<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OBAMA SUPPORTERS UNDERCUT CANDIDATE&#8217;S CRITIQUE OF MCCAIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sknabt</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1651945</link>
		<dc:creator>sknabt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1651945</guid>
		<description>Rick,

While I don't begrudge Sarah Palin a tanning bed, at $12,000, it is a couple orders of magnitude greater an extravagance than John Edwards' $400 haircut which conservatives wouldn't let go of.

So if you want to go after liberal hypocrites why spare your buddy conservatives who were, IMHO, &lt;i&gt;far more&lt;/i&gt; hysterical over &lt;i&gt;far less&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t begrudge Sarah Palin a tanning bed, at $12,000, it is a couple orders of magnitude greater an extravagance than John Edwards&#8217; $400 haircut which conservatives wouldn&#8217;t let go of.</p>
<p>So if you want to go after liberal hypocrites why spare your buddy conservatives who were, IMHO, <i>far more</i> hysterical over <i>far less</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed American</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646661</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646661</guid>
		<description>Tim, It is obviously more worthy to sell out ones integrity and honesty in a bid for the white house than to distance yourself from people.  I would say morals but McCain decided a long time ago to cheat on his last wife...yeeaaaa.....morals....down the toilet there. 

Now according to jambrowski my arguments are illogical.  I would like him/her to refute the fact that 
1.  McCain sold out on his integrity and honesty (just look at his ads)
2.  McCain cheated on his last wife

Plus I like the fact that jambrowski says "messiah"...next will come "elitist" and other GOP buzz words.  P.O.W! P.O.W! P.O.W!  

jambrowski, I believe you are indicating that I stumbled upon this article by mistake.  I have had Right Wing Nut House on a feed to bloglines for awhile now.  You are obviously one who picked a party line and started cheering your horse on..no matter the controversy.  You are an "independent thinking individual" are you?  Riiiiight.  Just like Bill O'Reilly is a non-partisan moderate independent.

My main argument with this site is that Rick has been letting McCain get away with all of his crap and not calling him out on any of it!  On no!!!! Obama said "lipstick on a pig" lets write an artical on it.  Listening to the speech you know Obama was talking about McCain policy...just hearing a soundbite you think he is referring to Palin.  McCain said same about a policy of Hillary's in the past...you know what...we just won't bring that up.  Never happened.  P.O.W!  P.O.W!

Tim brought up a valid point about Carly Fiorina...and all you (jambrowski) can say is "you know where mccain and palin stand" and then try and turn around on Obama.  Uh-Oh!  Something bad about McCain.  Throw up the smokescreen.  P.O.W!  P.O.W!  

Gets tiring hear someone say (in my case write) P.O.W!  Doesn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, It is obviously more worthy to sell out ones integrity and honesty in a bid for the white house than to distance yourself from people.  I would say morals but McCain decided a long time ago to cheat on his last wife&#8230;yeeaaaa&#8230;..morals&#8230;.down the toilet there. </p>
<p>Now according to jambrowski my arguments are illogical.  I would like him/her to refute the fact that<br />
1.  McCain sold out on his integrity and honesty (just look at his ads)<br />
2.  McCain cheated on his last wife</p>
<p>Plus I like the fact that jambrowski says &#8220;messiah&#8221;&#8230;next will come &#8220;elitist&#8221; and other GOP buzz words.  P.O.W! P.O.W! P.O.W!  </p>
<p>jambrowski, I believe you are indicating that I stumbled upon this article by mistake.  I have had Right Wing Nut House on a feed to bloglines for awhile now.  You are obviously one who picked a party line and started cheering your horse on..no matter the controversy.  You are an &#8220;independent thinking individual&#8221; are you?  Riiiiight.  Just like Bill O&#8217;Reilly is a non-partisan moderate independent.</p>
<p>My main argument with this site is that Rick has been letting McCain get away with all of his crap and not calling him out on any of it!  On no!!!! Obama said &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; lets write an artical on it.  Listening to the speech you know Obama was talking about McCain policy&#8230;just hearing a soundbite you think he is referring to Palin.  McCain said same about a policy of Hillary&#8217;s in the past&#8230;you know what&#8230;we just won&#8217;t bring that up.  Never happened.  P.O.W!  P.O.W!</p>
<p>Tim brought up a valid point about Carly Fiorina&#8230;and all you (jambrowski) can say is &#8220;you know where mccain and palin stand&#8221; and then try and turn around on Obama.  Uh-Oh!  Something bad about McCain.  Throw up the smokescreen.  P.O.W!  P.O.W!  </p>
<p>Gets tiring hear someone say (in my case write) P.O.W!  Doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jambrowski</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646643</link>
		<dc:creator>jambrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646643</guid>
		<description>tim, 
be scared, be very scared... empty suits have many  surprises... as it goes you know where mccain and palin stand and have stood, you cannot know where the "messiah" actually stands because it is all hypothetical, he has done nothing and has led nothing... except that is throwing people under the proverbial bus. i would have respected the chap had he not dumped his pastor and other members of his campaign, people make mistakes and misspeak (look at biden) but he dumped them (people he knew for years, decades), what is he going to do to his constituency when and if he gets elected? see how thick that ice is tim, you go first though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim,<br />
be scared, be very scared&#8230; empty suits have many  surprises&#8230; as it goes you know where mccain and palin stand and have stood, you cannot know where the &#8220;messiah&#8221; actually stands because it is all hypothetical, he has done nothing and has led nothing&#8230; except that is throwing people under the proverbial bus. i would have respected the chap had he not dumped his pastor and other members of his campaign, people make mistakes and misspeak (look at biden) but he dumped them (people he knew for years, decades), what is he going to do to his constituency when and if he gets elected? see how thick that ice is tim, you go first though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646405</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646405</guid>
		<description>...All this screaming about "Lies" and tanning beds... Here's all that matters:

McCain's economic guru, Phil Grahmm created this mess - Plain and simple. McCain thinks he's a genius. 

McCain keeps talking about CEO's walking away with golden parachutes yet his advisor, Carly Fiorina did just that. She was fired for screwing up Hewlitt Packard, yet walked away with 40 million dollars. And she's out there saying who is and who isn't qualified to run a company. Good one, Carly. You finally did something right.

Then you have McCain's answer to the economic crisis - form a 9-11 style commission.HAHAHAHAH!

This day will be remembered for all time as a comedy of errors for the republican party. And  a tragedy for the rest us who finally realize that the republican "let's de-regulate everything" is a really bad idea. 

This is the beginning of McCain's massive defeat. And we couldn't have sealed it any better than him. Truly remarkable...

He actually had me scared for minute there.... Obama is going to pummel him all the way to November!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;All this screaming about &#8220;Lies&#8221; and tanning beds&#8230; Here&#8217;s all that matters:</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s economic guru, Phil Grahmm created this mess - Plain and simple. McCain thinks he&#8217;s a genius. </p>
<p>McCain keeps talking about CEO&#8217;s walking away with golden parachutes yet his advisor, Carly Fiorina did just that. She was fired for screwing up Hewlitt Packard, yet walked away with 40 million dollars. And she&#8217;s out there saying who is and who isn&#8217;t qualified to run a company. Good one, Carly. You finally did something right.</p>
<p>Then you have McCain&#8217;s answer to the economic crisis - form a 9-11 style commission.HAHAHAHAH!</p>
<p>This day will be remembered for all time as a comedy of errors for the republican party. And  a tragedy for the rest us who finally realize that the republican &#8220;let&#8217;s de-regulate everything&#8221; is a really bad idea. </p>
<p>This is the beginning of McCain&#8217;s massive defeat. And we couldn&#8217;t have sealed it any better than him. Truly remarkable&#8230;</p>
<p>He actually had me scared for minute there&#8230;. Obama is going to pummel him all the way to November!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antimedia</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646391</link>
		<dc:creator>Antimedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646391</guid>
		<description>aric writes "I wish someone would call this woman out on her crazy views with regard to Creationism; you can’t teach it both ways either the world is 6000 years old or not. And birth control – the abstinence only policy makes me wonder if any of these folks were ever teenagers."

So now it's crazy to say one ought to be allowed to discuss alternate views and theories?  Because Palin has never said creationism ought to be taught in public schools.  She simply said she didn't see anything wrong with the concept being discussed in schools.

Of course nowadays far too many Americans prefer to suppress debate by insulting others or shouting them down.

As for birth control, this may come as a surprise to you, but not every teenager is a rutting pig.  Some actually have the maturity to abstain from sex until they are older and more mature.  Some are actually crazy enough to abstain until they are married.

It's amazing how many people in this country seem to think that their way is the only way and all other ways are wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aric writes &#8220;I wish someone would call this woman out on her crazy views with regard to Creationism; you can’t teach it both ways either the world is 6000 years old or not. And birth control – the abstinence only policy makes me wonder if any of these folks were ever teenagers.&#8221;</p>
<p>So now it&#8217;s crazy to say one ought to be allowed to discuss alternate views and theories?  Because Palin has never said creationism ought to be taught in public schools.  She simply said she didn&#8217;t see anything wrong with the concept being discussed in schools.</p>
<p>Of course nowadays far too many Americans prefer to suppress debate by insulting others or shouting them down.</p>
<p>As for birth control, this may come as a surprise to you, but not every teenager is a rutting pig.  Some actually have the maturity to abstain from sex until they are older and more mature.  Some are actually crazy enough to abstain until they are married.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many people in this country seem to think that their way is the only way and all other ways are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tucson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646280</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, over the past 50 years the majority of the economic indicators have been better when a Democrat has held the presidency. I have no explanation for why that is, but it's true. Democrats, good for the economy. That's exactly the opposite of what I had expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, over the past 50 years the majority of the economic indicators have been better when a Democrat has held the presidency. I have no explanation for why that is, but it&#8217;s true. Democrats, good for the economy. That&#8217;s exactly the opposite of what I had expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jambrowski</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646257</link>
		<dc:creator>jambrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646257</guid>
		<description>disappointed american,
are you mad, does it feel good, your attacks are baseless and pathetic, and your arguments illogical, i am tired of your rhetoric, you don't read this site, because if you did, you would know that more independent thinking individuals peruse this site than not. as for rick being biased, why don't you read one of his latest blogs "not my values", to see what kind of abuse he took for speaking his voice. as for defense, rick doesn't need any (you are correct) but i am sick and tired of people like you mindlessly abusing the gentleman cause you have a hair out of place and yes you are still playground ugly, go read the huff or rawstory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>disappointed american,<br />
are you mad, does it feel good, your attacks are baseless and pathetic, and your arguments illogical, i am tired of your rhetoric, you don&#8217;t read this site, because if you did, you would know that more independent thinking individuals peruse this site than not. as for rick being biased, why don&#8217;t you read one of his latest blogs &#8220;not my values&#8221;, to see what kind of abuse he took for speaking his voice. as for defense, rick doesn&#8217;t need any (you are correct) but i am sick and tired of people like you mindlessly abusing the gentleman cause you have a hair out of place and yes you are still playground ugly, go read the huff or rawstory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed American</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646197</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646197</guid>
		<description>@jambrowski

I'm sorry jambrowski...but it is hard to take your comment serious...if you were being serious even.  But I'll go with the assumption that you were at least attempting to make a point.

I'm not sure which "absurd comment" of mine you were remarking about.  Was it where I said Rick was a biased writer?  Of course he is a biased writer...everyone is biased one way or other.  FYI jambrowski, this website is called Right Wing Nut House.  Not obvious enough for you, eh?  "Right Wing" Nut House.  Get it now?  "Right".  As in - Republican.  As in - Republican point of view.  

I understand this is a biased site.  You should too though.  Just like I know if I go watch Keith Olbermann I'm going to get some liberal garbage (very biased...but in Keith's case very hateful).  Man, I could go on about Olbermann and O'Reilly all day.  They are like Nancy Grace...I love to hate them.

Anyways, I like to think of myself as right in the middle when it comes to politics but the truth is I swing left or right depending on the election.  I don't treat politics like sports.  I don't pick a side and blindly follow/cheer them on.  (Those last two lines I got from some other site and wish I could remember who wrote them to give them credit...but for right now it is enough that you know I agree with those statements.  Note the word blindly in there.)  To be honest I am really looking forward to the debates...as long as they address issues and get past the name calling and lies.

The rest of your comment was just pure trash.  Also, what "derisive misconstrued lies" are you referring to?  My statement contained facts and then contained my own opinions.  I'm not sure how my opinion that I'm disappointed in both parties is hurtful or is a lie but may I recommend that you re-read my post and digest it?

I'm pretty sure Rick Moran does not need your help in attacking what I wrote.  He can go edit the comment and make his own remarks.  He might even say I'm lying and would fit in at the Obama war room.  Rick is using one remark made by McCain and ignoring another.

McCain did not make a a sound, reasonable, point about the underlying strength of the economy.  He made TWO!  And they differed from each other (4 years ago you would have broken out the flip-flops for that one).  Rick is blindly defending one of McCain's statements which does not reconcile with the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jambrowski</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry jambrowski&#8230;but it is hard to take your comment serious&#8230;if you were being serious even.  But I&#8217;ll go with the assumption that you were at least attempting to make a point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure which &#8220;absurd comment&#8221; of mine you were remarking about.  Was it where I said Rick was a biased writer?  Of course he is a biased writer&#8230;everyone is biased one way or other.  FYI jambrowski, this website is called Right Wing Nut House.  Not obvious enough for you, eh?  &#8220;Right Wing&#8221; Nut House.  Get it now?  &#8220;Right&#8221;.  As in - Republican.  As in - Republican point of view.  </p>
<p>I understand this is a biased site.  You should too though.  Just like I know if I go watch Keith Olbermann I&#8217;m going to get some liberal garbage (very biased&#8230;but in Keith&#8217;s case very hateful).  Man, I could go on about Olbermann and O&#8217;Reilly all day.  They are like Nancy Grace&#8230;I love to hate them.</p>
<p>Anyways, I like to think of myself as right in the middle when it comes to politics but the truth is I swing left or right depending on the election.  I don&#8217;t treat politics like sports.  I don&#8217;t pick a side and blindly follow/cheer them on.  (Those last two lines I got from some other site and wish I could remember who wrote them to give them credit&#8230;but for right now it is enough that you know I agree with those statements.  Note the word blindly in there.)  To be honest I am really looking forward to the debates&#8230;as long as they address issues and get past the name calling and lies.</p>
<p>The rest of your comment was just pure trash.  Also, what &#8220;derisive misconstrued lies&#8221; are you referring to?  My statement contained facts and then contained my own opinions.  I&#8217;m not sure how my opinion that I&#8217;m disappointed in both parties is hurtful or is a lie but may I recommend that you re-read my post and digest it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Rick Moran does not need your help in attacking what I wrote.  He can go edit the comment and make his own remarks.  He might even say I&#8217;m lying and would fit in at the Obama war room.  Rick is using one remark made by McCain and ignoring another.</p>
<p>McCain did not make a a sound, reasonable, point about the underlying strength of the economy.  He made TWO!  And they differed from each other (4 years ago you would have broken out the flip-flops for that one).  Rick is blindly defending one of McCain&#8217;s statements which does not reconcile with the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646195</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646195</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin had a tanning bad? How crazy is that? Well, I was going to vote for McCain, but now that this incredible scandal has broken, I'm certainly going to think twice. A tanning bed? The outrage! Why, those things cost almost half of what a plate at an Obama fundraiser costs. Outrageous!

I think they're trying too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin had a tanning bad? How crazy is that? Well, I was going to vote for McCain, but now that this incredible scandal has broken, I&#8217;m certainly going to think twice. A tanning bed? The outrage! Why, those things cost almost half of what a plate at an Obama fundraiser costs. Outrageous!</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re trying too hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surabaya Stew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1646161</link>
		<dc:creator>Surabaya Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/16/obama-supporters-undercut-candidates-critique-of-mccain/#comment-1646161</guid>
		<description>Who gives a damn what Joe Biden is saying? The chances of the Republicans using Biden's "lies" in a campaign ad is nil, since nobody except pundits and political junkies pay any attention to him. By contrast, can anybody imagine the Democrats not using “the fundamentals of our economy are strong" in a commercial? McCain made a gaffe, that's all. Doesn't matter how "right" he is, the timing of his statement is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a damn what Joe Biden is saying? The chances of the Republicans using Biden&#8217;s &#8220;lies&#8221; in a campaign ad is nil, since nobody except pundits and political junkies pay any attention to him. By contrast, can anybody imagine the Democrats not using “the fundamentals of our economy are strong&#8221; in a commercial? McCain made a gaffe, that&#8217;s all. Doesn&#8217;t matter how &#8220;right&#8221; he is, the timing of his statement is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
