<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASK LAMBCHOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: busboy33</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1363029</link>
		<dc:creator>busboy33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1363029</guid>
		<description>@CI:

"No busboy I havenâ€™t. Please provide the proof"

okay.  
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/13/eveningnews/main635966.shtml
video shows the emotional "rockstar" atmosphere the people are partaking in (granted, I'm sure you can see it as polite and respectful admiration, if you like).  First section of the text:

"There was a full-throated roar of support for President Bush at a New Mexico rally -- adoring crowds and a beaming candidate -- the stuff great political theater is made of -- and it's no accident, reports CBS New White House Correspondent Bill Plante. 

Said a rally organizer, 'I wanna hear lots of cheering in there for the president!' 

The event tickets went to busloads of pre-screened party faithful -- who poured in hours in advance -- to be greeted and organized by Bush campaign staffers. 

'We don't want anybody with a dry throat. We want you yelling for the president!' they were told." 

even FoxNews wondered about the pre-screening:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153720,00.html

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/propaganda_town_hall_meeting_invites.htm
http://www.jumpcut.com/view?id=C6B2643A23E111DC83E7000423CEF682

I've got to go to work now, so I'll try to find some more (and more recent, although he suprisingly doesn't seem to be having many town hall meetings anymore) tomorrow when I'm back.

p.s.@Casey Tompkins: not sure who ellison is, but that's a name or psuedonym I've never used.  Sorry.  My name's Mike Koughan and online I only go by busboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CI:</p>
<p>&#8220;No busboy I havenâ€™t. Please provide the proof&#8221;</p>
<p>okay.<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/13/eveningnews/main635966.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/13/eveningnews/main635966.shtml</a><br />
video shows the emotional &#8220;rockstar&#8221; atmosphere the people are partaking in (granted, I&#8217;m sure you can see it as polite and respectful admiration, if you like).  First section of the text:</p>
<p>&#8220;There was a full-throated roar of support for President Bush at a New Mexico rally &#8212; adoring crowds and a beaming candidate &#8212; the stuff great political theater is made of &#8212; and it&#8217;s no accident, reports CBS New White House Correspondent Bill Plante. </p>
<p>Said a rally organizer, &#8216;I wanna hear lots of cheering in there for the president!&#8217; </p>
<p>The event tickets went to busloads of pre-screened party faithful &#8212; who poured in hours in advance &#8212; to be greeted and organized by Bush campaign staffers. </p>
<p>&#8216;We don&#8217;t want anybody with a dry throat. We want you yelling for the president!&#8217; they were told.&#8221; </p>
<p>even FoxNews wondered about the pre-screening:<br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153720,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153720,00.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/propaganda_town_hall_meeting_invites.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/propaganda_town_hall_meeting_invites.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jumpcut.com/view?id=C6B2643A23E111DC83E7000423CEF682" rel="nofollow">http://www.jumpcut.com/view?id=C6B2643A23E111DC83E7000423CEF682</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to go to work now, so I&#8217;ll try to find some more (and more recent, although he suprisingly doesn&#8217;t seem to be having many town hall meetings anymore) tomorrow when I&#8217;m back.</p>
<p>p.s.@Casey Tompkins: not sure who ellison is, but that&#8217;s a name or psuedonym I&#8217;ve never used.  Sorry.  My name&#8217;s Mike Koughan and online I only go by busboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Tompkins</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1362324</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Tompkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1362324</guid>
		<description>That's "busboy Ellison," CI. Get it right!

{/snerk}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s &#8220;busboy Ellison,&#8221; CI. Get it right!</p>
<p>{/snerk}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitalist Infidel</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1360237</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitalist Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1360237</guid>
		<description>No busboy I haven't. Please provide the proof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No busboy I haven&#8217;t. Please provide the proof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis W. Porretto</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1360161</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis W. Porretto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1360161</guid>
		<description>To me, the Obama campaign is disturbing not so much because of the exaggerated emotional responses it draws from a substantial fraction of its adherents, but because Obama and his strategists appear to have steered their campaign deliberately into those waters. They've eschewed substantive matters in favor of the sort of weeping, fainting adulation teenaged girls once gave the Beatles...and somewhat older women gave Tom Jones, Wayne Newton, and Engelbert Humperdinck.

The first half of the Obama for President campaign, in other words, amounts to: "Love me."

If this strategy should succeed, it will have elevated its man to the highest office in the land on the strength of the sort of emotion that propels lonely women to bury themselves in Harlequin romances. It will be both principle- and policy-free. It will never have committed itself to anything -- and therefore, President Obama will be free to do anything, without fear of being accused of having gone back on his word.

The second half of the Obama for President campaign, in other words, amounts to: "Trust me."

Reflecting on that four-word platform -- could the Democratic National Convention &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;force&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Obama to commit to anything more? -- should make any mature adult shiver in his boots. It's the essence of the Cult of Personality -- a pure distillation of the force that raised Adolf Hitler to the rule of Germany, minus that nasty stuff about killing all the Jews. But how many mature adults will go to the polling places in November, if their choice is between Barack Obama and self-worshipping anti-Constitutionalist John McCain?

Pray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the Obama campaign is disturbing not so much because of the exaggerated emotional responses it draws from a substantial fraction of its adherents, but because Obama and his strategists appear to have steered their campaign deliberately into those waters. They&#8217;ve eschewed substantive matters in favor of the sort of weeping, fainting adulation teenaged girls once gave the Beatles&#8230;and somewhat older women gave Tom Jones, Wayne Newton, and Engelbert Humperdinck.</p>
<p>The first half of the Obama for President campaign, in other words, amounts to: &#8220;Love me.&#8221;</p>
<p>If this strategy should succeed, it will have elevated its man to the highest office in the land on the strength of the sort of emotion that propels lonely women to bury themselves in Harlequin romances. It will be both principle- and policy-free. It will never have committed itself to anything &#8212; and therefore, President Obama will be free to do anything, without fear of being accused of having gone back on his word.</p>
<p>The second half of the Obama for President campaign, in other words, amounts to: &#8220;Trust me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reflecting on that four-word platform &#8212; could the Democratic National Convention <b><i>force</i></b> Obama to commit to anything more? &#8212; should make any mature adult shiver in his boots. It&#8217;s the essence of the Cult of Personality &#8212; a pure distillation of the force that raised Adolf Hitler to the rule of Germany, minus that nasty stuff about killing all the Jews. But how many mature adults will go to the polling places in November, if their choice is between Barack Obama and self-worshipping anti-Constitutionalist John McCain?</p>
<p>Pray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wingnut</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1360091</link>
		<dc:creator>Wingnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1360091</guid>
		<description>Heh. What is with this leftist call to arms against Bush? He is not up for reelection. Thank God for that, by the way. He deserves a break. And Obama? Hah. Tell me one thing that is good for America that he stands for.
No one cares about issues anymore. It is all "feel good" speeches about how the rich oppress the poor. It is class warfare. It is a war in our own country and the aggressor are Socialists. Thankfully, so far anyway, it is a war with words, and not swords. But on another note, if it comes to arms, thankfully, we have more of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. What is with this leftist call to arms against Bush? He is not up for reelection. Thank God for that, by the way. He deserves a break. And Obama? Hah. Tell me one thing that is good for America that he stands for.<br />
No one cares about issues anymore. It is all &#8220;feel good&#8221; speeches about how the rich oppress the poor. It is class warfare. It is a war in our own country and the aggressor are Socialists. Thankfully, so far anyway, it is a war with words, and not swords. But on another note, if it comes to arms, thankfully, we have more of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busboy33</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1358514</link>
		<dc:creator>busboy33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1358514</guid>
		<description>"He does not engender the same fawning, fainting, chest heaving, breathless, hyper-sexual responses to his presence as Barack Obama."

Well I agree W doesn't engender a "hyper-sexual" response . . . but I haven't seen any orgies breaking out at Obama rallies either, now that I think about it.
as for the rest . . . really?  You haven't seen the hand picked rallies for the last 6 years, where Bush is asked by almost-crying-in-extacy yahoos why God is so unfair to make him stop being President?  Guess those were all doctored videos from the evil Left.  Darn that media conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He does not engender the same fawning, fainting, chest heaving, breathless, hyper-sexual responses to his presence as Barack Obama.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well I agree W doesn&#8217;t engender a &#8220;hyper-sexual&#8221; response . . . but I haven&#8217;t seen any orgies breaking out at Obama rallies either, now that I think about it.<br />
as for the rest . . . really?  You haven&#8217;t seen the hand picked rallies for the last 6 years, where Bush is asked by almost-crying-in-extacy yahoos why God is so unfair to make him stop being President?  Guess those were all doctored videos from the evil Left.  Darn that media conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Hate</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1357568</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Hate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1357568</guid>
		<description>"always interesting James Walcott"?  Maybe from a clinical point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;always interesting James Walcott&#8221;?  Maybe from a clinical point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1355126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1355126</guid>
		<description>And I thought Karl got him at PW yesterday. Best takedown of Ellers Mc Ellerson ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I thought Karl got him at PW yesterday. Best takedown of Ellers Mc Ellerson ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1355061</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1355061</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;1995 Barack Obama: Mean, Cruel Times, Christian Right - Narrow  Minded...&lt;/strong&gt;

If Lambchop wants concrete reasons I suggest he read some of Barack Obama&#8217;s rhetoric from his past: 1995 Barack Obama: Mean, Cruel Times, Christian Right - Narrow Minded - As reported by NewsBusters earlier, Michelle Obama debased America by char...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1995 Barack Obama: Mean, Cruel Times, Christian Right - Narrow  Minded&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If Lambchop wants concrete reasons I suggest he read some of Barack Obama&#8217;s rhetoric from his past: 1995 Barack Obama: Mean, Cruel Times, Christian Right - Narrow Minded - As reported by NewsBusters earlier, Michelle Obama debased America by char&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/comment-page-1/#comment-1354749</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/07/ask-lambchop/#comment-1354749</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  These leftie DFHs are all out-of-control liars and exaggerators.  Why can't they be like the Very Serious, Respectful, and Tactful conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh, BillO, and Ann Coulter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  These leftie DFHs are all out-of-control liars and exaggerators.  Why can&#8217;t they be like the Very Serious, Respectful, and Tactful conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh, BillO, and Ann Coulter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
