napkin husks.inhibition,pilgrimages!Bonnie …

Sadly, those who suggest, as John McCain does, that “even if we are wrong we will leave our children a cleaner world” are wrong to say there is no cost. The cost comes from the finite resources available to address REAL problems, not some scheme hatched by big government/one world socialists to screw the U.S.and the West.

The economists saying that are flat wrong. There’s something called energy recycling that takes energy that would otherwise be wasted — often heat — and converts it into electricity, saving money and cutting pollution at the same time. The problem is utilities are against it — you think they want people spending LESS on their energy? — so public policy is rigged against energy recyclers.

Your comment was deleted because it was so laughably obvious you didn’t read the post that in addition to your comment being snuffed, you are banned.

Drongo:

Your comment was deleted because this was not a post about the Iraq War or the cost of it. In fact, it was an idiotic comparison given the fact the figures for global warming are annual costs while you gave the entire cost of the war over 4 years.

Great. I look forward to some Republican leadership instead of denial. Jesus will once again fail to appear and pull our nuts out of the fire. Any bettors?

Here’s an idea. Select a rich European country, find out their per capita energy usage, and then compare that with the US. What you will probably find is at least a one-third reduction in energy usage. Next, find out how they achieve this, and see if that could work here. It’s a global issue, let’s do our share technically.

Let us first talk about technical fixes, the invisible ones, where homes are better insulated, appliances are more efficient, and gas guzzler taxes support these transformations. The list goes on, if you are interested, and you must be, because if technical fixes are not adopted, then social fixes may be in the offing. And who wants those?

Seriously, there are 3 types of climahysterics. The first two are benign (the leaders want to make money, the followers are just sheeple). The third are just the newest versions of the Marxian model, doing what they came to destroy capitalism.

The Environmental Religion was built upon a varitey of sicknessess in the mind of insane people.

ABSO-frickin-LUTELY! Or that emmissions are even related. I really think many enviros know this, but are scaremongering just to promote their greenie agenda.

Why do people automatically assume we should “fight” global warming anyway? It seems to me energy independence for national security reasons is far more important.