Comments on: McCAIN PROVING HIMSELF A CANNY CAMPAIGNER

By: PoliGazette » Former FEC Commish Brad Smith on Obama’s Federal Financing Dilemma

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:10:53 +0000

[...] I cross posted my “McCain Proving Himself a Canny Campaigner” article over at RedState and former FEC Commissioner and a great friend of bloggers Brad Smith was kind enough to respond to my argument that Obama would be crazy to forgo privately financing his campaign in the general election. [...]

By: BuffaloSoldier

BuffaloSoldier — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:55:54 +0000

Allah Option #6: Obama agrees, if McCain rejects all 527 ads. BTW: It was Obama who issue the challenge not McCain..(nice try)

YES WE CAN!

By: Thomas Jackson

Thomas Jackson — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:33:41 +0000

So McCain is so lacking in appeal he has to try to out maneiver his opponent to try and even the field since he can’t raise any where near enough to match him. Any way you cut it this just shows McCain appeal is limited to the news rooms and those contributions go to Leftists, not closet Leftists.

McCain is toast.

By: ajmontana

ajmontana — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:28:45 +0000

McCain hasnt sold me yet but at least he speaks on the issues and tells it like it is, direct contrast to the Obama buzzword blah blah blah rhetoric. Obama never voted on anything, just flaps his gums and makes speeches without any substance on what his grand plan is. McCain was by no means my choice but I probably will get behind him and hope for the best. Hillary or Obama do absolutely nothing for me.

By: Allahpunditredux

Allahpunditredux — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:27:29 +0000

I saw some talking head this morning discussing this and they seemed to think that it is a good move but more due to the likelihood that McCain can get more 527’s financed that attack Obama.
No proof of the assertion - just an observation they made.

By: tHePeOPle

tHePeOPle — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:15:52 +0000

“He must be exposed for the inexperienced, shallow thinking, ultra-liberal politician that he is.”

You keep saying this, and I keep reading the only three job requirements for president as written in the Constitution. Still can’t find anything indicating he’s not qualified for the job.

I can’t fathom why the founders would have left something so crucial as experience, conservative, or deep thinking, out of the job requirements.