<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE DEBATE OF ALMOST, MOSTLY, REPUBLICANS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1274154</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1274154</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing Nut House, &#8220;The Debate of Almost, Mostly, Republicans&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing Nut House, &#8220;The Debate of Almost, Mostly, Republicans&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fly-Man</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1263358</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fly-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1263358</guid>
		<description>That's precisely the problem Conservatives have just watched the last 7 years. What a joke, the notion of Conservatism as a viable political entity unto it's own. All that has happened is ridicule of the opposition and silence of criticism of Dear Leader. Conservatives haven't done anything to support their own sales pitches that got them elected. What a ruse. The denial is astounding. It's your own insignificance that is being revealed here folks nothing else. Conservative is an adjective, not a noun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s precisely the problem Conservatives have just watched the last 7 years. What a joke, the notion of Conservatism as a viable political entity unto it&#8217;s own. All that has happened is ridicule of the opposition and silence of criticism of Dear Leader. Conservatives haven&#8217;t done anything to support their own sales pitches that got them elected. What a ruse. The denial is astounding. It&#8217;s your own insignificance that is being revealed here folks nothing else. Conservative is an adjective, not a noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridgewerk</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1258600</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridgewerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1258600</guid>
		<description>Conservatives that have watched the last seven years unfold in horror have my deepest sympathy.  Our current president couldn't be more choice if he were a hand-picked liberal double-agent selected and elected to discredit the Republican Party forever.

For the Bush apologists, I welcome the return of CDS (Clinton Derangement Syndrome).  Four years of listening to your veins explode will be sweet.  I hope that Hillary Clinton develops a lisp and reverts to baby-talk during her short tenure of cleaning up the eight year Bush pile.

Only when Hillary exhorts us all to "Wuv ishamofashism" will you know how real conservatives (and everyone else on the planet) have suffered these long years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives that have watched the last seven years unfold in horror have my deepest sympathy.  Our current president couldn&#8217;t be more choice if he were a hand-picked liberal double-agent selected and elected to discredit the Republican Party forever.</p>
<p>For the Bush apologists, I welcome the return of CDS (Clinton Derangement Syndrome).  Four years of listening to your veins explode will be sweet.  I hope that Hillary Clinton develops a lisp and reverts to baby-talk during her short tenure of cleaning up the eight year Bush pile.</p>
<p>Only when Hillary exhorts us all to &#8220;Wuv ishamofashism&#8221; will you know how real conservatives (and everyone else on the planet) have suffered these long years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenLiberty</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1258343</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenLiberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1258343</guid>
		<description>When the evangelicals and neocons began to dismantle the GOP in the '80s, I said "So long. Call me when the Constitution becomes important again." Finally, in 2007 a Republican did show up amid all the RINOs. So I returned, only to discover that the first truly Republican candidate since Goldwater was despised by the media, the insider establishment, and the fearful. In short, RINOs and lovers of the corporate State.

Though McCain claims "outsider and maverick" labels, he's been part of the establishment all his adult life: Born on a naval base as the son and grandson of admirals, lived on a military bases his entire childhood, went to the Naval Academy, served a full military career, immediately ran for congress in '82 after retiring, moved on to the Senate in '86, and has been there ever since. So McCain has been a paid employee of the US government for 54 years and grew up in an elite military family before that. You can't get any more 'establishment' than John McCain.

So what if the likely GOP nominee believes in restraints on free speech, higher taxation, bigger government, open borders, and 100-year U.S. armies of occupation everywhere from Albania to Zimbabwe? Romney believes in those things too â€” at least, he does when he's in a room full of people that want him to.

In stark contrast, Ron Paul is the private sector candidate, for all those productive Americans who are sick and tired of foreign wars, Federal Reserve bubbles, the police state, and excessive taxes. Only Ron Paul speaks for freedom, peace, and prosperity. 

Without a strong economy, everything else fails as well. When Bush took office in 2001, gold was at $270/ounce. Today's price is over $900--and not because gold has become more valuable; rather, you need more dollars to buy the same amount of gold. The economic failures hitting Main St. and the suburbs will grow and only Dr. Paul is addressing this core issue in an intelligent manner.

And 'national security' conservatives, please note that when the dollar finally crashes (a la the ruble in '80s and '90s), any sense of military security will crumble as well. How many soldiers will continue to defend Iraq, Germany, or Japan when the paycheck doesn't arrive? Or behave as Russian soldiers did and sell military hardware to feed their families?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the evangelicals and neocons began to dismantle the GOP in the &#8217;80s, I said &#8220;So long. Call me when the Constitution becomes important again.&#8221; Finally, in 2007 a Republican did show up amid all the RINOs. So I returned, only to discover that the first truly Republican candidate since Goldwater was despised by the media, the insider establishment, and the fearful. In short, RINOs and lovers of the corporate State.</p>
<p>Though McCain claims &#8220;outsider and maverick&#8221; labels, he&#8217;s been part of the establishment all his adult life: Born on a naval base as the son and grandson of admirals, lived on a military bases his entire childhood, went to the Naval Academy, served a full military career, immediately ran for congress in &#8216;82 after retiring, moved on to the Senate in &#8216;86, and has been there ever since. So McCain has been a paid employee of the US government for 54 years and grew up in an elite military family before that. You can&#8217;t get any more &#8216;establishment&#8217; than John McCain.</p>
<p>So what if the likely GOP nominee believes in restraints on free speech, higher taxation, bigger government, open borders, and 100-year U.S. armies of occupation everywhere from Albania to Zimbabwe? Romney believes in those things too â€” at least, he does when he&#8217;s in a room full of people that want him to.</p>
<p>In stark contrast, Ron Paul is the private sector candidate, for all those productive Americans who are sick and tired of foreign wars, Federal Reserve bubbles, the police state, and excessive taxes. Only Ron Paul speaks for freedom, peace, and prosperity. </p>
<p>Without a strong economy, everything else fails as well. When Bush took office in 2001, gold was at $270/ounce. Today&#8217;s price is over $900&#8211;and not because gold has become more valuable; rather, you need more dollars to buy the same amount of gold. The economic failures hitting Main St. and the suburbs will grow and only Dr. Paul is addressing this core issue in an intelligent manner.</p>
<p>And &#8216;national security&#8217; conservatives, please note that when the dollar finally crashes (a la the ruble in &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s), any sense of military security will crumble as well. How many soldiers will continue to defend Iraq, Germany, or Japan when the paycheck doesn&#8217;t arrive? Or behave as Russian soldiers did and sell military hardware to feed their families?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobwire</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1256384</link>
		<dc:creator>bobwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1256384</guid>
		<description>Rick, if you see a "party that is inexorably drawn to the center" then who can you blame except Republican voters?

McCain is the best candidate to defeat any Republican, I must agree with the polls. What I fear is how much he will be swiftboated, to an extent where he is damaged overall. While I don't really imagine more Republican votes for any Democrat, if the primary becomes more tawdry, the whole slate can go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, if you see a &#8220;party that is inexorably drawn to the center&#8221; then who can you blame except Republican voters?</p>
<p>McCain is the best candidate to defeat any Republican, I must agree with the polls. What I fear is how much he will be swiftboated, to an extent where he is damaged overall. While I don&#8217;t really imagine more Republican votes for any Democrat, if the primary becomes more tawdry, the whole slate can go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1256210</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1256210</guid>
		<description>#21
OMG, Romney peeled the skin off his chicken, AND IN THE SOUTH NO LESS.  Crucify him.  Declare him unAmerican.  If there was ever a lame statement, this one is for the books.  So what if the press asked him about it?  Just because most people in the south like their chicken deep fried with lots of batter doesn't mean all of US in the south intend to load up our arteries with chicken fat.  Now we are to pick a candidate on his eating habits?

Judgemental as hell, arn't you?  Or are you just looking for anything you can bash Romney over?

Care to discuss McCain's fact finding mission to Vietnam with John Kerry where he pandered to Kerry and turned his back on American POWs, or is that too deep for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21<br />
OMG, Romney peeled the skin off his chicken, AND IN THE SOUTH NO LESS.  Crucify him.  Declare him unAmerican.  If there was ever a lame statement, this one is for the books.  So what if the press asked him about it?  Just because most people in the south like their chicken deep fried with lots of batter doesn&#8217;t mean all of US in the south intend to load up our arteries with chicken fat.  Now we are to pick a candidate on his eating habits?</p>
<p>Judgemental as hell, arn&#8217;t you?  Or are you just looking for anything you can bash Romney over?</p>
<p>Care to discuss McCain&#8217;s fact finding mission to Vietnam with John Kerry where he pandered to Kerry and turned his back on American POWs, or is that too deep for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1255967</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1255967</guid>
		<description>Reagan ran out the country-clubber class warfarers which are now firmly in the camp of Obama endorsed by billionaire Kennedy clan (he managed to raised #32 million in one month AND has billionare Oprah Winfrey)

That said a friend of mine returned from a visit to southern California a couple of weeks ago, after being away for some ten years she could not help but notice that it looks like a big garbage dump.

Oh billionaire Kennedy-clan Arnold he has have served his upper class so well, I'm glad he endorsed McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan ran out the country-clubber class warfarers which are now firmly in the camp of Obama endorsed by billionaire Kennedy clan (he managed to raised #32 million in one month AND has billionare Oprah Winfrey)</p>
<p>That said a friend of mine returned from a visit to southern California a couple of weeks ago, after being away for some ten years she could not help but notice that it looks like a big garbage dump.</p>
<p>Oh billionaire Kennedy-clan Arnold he has have served his upper class so well, I&#8217;m glad he endorsed McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Regulator</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1255806</link>
		<dc:creator>The Regulator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1255806</guid>
		<description>Where is Newt Gingrich when we need him ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Newt Gingrich when we need him ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyperIon</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1255758</link>
		<dc:creator>HyperIon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1255758</guid>
		<description>if you think that comment #23 exhibits behavior of a "gigantic....two-year old", you clearly have NEVER experienced a real 2 year old.

you know, all that misplaced vitriol could shorten your life considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you think that comment #23 exhibits behavior of a &#8220;gigantic&#8230;.two-year old&#8221;, you clearly have NEVER experienced a real 2 year old.</p>
<p>you know, all that misplaced vitriol could shorten your life considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1255727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/01/31/the-debate-of-almost-mostly-republicans/#comment-1255727</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You, know, the one I didnâ€™t delete and thus made you look like a gigantic, foot stomping, tantrum throwing two year old?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;

Really?  'Cause he posted a wiki link that was on point?  Your skin is so thin it is translucent.  This is going to be a fun election season, for me, but not for the waaaaaaaaaaahmbulance.  And the results in November will also be fun, for those of who are relishing a return to empirical thinking.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You, know, the one I didnâ€™t delete and thus made you look like a gigantic, foot stomping, tantrum throwing two year old?</i><i></p>
<p>Really?  &#8216;Cause he posted a wiki link that was on point?  Your skin is so thin it is translucent.  This is going to be a fun election season, for me, but not for the waaaaaaaaaaahmbulance.  And the results in November will also be fun, for those of who are relishing a return to empirical thinking.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
