<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEBATE IN SOUTH CAROLINA REVEALS GOP SCHISMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 04:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1207349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1207349</guid>
		<description>As a registered Democrat (though sometimes I wonder about that - Bush's one "success" is to  have pushed me towards a small-government type philosophy), Fred Thompson strikes me as one of two current Republican candidates (McCain being the other) that I would not only be ok with having as President, but would consider voting for.  His strong position on Federalism and granting more power to the states is for me, an attractive philosophy. That and in the debates I've seen, his position on the issues - even when I disagree - seems to come from rational thought and argument more than the other candidates who rely on fear and hate (in my admittedly biased view).

Huckabee should be the nation's official speech-giver - his public speaking skills are unparallelled, but  he should not run the country.
Frankly (at the risk of being called "soft on terror"), Giuliani scares me as a civil-liberties lover.
Romney's an insincere robot, and if his positions didn't scare me, his flip-flopping would.
I like McCain, but fear that he's just got too much baggage with the base of the party to win the nomination - though maybe they'll surprise me.

Thompson's best moment - for me - was when he was asked a question at the NH debates last weekend and seemed to wake up with a "Oh it's my turn?"  It may have reflected the stereotype of Thompson as a lazy geezer, but to me it was humanizing - he went on to answer the question thoughtfully (though I forget what it was about).  He seemed less like he'd be the nation's "Father figure" and more like a kindly "Grandfather Figure."  
To some, it may be too distant, but to me it was somehow appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a registered Democrat (though sometimes I wonder about that - Bush&#8217;s one &#8220;success&#8221; is to  have pushed me towards a small-government type philosophy), Fred Thompson strikes me as one of two current Republican candidates (McCain being the other) that I would not only be ok with having as President, but would consider voting for.  His strong position on Federalism and granting more power to the states is for me, an attractive philosophy. That and in the debates I&#8217;ve seen, his position on the issues - even when I disagree - seems to come from rational thought and argument more than the other candidates who rely on fear and hate (in my admittedly biased view).</p>
<p>Huckabee should be the nation&#8217;s official speech-giver - his public speaking skills are unparallelled, but  he should not run the country.<br />
Frankly (at the risk of being called &#8220;soft on terror&#8221;), Giuliani scares me as a civil-liberties lover.<br />
Romney&#8217;s an insincere robot, and if his positions didn&#8217;t scare me, his flip-flopping would.<br />
I like McCain, but fear that he&#8217;s just got too much baggage with the base of the party to win the nomination - though maybe they&#8217;ll surprise me.</p>
<p>Thompson&#8217;s best moment - for me - was when he was asked a question at the NH debates last weekend and seemed to wake up with a &#8220;Oh it&#8217;s my turn?&#8221;  It may have reflected the stereotype of Thompson as a lazy geezer, but to me it was humanizing - he went on to answer the question thoughtfully (though I forget what it was about).  He seemed less like he&#8217;d be the nation&#8217;s &#8220;Father figure&#8221; and more like a kindly &#8220;Grandfather Figure.&#8221;<br />
To some, it may be too distant, but to me it was somehow appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1206548</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1206548</guid>
		<description>Fred is clearly the only conservative in the race. And only a true conservative can unite this party.

What many people fail to realize is that with five contenders in the race and each getting a fair amount of votes, there likely will be no one with a majority of delegates come convention time.

Then what happens?

Will a majority get behind a backstabbing Rino like McCain? Don't think so.

Huckabee? You've got to be kidding!

Romney? Suspicious Johnny come lately to the conservative cause. Romney was against 2003 tax cuts, still believes the global warming hoax, and had a host of anti- reagan pro- abortion  comments in the 90's and more recent past. Besides he has used spurious attack ads against the other candidates.But the  real killer is that  many feel they can't trust him because he's a focus group phoney. Don't think the convention will be his. 

Guiliani? Maybe, but not if the social conservatives have their way.

That leaves only Fred. The only candidate acceptable to the three wings of the Party. In a split convention, he's the only one who could prevent a ugly floor fight and huge recrimination that would probably give the election to the dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred is clearly the only conservative in the race. And only a true conservative can unite this party.</p>
<p>What many people fail to realize is that with five contenders in the race and each getting a fair amount of votes, there likely will be no one with a majority of delegates come convention time.</p>
<p>Then what happens?</p>
<p>Will a majority get behind a backstabbing Rino like McCain? Don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Huckabee? You&#8217;ve got to be kidding!</p>
<p>Romney? Suspicious Johnny come lately to the conservative cause. Romney was against 2003 tax cuts, still believes the global warming hoax, and had a host of anti- reagan pro- abortion  comments in the 90&#8217;s and more recent past. Besides he has used spurious attack ads against the other candidates.But the  real killer is that  many feel they can&#8217;t trust him because he&#8217;s a focus group phoney. Don&#8217;t think the convention will be his. </p>
<p>Guiliani? Maybe, but not if the social conservatives have their way.</p>
<p>That leaves only Fred. The only candidate acceptable to the three wings of the Party. In a split convention, he&#8217;s the only one who could prevent a ugly floor fight and huge recrimination that would probably give the election to the dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Reece</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1205127</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Reece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1205127</guid>
		<description>Some folks just don't understand that Yankees still do not like southern folks.  It's not about race, it's about values.  I have not lost faith in Thompson and wont.  He has all that a conservative GOP candidate that I and so many others hope for. Go Fred!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some folks just don&#8217;t understand that Yankees still do not like southern folks.  It&#8217;s not about race, it&#8217;s about values.  I have not lost faith in Thompson and wont.  He has all that a conservative GOP candidate that I and so many others hope for. Go Fred!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1204815</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1204815</guid>
		<description>Wonder if the country-club Republican apparatus realize that for every election they push Centrist candidates (RINO) they are driving the Ron Paul fraction of the libertarian sect to undertake extremist approaches towards getting their way.

The Republican Party represents the coalition of fiscal conservatives, social conservatives and national defense hawks, not a small group of wealthy country-clubers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if the country-club Republican apparatus realize that for every election they push Centrist candidates (RINO) they are driving the Ron Paul fraction of the libertarian sect to undertake extremist approaches towards getting their way.</p>
<p>The Republican Party represents the coalition of fiscal conservatives, social conservatives and national defense hawks, not a small group of wealthy country-clubers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbaJ</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1204569</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbaJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1204569</guid>
		<description>God, I enjoyed the smackdown Thompson gave to Huckabee on his true liberal agenda.  It's about time someone put that sheep in wolf's clothing in his place!  Oh, happy day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I enjoyed the smackdown Thompson gave to Huckabee on his true liberal agenda.  It&#8217;s about time someone put that sheep in wolf&#8217;s clothing in his place!  Oh, happy day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1203861</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1203861</guid>
		<description>I liked Huckabee's response to questions about his raising taxes while Gov.: "No bridges fell in Arkansas."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Huckabee&#8217;s response to questions about his raising taxes while Gov.: &#8220;No bridges fell in Arkansas.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jackson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1202518</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1202518</guid>
		<description>I thought Thompson gave his usual thoughtful and reasoned responses.  The only thing new appears that people listened to what he was saying and have noticed the huge inconsistencies in what his opponents claim as opposed to their actual performance.

McCain claims to want to cut taxes but has sponsored a backdoor BTU tax that will be huge.  Probably explains his global warming assertions.  As for his not asking for earmarks this has has much credibility as his Keating claims of innocence.

Rudy appears to have nothing to say beyond 9-11.

Ron Paul proves that all you need to be in Congress is a IQ above freezing and be non violent.

I was very re assured by Mitt Romney's assertions that whenever the courts order something he will jump like a puppet no matter how outrageous or ridiculous.  This is leadership!

Thompson may not be Reagan but he will do more to put the government on the correct course than the other candidates and certainly is better than the politboro's candidates from across the aisle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Thompson gave his usual thoughtful and reasoned responses.  The only thing new appears that people listened to what he was saying and have noticed the huge inconsistencies in what his opponents claim as opposed to their actual performance.</p>
<p>McCain claims to want to cut taxes but has sponsored a backdoor BTU tax that will be huge.  Probably explains his global warming assertions.  As for his not asking for earmarks this has has much credibility as his Keating claims of innocence.</p>
<p>Rudy appears to have nothing to say beyond 9-11.</p>
<p>Ron Paul proves that all you need to be in Congress is a IQ above freezing and be non violent.</p>
<p>I was very re assured by Mitt Romney&#8217;s assertions that whenever the courts order something he will jump like a puppet no matter how outrageous or ridiculous.  This is leadership!</p>
<p>Thompson may not be Reagan but he will do more to put the government on the correct course than the other candidates and certainly is better than the politboro&#8217;s candidates from across the aisle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doubleplusundead</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/comment-page-1/#comment-1202471</link>
		<dc:creator>doubleplusundead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/10/debate-in-south-carolina-reveals-gop-schisms/#comment-1202471</guid>
		<description>Go Fred!  I think he has time, its not gonna be easy, but its gotta happen, he's the best shot we have at preserving the coalition and winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Fred!  I think he has time, its not gonna be easy, but its gotta happen, he&#8217;s the best shot we have at preserving the coalition and winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
