What is meant by “anti-American” is Wright’s vilification of the present US government for the sins of the past. Where is Wright’s praise for US government efforts, supported by the general populace, for the past 50 years?
If Wright is not a bigot, where is his castigation of the Muslim-dominated countries still practicing slavery and genocide against Black Chrisians, Black Animists, and Black Muslims today?
Have we heard a beep from from Wright or his buddy Farrakhan about these continuing atrocities by nonAmericans against Blacks and others. Obama, not too long ago, was promoting the idea of rapid withdrawal of US troops from Iraq even if it meant genocide would ensue in Iraq.
Has Wright, the master of malign harangues, or Obama, the Great Dissembler, spoken out against the enslavemrnt and slow-motion genocide of the Tibetans?
Has the vast majority of the American Black clergy and the Congressional Black Caucus spoken out loudly and truthfully about these ‘foreign’ atrocities?
What actions have they vigorously pursued for justice for those innocents?
Where are the Black American organizations teaching, mentoring, training, nurturing the young to strive to be the best they can be, as are the 75% of Black Americans who have WORKED their way out of poverty? Why are recent Carribean Black immigrants, African Black immigrants, Korean immigrants and Vietnamese immigrants making more progress than now-native Black Americans? Why aren’t those attitudes and efforts for self-upliftment being emulated and adapted by Wright’s and Obama’s Black constituencies? Why are there so few voices speaking against the corrupt and corrupting Black American leadership and for their deliberately dumbed-down followership?
Why are Wright and the Obamas speaking to their constituencies against this self-effort, while they themselves reap the benefits of America’s open society. What slimes!

You forget how angry McCain was after losing to Bush in 2000. It is widely believed his consideration of these two options were seriously considered.

I’m not repeating anything new here, nor anything that hasn’t appeared in print thousands of times.

McCain is neither a party-guy nor a conservative in any ideological sense. He will never be forgiven for trying with Kennedy and Graham to push amnesty through Congress before too many noticed.

Work on your Wright chops, after all he’s a maverick just like McCain. At least the McCain of 2000. Today’s McCain is not the man I knew before Rove cut off his testicles in 2000. Wright is not a candidate last time I checked.

Eh, you’ll find no love for McCain here (he is RINO personified in my eyes), but parroting the “nearly twice” MSM line of BS is not plausible, unless, of course, you have ironclad evidence of that slur by same MSM?

If not, why repeat it?

*((5475-4540)/4570)x 100 = 20.6%

As Sherlock Holmes might say, “Alimentary, my dear canal.”

I guess so. Barack Obama and Rev. Wright both grew up in the middle class, but are now living upper class lives.

Just because Obama is black doesn’t mean that he’s exempt from criticism. The fact remains that he belongs to an organization that gave a lifetime achievement award to a man (Louis Farrahkan) who publicly refers to Jews as “bloodsuckers.” Yet, somehow, no one’s allowed to talk about it because Obama is black.

Obama had created a frenzy among his followers that we have not seen in some time. People who hang on to his every word without knowing what those words mean or understanding that at the basis of his beliefs lie Saul Alinsky “communalism” and Marxist “government”. He has told them that He is the one to lead them out of the social darkness. “He” is the one they have been waiting for. The American Messiah who will lead us to his socialistic utopia because although socialism has never really worked before, it was not lead by him. To think that Senator Obama has not played the “race” card before now, is to not have really listened to what he has said. I ask you, is there any doubt who he was referring to with his “guns, God and people who don’t look like them” remarks in San Francisco? Could his remarks about Selma many months ago have been your first clue that the bar was being set and that anyone who questions his socialist views will be label “racist” or “bigot”?

This campaign was set up long ago by Obama to make sure that any criticism of him would be labeled racist. And he has done that very, very successfully. So a nation that has drawn the lines to protect a certain segment of our society has been hoisted by it’s own petard.

And now the Democratic Party, the party of identity politics, is in real trouble. It is about to split right down the middle and the left wing talking heads knows it. Today, on Fox Cable News, Bob Beckel was asked about the NC GOP ad. He called the people of NC “racist crackers”. He was so angry I thought he was going to burst a blood vessel in his neck. Racist crackers? Is that now the acceptable terminology for those who question Obama’s relationship with a radical minister? Is “racist” now the new term for “radical” when it applies to Obama?

It is fair to ask Senator Obama is he subscribes to the preaching of Rev. Wright and the teachings of James Cone who Wright bases his Black Liberation theology on. It is fair to ask Obama if he too, agrees with Cone. It is also fair to question why Senator Obama seems to have ties with so many radicals like Wright, Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko and a man who is a known PLO supporter. It is also fair to ask why his wife thinks that America is “mean”.

Had the table been turned, and a Republican candidate had sat for 20 years in the pew of a church that had a minister of the caliber of David Duke and then said that he could no more disown his minister than he could his own “white” community, would that Republican even be a consideration for the President of the United States or would he be facing protest marches?