<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CLINTON&#8217;S DELEGATE GAMBIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1244696</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1244696</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sunday Links...&lt;/strong&gt;

A new psychiatric disorder: PNYTTSDWhen government runs medical care. Captain EdProf. B. wonders about RomneyThose idealistic students...except when it comes to their personal comfort. For Gaia, they should turn off all of the heat, too, and let them d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sunday Links&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A new psychiatric disorder: PNYTTSDWhen government runs medical care. Captain EdProf. B. wonders about RomneyThose idealistic students&#8230;except when it comes to their personal comfort. For Gaia, they should turn off all of the heat, too, and let them d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Paxety</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1244429</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Paxety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1244429</guid>
		<description>Additionally, several unions are actively campaigning for Hillery here in Florida.  The candidates are following their promises to not campaign here, but their supporters apparently think they can campaign without running afoul.
http://paxety.com/2008/01/24/the-fix-continues/

I've long believed that the Clinton plan was to win Michigan and Florida, then hold those delegates in reserve until needed at the convention.  And what will Obama supporters think about this, and what will they do in November if they feel cheated by Hillary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, several unions are actively campaigning for Hillery here in Florida.  The candidates are following their promises to not campaign here, but their supporters apparently think they can campaign without running afoul.<br />
<a href="http://paxety.com/2008/01/24/the-fix-continues/" rel="nofollow">http://paxety.com/2008/01/24/the-fix-continues/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long believed that the Clinton plan was to win Michigan and Florida, then hold those delegates in reserve until needed at the convention.  And what will Obama supporters think about this, and what will they do in November if they feel cheated by Hillary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 454monte.com &#187; Hillarly Clinton pulls a fast one?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242984</link>
		<dc:creator>454monte.com &#187; Hillarly Clinton pulls a fast one?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242984</guid>
		<description>[...] So the Hildabeast is showing her true colors once again? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So the Hildabeast is showing her true colors once again? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wramblin' Wreck</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242861</link>
		<dc:creator>Wramblin' Wreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242861</guid>
		<description>Rick,

I must disagree with you that this is shocking.  It is just one facet of the Clinton's "win al all costs" philosophy.  They will do whatever is necessary to win; even if it destroys the democratic party or even the country.  Just as long as they win.

On another subject, now that Fred is no longer campaigning many conservative republicans, myself included, are at a loss for a reasonable choice this November.  We would appreciate your thoughts on this.  If you have a suggestion of a choice or a direction commensurate with true conservative values it would truly be appreciated... McCain - bah, Huckabee - bah, Clinton - Bah Humbug!!  They all make Ron Paul or even Dennis Kucinich seem preferable.  If we are going to have a political, country-destroying circus, at the least make it a good circus.

How about if we were to include "none of the above" on the ballot?  If so many people dislike all of the candidates such that no one receives a plurality of the votes, then shoot all the the candidates on the ballot and start over with new ones.  Good for the economy, good for the media, good for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>I must disagree with you that this is shocking.  It is just one facet of the Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;win al all costs&#8221; philosophy.  They will do whatever is necessary to win; even if it destroys the democratic party or even the country.  Just as long as they win.</p>
<p>On another subject, now that Fred is no longer campaigning many conservative republicans, myself included, are at a loss for a reasonable choice this November.  We would appreciate your thoughts on this.  If you have a suggestion of a choice or a direction commensurate with true conservative values it would truly be appreciated&#8230; McCain - bah, Huckabee - bah, Clinton - Bah Humbug!!  They all make Ron Paul or even Dennis Kucinich seem preferable.  If we are going to have a political, country-destroying circus, at the least make it a good circus.</p>
<p>How about if we were to include &#8220;none of the above&#8221; on the ballot?  If so many people dislike all of the candidates such that no one receives a plurality of the votes, then shoot all the the candidates on the ballot and start over with new ones.  Good for the economy, good for the media, good for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Clinton: Changing The Rules On Florida And Michigan Delegates?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242728</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Clinton: Changing The Rules On Florida And Michigan Delegates?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242728</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211;Rick Moran: And now Clinton â€“ in what has to be considered a shocking display of naked power politics â€“ is seeking to change the rules in the middle of the race in order to benefit her campaign&#8230;Ultimately â€“ and this would hold true especially if the race for delegates extends beyond the primaries â€“ I doubt whether the results in Michigan and Florida will stand and the lionâ€™s share of the victories simply handed to her. But by raising the issue on the eve of the Florida primary, she lays claim to the sympathies of both state parties while putting the DNC on notice that thereâ€™s s new sheriff in town and that the rules other candidates may play by simply donâ€™t apply to the Clintonâ€™s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211;Rick Moran: And now Clinton â€“ in what has to be considered a shocking display of naked power politics â€“ is seeking to change the rules in the middle of the race in order to benefit her campaign&#8230;Ultimately â€“ and this would hold true especially if the race for delegates extends beyond the primaries â€“ I doubt whether the results in Michigan and Florida will stand and the lionâ€™s share of the victories simply handed to her. But by raising the issue on the eve of the Florida primary, she lays claim to the sympathies of both state parties while putting the DNC on notice that thereâ€™s s new sheriff in town and that the rules other candidates may play by simply donâ€™t apply to the Clintonâ€™s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Â» Your Cheating Heart</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242722</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Â» Your Cheating Heart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242722</guid>
		<description>[...] Not so fast. It suddenly appears as if the three-legged whore of Babylon, Hitlery Rotten Cankles, just cannot stand the thought of the poor voters in those states being &#8220;disenfranchised&#8221;, so now she wants their delegates re-admitted to the convention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not so fast. It suddenly appears as if the three-legged whore of Babylon, Hitlery Rotten Cankles, just cannot stand the thought of the poor voters in those states being &#8220;disenfranchised&#8221;, so now she wants their delegates re-admitted to the convention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlimGuy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242530</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242530</guid>
		<description>I have a question I have been trying to research but have not been successful so far in making a determination.

In the Republican primary in SC some independents and Dems voted since it is an open primary.

Now with a different Democrat primary in progress today are those voters who participated in the Republican primary allowed to vote again or not in the Democrat primary?

Double the voter impact?  I have not been able to find an answer yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question I have been trying to research but have not been successful so far in making a determination.</p>
<p>In the Republican primary in SC some independents and Dems voted since it is an open primary.</p>
<p>Now with a different Democrat primary in progress today are those voters who participated in the Republican primary allowed to vote again or not in the Democrat primary?</p>
<p>Double the voter impact?  I have not been able to find an answer yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlimGuy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-1242526</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/26/clintons-delegate-gambit/#comment-1242526</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly Dennis K also had his name still attached to the ballot in Michigan from some reports I read.

The restriction in Fl as I understand was on advertising or campaigning.  However I believe they were still able to do fund raising events here and some reports have shown that those events have become 'a lot larger' than historic fund raisers.

Also Bill Clinton is in the state today per one of the blogs in my RSS feed and he will likely be touting his wife's candidacy as a proxy.

There was also something in my RSS the other day about Clinton raising an issue with an Obama advertisement in Georgia reaching a few subscribers in Fl by some method on a cable system near the state line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly Dennis K also had his name still attached to the ballot in Michigan from some reports I read.</p>
<p>The restriction in Fl as I understand was on advertising or campaigning.  However I believe they were still able to do fund raising events here and some reports have shown that those events have become &#8216;a lot larger&#8217; than historic fund raisers.</p>
<p>Also Bill Clinton is in the state today per one of the blogs in my RSS feed and he will likely be touting his wife&#8217;s candidacy as a proxy.</p>
<p>There was also something in my RSS the other day about Clinton raising an issue with an Obama advertisement in Georgia reaching a few subscribers in Fl by some method on a cable system near the state line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
