong&gt;
Why no link? Are you too lazy too? Or do you just not want people to find out &lt;a href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3784" rel="nofollow"&gt;Politico made it all up&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>â€ &#8230; more focused and yes more energizedâ€</p>
<p>Not according to the â€œlazyâ€ story on politico.<br />
Sorry, no link.</strong><br />
Why no link? Are you too lazy too? Or do you just not want people to find out <a href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3784" rel="nofollow">Politico made it all up</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Freitas</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1153724</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Freitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1153724</guid>
		<description>Fred Storm Rising
 
For those of you, who missed the highlights of an otherwise disappointing debate in Iowa, please go to www.fred08.com. For those of you who share my affinity for the media, you will truly appreciate Fredâ€™s performance.
 
This is the kind of thing that I have been trying to articulate about Fred Thompson. He doesnâ€™t kowtow to the media and they HATE him for it! That is why despite a solid conservative record, and a very appealing style, the media has chosen to ordain Mike Huckabee â€œThe Conservative Candidateâ€ to challenge Romney.
 
But if you do consider yourself a conservative, and truly want to select a candidate who holds the same beliefs we do, than do a side by side comparison on the issues between Romney, Huckabee and Thompson. If you go to the â€œissuesâ€ section of the Fred Thompson web site there is one provided.
 
Look, I will support the candidate who gets the Republican nomination, but I am not willing to start settling just yet!
 
Fred Thompsonâ€™s campaign doesnâ€™t excite me because he has the best network, or highest paid consultants. His campaign INSPIRES ME because I have a candidate who doesnâ€™t force me to compromise my corps beliefs by casting a vote for him!
 
Romney and Huckabee with all their strong points require me to ignore issues which are near and dear to me.
 
Does anyone honestly believe that Romney would be touting his pro life/gun credentials if he was running for another term in Massachusetts?
 
Does anyone believe that Huckabee would really be tuff on crime or immigration when his record shows the opposite in Arkansas?
 
There is one conservative in this race whose record matches his rhetoric, one candidate whose presence and ability to articulate our principles makes him ideal for making our case to the nation, and that candidate is Fred Thompson.
 
I for one will not permit the media, of all things, to disregard a candidate who provides the greatest promise of a return to sound conservative governance.
 
So listen closely the next time you here someone running down Fred Thompson. You will notice that there is no mention of his policies or voting record, just the irrelevant claim that his campaign lacks â€œbuzzâ€ or â€œpizzazzâ€ or whatever adjective the media has now deemed as critical to holding the highest office in the land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Storm Rising</p>
<p>For those of you, who missed the highlights of an otherwise disappointing debate in Iowa, please go to <a href="http://www.fred08.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fred08.com</a>. For those of you who share my affinity for the media, you will truly appreciate Fredâ€™s performance.</p>
<p>This is the kind of thing that I have been trying to articulate about Fred Thompson. He doesnâ€™t kowtow to the media and they HATE him for it! That is why despite a solid conservative record, and a very appealing style, the media has chosen to ordain Mike Huckabee â€œThe Conservative Candidateâ€ to challenge Romney.</p>
<p>But if you do consider yourself a conservative, and truly want to select a candidate who holds the same beliefs we do, than do a side by side comparison on the issues between Romney, Huckabee and Thompson. If you go to the â€œissuesâ€ section of the Fred Thompson web site there is one provided.</p>
<p>Look, I will support the candidate who gets the Republican nomination, but I am not willing to start settling just yet!</p>
<p>Fred Thompsonâ€™s campaign doesnâ€™t excite me because he has the best network, or highest paid consultants. His campaign INSPIRES ME because I have a candidate who doesnâ€™t force me to compromise my corps beliefs by casting a vote for him!</p>
<p>Romney and Huckabee with all their strong points require me to ignore issues which are near and dear to me.</p>
<p>Does anyone honestly believe that Romney would be touting his pro life/gun credentials if he was running for another term in Massachusetts?</p>
<p>Does anyone believe that Huckabee would really be tuff on crime or immigration when his record shows the opposite in Arkansas?</p>
<p>There is one conservative in this race whose record matches his rhetoric, one candidate whose presence and ability to articulate our principles makes him ideal for making our case to the nation, and that candidate is Fred Thompson.</p>
<p>I for one will not permit the media, of all things, to disregard a candidate who provides the greatest promise of a return to sound conservative governance.</p>
<p>So listen closely the next time you here someone running down Fred Thompson. You will notice that there is no mention of his policies or voting record, just the irrelevant claim that his campaign lacks â€œbuzzâ€ or â€œpizzazzâ€ or whatever adjective the media has now deemed as critical to holding the highest office in the land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobKrumm.com &#187; The analytical case for Fred</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1153503</link>
		<dc:creator>BobKrumm.com &#187; The analytical case for Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1153503</guid>
		<description>[...] Beldar: Fred is the &#8220;Goldilocks Candidate.&#8221; Just Right. Pejman: &#8220;A candidate who puts substance over style&#8221; IMAO Right Wing Nut House: &#8220;Fred is real â€“ what you see is what you get. In a way, he reminds me more of Eisenhower than Reagan. Not a simple man but a transparent one.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beldar: Fred is the &#8220;Goldilocks Candidate.&#8221; Just Right. Pejman: &#8220;A candidate who puts substance over style&#8221; IMAO Right Wing Nut House: &#8220;Fred is real â€“ what you see is what you get. In a way, he reminds me more of Eisenhower than Reagan. Not a simple man but a transparent one.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarice</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1152094</link>
		<dc:creator>clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1152094</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear that Rick. But I'm shocked to learn you aren't a fine figure of a man, devilishly handsome, and have women three at a time when I'm not battling terrorists and making liberals' heads explode. 


I've always felt Fred was the most solid and straight forward of all the candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear that Rick. But I&#8217;m shocked to learn you aren&#8217;t a fine figure of a man, devilishly handsome, and have women three at a time when I&#8217;m not battling terrorists and making liberals&#8217; heads explode. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always felt Fred was the most solid and straight forward of all the candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1151839</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1151839</guid>
		<description>SLimGuy is right.

No states should be before "Super Tuesday"...none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SLimGuy is right.</p>
<p>No states should be before &#8220;Super Tuesday&#8221;&#8230;none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlimGuy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1151815</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1151815</guid>
		<description>I am well on record in that I have said for years that the concept of the first two primary states being professional king makers for the rest of the country should have been trashed years ago in favor of larger closely matched states.

Iowa gets way to much of candidate time if you look at the stats on the number of visits by all the players compared to other states they have been to.

I don't remember anyone dieing and making them king and it's long overdue for this to be the last election that occurs in.

Right now the field on the right is still so wide open that I don't think whatever happens in the first two states will have the impact it had in past years because it will still be a multi way horse race with the top position changing but the same ones likely staying near the top.

I don't think it is really going to become critical until South Carolina comes into play especially when you also consider how primary dates have been moved up and juggled.

The sad part is the big multi state primary day will possibly have voting going on with almost no visits to a lot of the states by some candidates at all or at least very few.

Iowa having a chance to do everything but watch the candidates techniques of flossing their teeth and much larger states will see a two day 15 stop whistle tour makes absolutely not a lick of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am well on record in that I have said for years that the concept of the first two primary states being professional king makers for the rest of the country should have been trashed years ago in favor of larger closely matched states.</p>
<p>Iowa gets way to much of candidate time if you look at the stats on the number of visits by all the players compared to other states they have been to.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember anyone dieing and making them king and it&#8217;s long overdue for this to be the last election that occurs in.</p>
<p>Right now the field on the right is still so wide open that I don&#8217;t think whatever happens in the first two states will have the impact it had in past years because it will still be a multi way horse race with the top position changing but the same ones likely staying near the top.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it is really going to become critical until South Carolina comes into play especially when you also consider how primary dates have been moved up and juggled.</p>
<p>The sad part is the big multi state primary day will possibly have voting going on with almost no visits to a lot of the states by some candidates at all or at least very few.</p>
<p>Iowa having a chance to do everything but watch the candidates techniques of flossing their teeth and much larger states will see a two day 15 stop whistle tour makes absolutely not a lick of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainster</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1151742</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1151742</guid>
		<description>Heh, your headline made me think you were saying "Bring out your Fred!"  Not that I have room to laugh at those rooting for distinctly underdog candidates; mine was dead and buried and they were tamping down the ground when he got up and started walking again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, your headline made me think you were saying &#8220;Bring out your Fred!&#8221;  Not that I have room to laugh at those rooting for distinctly underdog candidates; mine was dead and buried and they were tamping down the ground when he got up and started walking again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1151741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1151741</guid>
		<description>The "miracle" you speak of for Fred to win is the same direct cause which provided three liberal candidates to either lead or have led in the polls.

This is stone voter ignorance and nothing else. By all rights, those three clowns shouldn't have made it out of the gate on a republican ticket let alone lead in the polls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;miracle&#8221; you speak of for Fred to win is the same direct cause which provided three liberal candidates to either lead or have led in the polls.</p>
<p>This is stone voter ignorance and nothing else. By all rights, those three clowns shouldn&#8217;t have made it out of the gate on a republican ticket let alone lead in the polls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/comment-page-1/#comment-1151613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/20/nows-the-time-to-come-out-for-fred/#comment-1151613</guid>
		<description>Here in Iowa things are not all Huckabee. Thompson has more ground support than I myself realized. Illegal Immigration is a very hot topic around here. Huckabee can't pretend to be strong on that. I keep running into more and more people that have Fred! on their mind. Will see just how much success his bus trip will have. Jan 3rd is coming up fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Iowa things are not all Huckabee. Thompson has more ground support than I myself realized. Illegal Immigration is a very hot topic around here. Huckabee can&#8217;t pretend to be strong on that. I keep running into more and more people that have Fred! on their mind. Will see just how much success his bus trip will have. Jan 3rd is coming up fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
