<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE LONG MARCH BEGINS FOR CONSERVATIVES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1282004</link>
		<dc:creator>Judo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1282004</guid>
		<description>I've got to go along with the transplanted lawyer on this. Go with the hand we were given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to go along with the transplanted lawyer on this. Go with the hand we were given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transplanted Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1271843</link>
		<dc:creator>Transplanted Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1271843</guid>
		<description>Be calm, Sour-Grapes Conservatives.  Your first choice(s) are out of contention; now you have to decide whether you want a lot of the Parade of Horribles trotted out by Paul Ramsey in comment #2, or only a little bit of it.  It simply wouldn't be as bad as you're predicting under a McCain Administration.  I'm not saying McCain is a dyed-in-the-wool conservative; I'm saying he wouldn't be nearly as bad as either of the Democrats.

McCain isn't a tax-cutter, it's true.  He's a budget hawk.  Is the idea of a balanced budget really such an awful thing that the GOP can't get behind it?  McCain doesn't think that either bald eagles or illegal immigrants should be hunted for sport, but that doesn't mean that he would either open the borders or tear down our industries.  McCain is a hawk on the Iraq war, terrorism, and keeping Iran non-nuclear and under control.

No, he's not my first choice, either.  That happens in politics sometimes.  But I'll vote for him because he's the best available choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be calm, Sour-Grapes Conservatives.  Your first choice(s) are out of contention; now you have to decide whether you want a lot of the Parade of Horribles trotted out by Paul Ramsey in comment #2, or only a little bit of it.  It simply wouldn&#8217;t be as bad as you&#8217;re predicting under a McCain Administration.  I&#8217;m not saying McCain is a dyed-in-the-wool conservative; I&#8217;m saying he wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as bad as either of the Democrats.</p>
<p>McCain isn&#8217;t a tax-cutter, it&#8217;s true.  He&#8217;s a budget hawk.  Is the idea of a balanced budget really such an awful thing that the GOP can&#8217;t get behind it?  McCain doesn&#8217;t think that either bald eagles or illegal immigrants should be hunted for sport, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that he would either open the borders or tear down our industries.  McCain is a hawk on the Iraq war, terrorism, and keeping Iran non-nuclear and under control.</p>
<p>No, he&#8217;s not my first choice, either.  That happens in politics sometimes.  But I&#8217;ll vote for him because he&#8217;s the best available choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Curley</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1271568</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1271568</guid>
		<description>I'm not sacrificing principles here.  I agree with McCain on the biggest issue that most of the conservatives are bashing him over, immigration.  Campaign finance reform?  Who really votes based on that issue?  Torture?  I disagree with him, but I hope we both agree that he has more standing on that issue, having endured it himself.  Gang of 14?  I was an original member of the coalition of the chillin', and if Hillbama wins the presidency we will be awfully glad to have the filibuster for judicial nominations.  Yes, I disagree with him on drilling in ANWR, and (to a degree) on global warming.  But that's way down on my list of priorities.

But Quick's comment is the really absurd one here.  "Barbarians at the Gates"?  Isn't that the title of Kos' book?  Does any of us actually believe that Kos' crew should be running the Democratic party?  I mean, it would be wonderful for the GOP, but nobody thinks it would be great for the Democrats.

But somehow when it's the Righty Blogosphere it's different? Hey, I used to believe that, but that belief is being sorely tested by the tantrums going on for the last several weeks by the electronic wing.  I mean, Rush is telling people that Obama would be just as good on Iraq as McCain.  How delusional is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sacrificing principles here.  I agree with McCain on the biggest issue that most of the conservatives are bashing him over, immigration.  Campaign finance reform?  Who really votes based on that issue?  Torture?  I disagree with him, but I hope we both agree that he has more standing on that issue, having endured it himself.  Gang of 14?  I was an original member of the coalition of the chillin&#8217;, and if Hillbama wins the presidency we will be awfully glad to have the filibuster for judicial nominations.  Yes, I disagree with him on drilling in ANWR, and (to a degree) on global warming.  But that&#8217;s way down on my list of priorities.</p>
<p>But Quick&#8217;s comment is the really absurd one here.  &#8220;Barbarians at the Gates&#8221;?  Isn&#8217;t that the title of Kos&#8217; book?  Does any of us actually believe that Kos&#8217; crew should be running the Democratic party?  I mean, it would be wonderful for the GOP, but nobody thinks it would be great for the Democrats.</p>
<p>But somehow when it&#8217;s the Righty Blogosphere it&#8217;s different? Hey, I used to believe that, but that belief is being sorely tested by the tantrums going on for the last several weeks by the electronic wing.  I mean, Rush is telling people that Obama would be just as good on Iraq as McCain.  How delusional is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1270301</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1270301</guid>
		<description>The parallels between 1932 and 2008 are not trifling.

Hoover won the nomination with 98% of the delegates, but it would be nearly 20 years before republicans regained the WH and 60 years before the House was regained.

Start rebuilding now, all ye of conservative hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parallels between 1932 and 2008 are not trifling.</p>
<p>Hoover won the nomination with 98% of the delegates, but it would be nearly 20 years before republicans regained the WH and 60 years before the House was regained.</p>
<p>Start rebuilding now, all ye of conservative hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidney Burkett</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1270209</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidney Burkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1270209</guid>
		<description>McCain treats most all conservatives like most conservatives treat social conservatives. And everyone wondered why social cons were getting frustrated and angry just a month ago. Welcome to our world.

By the time moderates discover the damage they have done, (assuming McCain wins) it will be too late. McCain will destroy party credibility on a range of issues getting the Republican party tossed out of power for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain treats most all conservatives like most conservatives treat social conservatives. And everyone wondered why social cons were getting frustrated and angry just a month ago. Welcome to our world.</p>
<p>By the time moderates discover the damage they have done, (assuming McCain wins) it will be too late. McCain will destroy party credibility on a range of issues getting the Republican party tossed out of power for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1269984</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1269984</guid>
		<description>The truth is that a presidency of a McCain, Obama or Hillary will be a unmitigated disaster. There is nothing at this point, besides a Romney miracle that we as conservatives can do about it. 

Under any of these thre guys,there likely will be be:

â€¢ A nuclear Iran
â€¢ Possibly another terrorist strike on American Soil; definitely greater and more empowered Islamofascist terrorism.
â€¢ Much higher oil prices, more than double our inflated prices now.
â€¢ A collapsing dollar
â€¢ Higher taxes, lapsing of the 2003 cuts, new increases on the way including a 50 cent a gallon carbon tax.
â€¢ Some form of Universal Health Care
â€¢ Much greater environmental regulations - more than sufficient to strangle the economy.
â€¢ Some form of confiscation of oil, pharmaceutical and insurance industry profits.
â€¢ And as a result of all of the above - a massive recession.

Now do we as conservatives want to be apart of all the above? I don't think so. And we can't stop it even if we wanted too- which we do.

McCain cannot and will not win. The media will turn on him and absolutely destroy him as soon as he clinches the nomination. All of a sudden we will see stories of the  Keating 5, McCain tirades, stuff on his age, his intolerance, his dumb, pandering poorly thought out positions, etc, etc, etc. His squishy moderate and independent support will vanish in a heartbeat. And he will not have Talk Radio or the Blogs wathcing his back to defend him. It will be ugly.

The really sad part is that not only will the conservative base not volunteer for him, nor donate; they probably won't turn out on election day dooming a lot of good Republicans. The next Democrat President as a result, probably will have his or her way with Congress for at least the next two years.  

McCain will thus become  the biggest  loser in modern political presidential history. It will be a complete wipeout. The Republican Party will wish he did as well as Dole or Ford.

The only positive thing I can say is that the end of the  long march into the wilderness, after the carnage of the next Democrat in the White House, hopefully will be only two years away - until the 2010 Congressional elections. The US will then really need the conservatives to put the Country back togather again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is that a presidency of a McCain, Obama or Hillary will be a unmitigated disaster. There is nothing at this point, besides a Romney miracle that we as conservatives can do about it. </p>
<p>Under any of these thre guys,there likely will be be:</p>
<p>â€¢ A nuclear Iran<br />
â€¢ Possibly another terrorist strike on American Soil; definitely greater and more empowered Islamofascist terrorism.<br />
â€¢ Much higher oil prices, more than double our inflated prices now.<br />
â€¢ A collapsing dollar<br />
â€¢ Higher taxes, lapsing of the 2003 cuts, new increases on the way including a 50 cent a gallon carbon tax.<br />
â€¢ Some form of Universal Health Care<br />
â€¢ Much greater environmental regulations - more than sufficient to strangle the economy.<br />
â€¢ Some form of confiscation of oil, pharmaceutical and insurance industry profits.<br />
â€¢ And as a result of all of the above - a massive recession.</p>
<p>Now do we as conservatives want to be apart of all the above? I don&#8217;t think so. And we can&#8217;t stop it even if we wanted too- which we do.</p>
<p>McCain cannot and will not win. The media will turn on him and absolutely destroy him as soon as he clinches the nomination. All of a sudden we will see stories of the  Keating 5, McCain tirades, stuff on his age, his intolerance, his dumb, pandering poorly thought out positions, etc, etc, etc. His squishy moderate and independent support will vanish in a heartbeat. And he will not have Talk Radio or the Blogs wathcing his back to defend him. It will be ugly.</p>
<p>The really sad part is that not only will the conservative base not volunteer for him, nor donate; they probably won&#8217;t turn out on election day dooming a lot of good Republicans. The next Democrat President as a result, probably will have his or her way with Congress for at least the next two years.  </p>
<p>McCain will thus become  the biggest  loser in modern political presidential history. It will be a complete wipeout. The Republican Party will wish he did as well as Dole or Ford.</p>
<p>The only positive thing I can say is that the end of the  long march into the wilderness, after the carnage of the next Democrat in the White House, hopefully will be only two years away - until the 2010 Congressional elections. The US will then really need the conservatives to put the Country back togather again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoody</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1269958</link>
		<dc:creator>hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/02/05/the-long-march-begins-for-conservatives/#comment-1269958</guid>
		<description>Unless Billary wins the nomination.  I foresee a whole lot of expedient Republican voting simply to keep her out of office.  

I myself would vote for Ghidra the Three-Headed Monster before accepting the specter of at least another four more years of a Clinton Blight House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Billary wins the nomination.  I foresee a whole lot of expedient Republican voting simply to keep her out of office.  </p>
<p>I myself would vote for Ghidra the Three-Headed Monster before accepting the specter of at least another four more years of a Clinton Blight House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
