<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OBAMA: JUST ANOTHER LYING WEASEL OF A POLITICIAN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#171; PoliticalDerby.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1624558</link>
		<dc:creator>&#171; PoliticalDerby.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1624558</guid>
		<description>[...] The Obamas can&#8217;t say the same thing about their most recent real estate venture. The circumstances surrounding the purchase of Obama Manor don&#8217;t even come close to passing any sniff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Obamas can&#8217;t say the same thing about their most recent real estate venture. The circumstances surrounding the purchase of Obama Manor don&#8217;t even come close to passing any sniff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#171; PoliticalDerby.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1445427</link>
		<dc:creator>&#171; PoliticalDerby.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1445427</guid>
		<description>[...] money I simply don&#8217;t know what to do with. Unlike you and your husband, I didn&#8217;t have a sugar daddy to finance the purchase of my home. Neither have I (yet) written books that sold enough to pay off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] money I simply don&#8217;t know what to do with. Unlike you and your husband, I didn&#8217;t have a sugar daddy to finance the purchase of my home. Neither have I (yet) written books that sold enough to pay off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamanation</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1419951</link>
		<dc:creator>obamanation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1419951</guid>
		<description>Why Hillary is really 'staying' in the race: conspiracy theory 24070911 -

She is providing smokescreen cover for Obama and the far left.  The longer she stays in the longer she can divert attention from real issues and from real vetting of Obama.  Taking it all the way to the convention which will end up being a left wing lovefest rather than the riots 'feared' merely buys time.  This has been the strategy all along.  Serious vetting of Omama after that will be seen as desperate evil conservative, racist, and negative.  In the end, I believe a majority of voters will still have the instinct to defeat him in 43 states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Hillary is really &#8217;staying&#8217; in the race: conspiracy theory 24070911 -</p>
<p>She is providing smokescreen cover for Obama and the far left.  The longer she stays in the longer she can divert attention from real issues and from real vetting of Obama.  Taking it all the way to the convention which will end up being a left wing lovefest rather than the riots &#8216;feared&#8217; merely buys time.  This has been the strategy all along.  Serious vetting of Omama after that will be seen as desperate evil conservative, racist, and negative.  In the end, I believe a majority of voters will still have the instinct to defeat him in 43 states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey Media: Lets Take a Look At Obama&#8217;s Other Radical Friends</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1389209</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey Media: Lets Take a Look At Obama&#8217;s Other Radical Friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1389209</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, ABC is getting it off to a head start. I&#8217;ll be waiting, but not holding my breath, for the rest of the media to follow their lead. How many lies will the media overlook and ignore? Wright isn&#8217;t the only radical friend of Obama, it seems to be common company he keeps. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, ABC is getting it off to a head start. I&#8217;ll be waiting, but not holding my breath, for the rest of the media to follow their lead. How many lies will the media overlook and ignore? Wright isn&#8217;t the only radical friend of Obama, it seems to be common company he keeps. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poetryman69</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1380975</link>
		<dc:creator>poetryman69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1380975</guid>
		<description>Getting yourself pastored by a radical hater shows bad judgment.  Lying about it when asked by the media shows dishonesty.  Request for presidency denied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting yourself pastored by a radical hater shows bad judgment.  Lying about it when asked by the media shows dishonesty.  Request for presidency denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1379574</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1379574</guid>
		<description>I can be prevailed upon to drink either of the Glens as well.  And I just wrote the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can be prevailed upon to drink either of the Glens as well.  And I just wrote the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1379482</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1379482</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In fact, why arenâ€™t you doing anything to inform your fellow Obama supporters and try and bring them around to your realistic appraisal of the candidate and what he can accomplish?&lt;/i&gt;

You know what?  You're absolutely right.  I should do that.  I will.  (Probably better tomorrow, since I've been enjoying a bit of the Macallan this evening.)


&lt;em&gt;Heh. I see you prefer the single malts. My preference goes to Glenfiddich or Glenlivet - two other excellent Speyside distilleries - in a slightly chilled glass (yes, I know, blasphemy). 

Ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In fact, why arenâ€™t you doing anything to inform your fellow Obama supporters and try and bring them around to your realistic appraisal of the candidate and what he can accomplish?</i></p>
<p>You know what?  You&#8217;re absolutely right.  I should do that.  I will.  (Probably better tomorrow, since I&#8217;ve been enjoying a bit of the Macallan this evening.)</p>
<p><em>Heh. I see you prefer the single malts. My preference goes to Glenfiddich or Glenlivet - two other excellent Speyside distilleries - in a slightly chilled glass (yes, I know, blasphemy). </p>
<p>Ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1379462</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1379462</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Barack Obama is just another politician â€“ devious when he has to be, vague when it suits him, and a liar when necessity calls. May this incident involving Reverend Wright open the eyes of most of those who have lost themselves in Obamaâ€™s rhetorical fog so that they can see who and what they are supporting for President of the United States.&lt;/i&gt;

Classic straw man logic.  You assume you know what we Obama supporters see in Obama, and then inform us that we are terribly mistaken, and finally announce that we're beaten, destroyed, devastated by your overwhelming attack.  

I support Obama.  I've never thought he was anything other than a politician.  I wouldn't want him to be.  The presidency, after all, is kind of a political job.  

I support Obama for one simple reason:  he has built his campaign on the notion of reaching beyond the intellectual dead end of hyperpartisanship.  

Do I think he's Jesus come back to save us?  Um . . . no.  Do I think he's a reincarnated George Washington?  Nope.  Do I expect he'll be disappointing, as all politicians end up being?  Yep.  Do I think he'll keep all his campaign promises?  No more than any other president.

I support him because an Obama administration will have as a starting point a promise of non-partisan pragmatism.  Note that I say "a promise." Mrs. Clinton can't even offer us that much.  And Mr. McCain, who I admire, represents a continuation of policies that have proven less than impressive, the candidate of a party in desperate need of some time off for reflection.

Your attack -- excuse me, attacks plural -- would no doubt be effective if I were the straw man you envision.  But since I'm not, and since I haven't yet met an Obama supporter who was, you're like a punch-drunk boxer, throwing haymakers at an opponent who's standing in his corner enjoying a cool drink.


&lt;em&gt;If all Obama supporters were like you, a post like this wouldn' be necessary. But since millions of his supporters are as I describe, your "strawman" argument is ludicrous. It may be for you because, after all, you are more intelligent and discerning than your average Obamamaniac. But my "attacks" as you call them are damned effective because they are not aimed at you. They are aimed at other Obama supporters - the vast majority - who couldn't tell you why they support him but nevertheless hail him as the man who will bring change to Washington.

Stop personalizing every post I write about Obama. You are far from a typical Obama supporter. In fact, why aren't you doing anything to inform your fellow Obama supporters and try and bring them around to your realistic appraisal of the candidate and what he can accomplish? The reason is you would be shouted down - as they are shouting down the Hillary supporters at Kos and elsewhere. These movement Obamamaniacs will brook no opposition to their view of the candidate - which only reinforces my arguments about why Obama is a hypocrite of monstrous proportions.

Ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Barack Obama is just another politician â€“ devious when he has to be, vague when it suits him, and a liar when necessity calls. May this incident involving Reverend Wright open the eyes of most of those who have lost themselves in Obamaâ€™s rhetorical fog so that they can see who and what they are supporting for President of the United States.</i></p>
<p>Classic straw man logic.  You assume you know what we Obama supporters see in Obama, and then inform us that we are terribly mistaken, and finally announce that we&#8217;re beaten, destroyed, devastated by your overwhelming attack.  </p>
<p>I support Obama.  I&#8217;ve never thought he was anything other than a politician.  I wouldn&#8217;t want him to be.  The presidency, after all, is kind of a political job.  </p>
<p>I support Obama for one simple reason:  he has built his campaign on the notion of reaching beyond the intellectual dead end of hyperpartisanship.  </p>
<p>Do I think he&#8217;s Jesus come back to save us?  Um . . . no.  Do I think he&#8217;s a reincarnated George Washington?  Nope.  Do I expect he&#8217;ll be disappointing, as all politicians end up being?  Yep.  Do I think he&#8217;ll keep all his campaign promises?  No more than any other president.</p>
<p>I support him because an Obama administration will have as a starting point a promise of non-partisan pragmatism.  Note that I say &#8220;a promise.&#8221; Mrs. Clinton can&#8217;t even offer us that much.  And Mr. McCain, who I admire, represents a continuation of policies that have proven less than impressive, the candidate of a party in desperate need of some time off for reflection.</p>
<p>Your attack &#8212; excuse me, attacks plural &#8212; would no doubt be effective if I were the straw man you envision.  But since I&#8217;m not, and since I haven&#8217;t yet met an Obama supporter who was, you&#8217;re like a punch-drunk boxer, throwing haymakers at an opponent who&#8217;s standing in his corner enjoying a cool drink.</p>
<p><em>If all Obama supporters were like you, a post like this wouldn&#8217; be necessary. But since millions of his supporters are as I describe, your &#8220;strawman&#8221; argument is ludicrous. It may be for you because, after all, you are more intelligent and discerning than your average Obamamaniac. But my &#8220;attacks&#8221; as you call them are damned effective because they are not aimed at you. They are aimed at other Obama supporters - the vast majority - who couldn&#8217;t tell you why they support him but nevertheless hail him as the man who will bring change to Washington.</p>
<p>Stop personalizing every post I write about Obama. You are far from a typical Obama supporter. In fact, why aren&#8217;t you doing anything to inform your fellow Obama supporters and try and bring them around to your realistic appraisal of the candidate and what he can accomplish? The reason is you would be shouted down - as they are shouting down the Hillary supporters at Kos and elsewhere. These movement Obamamaniacs will brook no opposition to their view of the candidate - which only reinforces my arguments about why Obama is a hypocrite of monstrous proportions.</p>
<p>Ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HE HATE ME</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1379033</link>
		<dc:creator>HE HATE ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1379033</guid>
		<description>His supporters will rationalize and enable the most egregious bahaviors- not his fault the various people he associated with are racist ministers, Chicago slumlord crooks, former domestic terrorists , et al. 
Local moonbats tell me whatever Obama is, he's still much better than McCain or Bush. And there is much true about what the Rev stated- like govt. injected black in Alabama with syphilis (yes, I know it is another big lie from the left). 

I lump BHO in with Ron Paul as to both being ignorant of what was going on under the noses. I see The Anchoress blog thinks what garbage the Rev. spews is really no reflection on Obama.

Would like to see what spin 60 Minutes or Dan Rather would put on this story, if they'd even touch it. I'm sure the media is dying to come  up with something on McCain. Imagine if Eliot (Mess) Spitzer were a Republican.  

Does anyone know whom the Paultards are now supporting? I figured Obama, but  a few have said no. In any case, both Paul and Obama have that cult of personality down. Americans don't have a clue. One leftard tried to tell me Che Guevera is idolized because he was a doctor who helped the poor and fought against Castro's communism. Right. And Mikey Moore speaks truth to power. 

Whites make life hell for blacks. Of course OJ and Oprah are exceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His supporters will rationalize and enable the most egregious bahaviors- not his fault the various people he associated with are racist ministers, Chicago slumlord crooks, former domestic terrorists , et al.<br />
Local moonbats tell me whatever Obama is, he&#8217;s still much better than McCain or Bush. And there is much true about what the Rev stated- like govt. injected black in Alabama with syphilis (yes, I know it is another big lie from the left). </p>
<p>I lump BHO in with Ron Paul as to both being ignorant of what was going on under the noses. I see The Anchoress blog thinks what garbage the Rev. spews is really no reflection on Obama.</p>
<p>Would like to see what spin 60 Minutes or Dan Rather would put on this story, if they&#8217;d even touch it. I&#8217;m sure the media is dying to come  up with something on McCain. Imagine if Eliot (Mess) Spitzer were a Republican.  </p>
<p>Does anyone know whom the Paultards are now supporting? I figured Obama, but  a few have said no. In any case, both Paul and Obama have that cult of personality down. Americans don&#8217;t have a clue. One leftard tried to tell me Che Guevera is idolized because he was a doctor who helped the poor and fought against Castro&#8217;s communism. Right. And Mikey Moore speaks truth to power. </p>
<p>Whites make life hell for blacks. Of course OJ and Oprah are exceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/comment-page-1/#comment-1378960</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/15/obama-just-another-lying-weasel-of-a-politician/#comment-1378960</guid>
		<description>Obama said he assumes that Trumpet Magazine (using the name of the magazine, run by Wright's two daughters does some mind trick of disassociating Wright with the magazine) bestowed the honor on Farrakhan due to Farrakhan's efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders.  At one blog it is noted that no where in the Trumpet Magazine's honor of Farrakhan is any effort to rehabilitate ex-offenders mentioned.  So it is odd that Obama would even mention that work by Farrakhan unless.........personal knowledge, perhaps and a closer relationship to Farrakhan than he is admitting to?

Obama had invited Wright to give the invocation the day he announced his candidacy but at the 11th hour, the night before, disinvited Wright due to Wright's questionable sermons.  So to say that he was unaware of Wright's racism is just pure bull.  And Obama admitted that when he went off to Harvard, he took Wright's recordings with him.  Are we to assume that Wright, who is the son of a Baptist minister and could not get a church from them due to his "black power" views, never said anything in 20 years to lead Barack to understand the racist views held by his pastor?

Sorry, that dog won't hunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama said he assumes that Trumpet Magazine (using the name of the magazine, run by Wright&#8217;s two daughters does some mind trick of disassociating Wright with the magazine) bestowed the honor on Farrakhan due to Farrakhan&#8217;s efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders.  At one blog it is noted that no where in the Trumpet Magazine&#8217;s honor of Farrakhan is any effort to rehabilitate ex-offenders mentioned.  So it is odd that Obama would even mention that work by Farrakhan unless&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;personal knowledge, perhaps and a closer relationship to Farrakhan than he is admitting to?</p>
<p>Obama had invited Wright to give the invocation the day he announced his candidacy but at the 11th hour, the night before, disinvited Wright due to Wright&#8217;s questionable sermons.  So to say that he was unaware of Wright&#8217;s racism is just pure bull.  And Obama admitted that when he went off to Harvard, he took Wright&#8217;s recordings with him.  Are we to assume that Wright, who is the son of a Baptist minister and could not get a church from them due to his &#8220;black power&#8221; views, never said anything in 20 years to lead Barack to understand the racist views held by his pastor?</p>
<p>Sorry, that dog won&#8217;t hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
