<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CONSPIRACY MILL CHURNING ON OBAMA PASSPORT STORY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michaek</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1403654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1403654</guid>
		<description>I hear the guilty parties were actually Obama supporters...how do you explain that all you conspircay nutjobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear the guilty parties were actually Obama supporters&#8230;how do you explain that all you conspircay nutjobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Miller</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1403555</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1403555</guid>
		<description>There is no other word for 99% of Dems except UNHINGED IDIOTS!

Hillzilla's file and McCain's file were also accessed.

But then so were Britney Spears' medical records of her recent hospitalizations.  Does some muffinhead blame GWB's administration for THAT as well!?

Good grief Charley Brown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no other word for 99% of Dems except UNHINGED IDIOTS!</p>
<p>Hillzilla&#8217;s file and McCain&#8217;s file were also accessed.</p>
<p>But then so were Britney Spears&#8217; medical records of her recent hospitalizations.  Does some muffinhead blame GWB&#8217;s administration for THAT as well!?</p>
<p>Good grief Charley Brown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1399986</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1399986</guid>
		<description>According to the Washington Times:

"The State Department investigation of improper computer access to passport records of three presidential candidates is focusing on one remaining employee â€” a contract worker with a company headed by an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama....The third employee, who has not been fired, worked for The Analysis Corporation (TAC), which is headed by John O. Brennan, a former CIA agent who is an adviser to Mr. Obamaâ€™s presidential campaign on intelligence and foreign policy.

The TAC employee is the only individual to have accessed both Mr. Obamaâ€™s and Mr. McCainâ€™s passport information without proper authorization, a State Department spokesman said. That employee, who was not named, triggered an electronic alarm system, officials familiar with the probe said."

Yet according to tHePeOPle:

"Calling â€œconspiracyâ€ today is a way of trashing your opponent and relegating whatever theyâ€™re questioning to the garbage, no matter the validity. This is ridiculous, because in the course of reasoned, rational thought, itâ€™s often necessary to ask such seemingly odd or conspiratorial sounding questions. It forces you to think in different ways and reach conclusions you might not have thought of otherwise."



&lt;em&gt;Also, the guy's "conspiracies proved true" were laughable. For instance, the CIA selling crack has been debunked thoroghly. The coke was being shipped and sold by contract employees and proprietary airlines with CIA connections. But to say that actual employees of the US government were profiting from the drug trade is ridiculous. The CIA used drug smugglers to get guns to the contras because, well, who else were they going to use, FedEx? To smuggle guns in that part of the world you use smugglers. And people like Gene Hassenfuss smuggled everything from drugs and guns to blue jeans. 

This seemed to grate on the sensibilities of many liberals who insist that there is no difference between a CIA contract employee and actual CIA government employees. Did they know the guys were smuggling drugs? Duh. Should they have turned a blind eye when they started to ship to the US? To believe that crack wouldn't have gotten in some other way is to believe in fairy tales. 

As for most of his other "conspiracies" they hardly qualify as such. Secret government programs are not conspiracies - only secret. There's a difference that the gentlemen doesn't make.

ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Washington Times:</p>
<p>&#8220;The State Department investigation of improper computer access to passport records of three presidential candidates is focusing on one remaining employee â€” a contract worker with a company headed by an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama&#8230;.The third employee, who has not been fired, worked for The Analysis Corporation (TAC), which is headed by John O. Brennan, a former CIA agent who is an adviser to Mr. Obamaâ€™s presidential campaign on intelligence and foreign policy.</p>
<p>The TAC employee is the only individual to have accessed both Mr. Obamaâ€™s and Mr. McCainâ€™s passport information without proper authorization, a State Department spokesman said. That employee, who was not named, triggered an electronic alarm system, officials familiar with the probe said.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet according to tHePeOPle:</p>
<p>&#8220;Calling â€œconspiracyâ€ today is a way of trashing your opponent and relegating whatever theyâ€™re questioning to the garbage, no matter the validity. This is ridiculous, because in the course of reasoned, rational thought, itâ€™s often necessary to ask such seemingly odd or conspiratorial sounding questions. It forces you to think in different ways and reach conclusions you might not have thought of otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Also, the guy&#8217;s &#8220;conspiracies proved true&#8221; were laughable. For instance, the CIA selling crack has been debunked thoroghly. The coke was being shipped and sold by contract employees and proprietary airlines with CIA connections. But to say that actual employees of the US government were profiting from the drug trade is ridiculous. The CIA used drug smugglers to get guns to the contras because, well, who else were they going to use, FedEx? To smuggle guns in that part of the world you use smugglers. And people like Gene Hassenfuss smuggled everything from drugs and guns to blue jeans. </p>
<p>This seemed to grate on the sensibilities of many liberals who insist that there is no difference between a CIA contract employee and actual CIA government employees. Did they know the guys were smuggling drugs? Duh. Should they have turned a blind eye when they started to ship to the US? To believe that crack wouldn&#8217;t have gotten in some other way is to believe in fairy tales. </p>
<p>As for most of his other &#8220;conspiracies&#8221; they hardly qualify as such. Secret government programs are not conspiracies - only secret. There&#8217;s a difference that the gentlemen doesn&#8217;t make.</p>
<p>ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1395383</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1395383</guid>
		<description>So they got into Hussein O's passport files. The conspircy nuts got shot down. They also got in Shrillary's and McCains....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they got into Hussein O&#8217;s passport files. The conspircy nuts got shot down. They also got in Shrillary&#8217;s and McCains&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tHePeOPle</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1394308</link>
		<dc:creator>tHePeOPle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1394308</guid>
		<description>Conspiracies are for the weak minded. They are a lazy substitute for reasoned, rational thought. 

Itâ€™s disturbing how calling "conspiracy" has become the shorthand version of sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating "I'm not listening to you." over and over. 

Calling "conspiracy" today is a way of trashing your opponent and relegating whatever they're questioning to the garbage, no matter the validity. This is ridiculous, because in the course of reasoned, rational thought, it's often necessary to ask such seemingly odd or conspiratorial sounding questions. It forces you to think in different ways and reach conclusions you might not have thought of otherwise. 

Calling conspiracy is a cop-out. It essentially ends debate during the exploratory reasoning process. Sometimes there is a conspiracy. 

The Tuskegee Experiment was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.

The CIA trafficking cocaine was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.

Extraordinary Rendition was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.

The US Overthrowing Democratically Elected Governments is a conspiracy that's been proved time and time again.

George W. Bush attempting to incite a Palestinian civil war was a conspiracy theory until it was proved true. 

US funding terrorists in Iraq so they won't blow us up was a conspiracy until it was proved true. 

The temptation to shut people down by calling "Conspiracy!" is great. It's a fast and painless way to embarrass your opponent and dismiss what they're saying. Sometimes instant dismissal is valid, sometimes it's not. It would seem to me though that reasoned, rational thought requires exploring all lines of questioning, even those easily dismissed at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspiracies are for the weak minded. They are a lazy substitute for reasoned, rational thought. </p>
<p>Itâ€™s disturbing how calling &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; has become the shorthand version of sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating &#8220;I&#8217;m not listening to you.&#8221; over and over. </p>
<p>Calling &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; today is a way of trashing your opponent and relegating whatever they&#8217;re questioning to the garbage, no matter the validity. This is ridiculous, because in the course of reasoned, rational thought, it&#8217;s often necessary to ask such seemingly odd or conspiratorial sounding questions. It forces you to think in different ways and reach conclusions you might not have thought of otherwise. </p>
<p>Calling conspiracy is a cop-out. It essentially ends debate during the exploratory reasoning process. Sometimes there is a conspiracy. </p>
<p>The Tuskegee Experiment was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.</p>
<p>The CIA trafficking cocaine was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.</p>
<p>Extraordinary Rendition was a conspiracy theory, until it was proved true.</p>
<p>The US Overthrowing Democratically Elected Governments is a conspiracy that&#8217;s been proved time and time again.</p>
<p>George W. Bush attempting to incite a Palestinian civil war was a conspiracy theory until it was proved true. </p>
<p>US funding terrorists in Iraq so they won&#8217;t blow us up was a conspiracy until it was proved true. </p>
<p>The temptation to shut people down by calling &#8220;Conspiracy!&#8221; is great. It&#8217;s a fast and painless way to embarrass your opponent and dismiss what they&#8217;re saying. Sometimes instant dismissal is valid, sometimes it&#8217;s not. It would seem to me though that reasoned, rational thought requires exploring all lines of questioning, even those easily dismissed at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Postagoras</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1393920</link>
		<dc:creator>Postagoras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1393920</guid>
		<description>Yawn... gosh. something that looks like oppo research is viewed by some blogs as a conspiracy.  This includes Macsmind, who says "... itâ€™s my belief that whatever they found is already out there somewhere, and I imagine itâ€™s very damning."

I agree that this is a non-story, but when bloggers find conspiracies, that's also a non-story.  Shoot any fish in a barrel lately, Rick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn&#8230; gosh. something that looks like oppo research is viewed by some blogs as a conspiracy.  This includes Macsmind, who says &#8220;&#8230; itâ€™s my belief that whatever they found is already out there somewhere, and I imagine itâ€™s very damning.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree that this is a non-story, but when bloggers find conspiracies, that&#8217;s also a non-story.  Shoot any fish in a barrel lately, Rick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Paxety</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1393833</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Paxety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1393833</guid>
		<description>It's obvious Hillary and BusHitler are on the same side.  After all, Rush Limbaugh is supporting Hillary, and even ordering Repukes to register as Democrats.  And I once saw an interview with Woody Harrelson's dad.  He ADMITTED one of the tramps looks just like him. So there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious Hillary and BusHitler are on the same side.  After all, Rush Limbaugh is supporting Hillary, and even ordering Repukes to register as Democrats.  And I once saw an interview with Woody Harrelson&#8217;s dad.  He ADMITTED one of the tramps looks just like him. So there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Paxety</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1393816</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Paxety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1393816</guid>
		<description>It's obvious Hillary and BusHitler are on the same side.  After all, Rush Limbaugh is supporting Hillary.  And I once saw an interview with Woody Harrelson's dad.  He ADMITTED one of the tramps looks just like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious Hillary and BusHitler are on the same side.  After all, Rush Limbaugh is supporting Hillary.  And I once saw an interview with Woody Harrelson&#8217;s dad.  He ADMITTED one of the tramps looks just like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogier Franken</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1393725</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogier Franken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1393725</guid>
		<description>I realy wonder what is in those passport details that makes him so scared that his passport details are going to be used against his campaign. 

This clearly shows that he has realy something realy bad to hide there.

Maybe a recent travel to some Muslim country, where he made negociations with his Muslim brothers for bringing a Muslim takeover of USA and the introduction of a worldwide Sharia Law.

And i am also sure it has something to do with his well hidden Muslim background.

USA and the rest of the world is in serious danger and doomed, when he comes into power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realy wonder what is in those passport details that makes him so scared that his passport details are going to be used against his campaign. </p>
<p>This clearly shows that he has realy something realy bad to hide there.</p>
<p>Maybe a recent travel to some Muslim country, where he made negociations with his Muslim brothers for bringing a Muslim takeover of USA and the introduction of a worldwide Sharia Law.</p>
<p>And i am also sure it has something to do with his well hidden Muslim background.</p>
<p>USA and the rest of the world is in serious danger and doomed, when he comes into power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetie</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1393686</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/03/21/conspiracy-mill-churning-on-obama-passport-story/#comment-1393686</guid>
		<description>If Bush can single handedly smite the warmening of the seas just imagine what he can do with Barack's passport?  

Like adding two more passports and making a small shelter for a tiny toy dog.  Or skimming it across a tiled floor.  Or snicker over a really bad photo.  Or taking a magic marker and drawing a mustache on Obama's face (Laura always get's a kick out of that one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bush can single handedly smite the warmening of the seas just imagine what he can do with Barack&#8217;s passport?  </p>
<p>Like adding two more passports and making a small shelter for a tiny toy dog.  Or skimming it across a tiled floor.  Or snicker over a really bad photo.  Or taking a magic marker and drawing a mustache on Obama&#8217;s face (Laura always get&#8217;s a kick out of that one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
