<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCAIN&#8217;S SPAIN GAFFE: TOO PROUD TO SAY HE COULDN&#8217;T UNDERSTAND THE INTERVIEWER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1660941</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 08:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1660941</guid>
		<description>Which is the more frightening prospect for you the American voter? And of course for those of us outside who will feel the effects?

1. Electing an elder man who perhaps forgot where Spain was on the map, or if that wasn't the case, someone who doesn't bother to ask for clarification when asked a question he doesn't understand. (Imagine strategy meetings?)

2. Electing a man who considers the democratically elected leader of an ally an "enemy" simply because they don't share the exact same ideologies.

And as for Jojo...Could you send you address and we could ship over the Franco memorabilia from here in Spain that you seem to so cherish. Perhaps Germany has a few Hitler busts lying around that you might want too?

http://troyshouse.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is the more frightening prospect for you the American voter? And of course for those of us outside who will feel the effects?</p>
<p>1. Electing an elder man who perhaps forgot where Spain was on the map, or if that wasn&#8217;t the case, someone who doesn&#8217;t bother to ask for clarification when asked a question he doesn&#8217;t understand. (Imagine strategy meetings?)</p>
<p>2. Electing a man who considers the democratically elected leader of an ally an &#8220;enemy&#8221; simply because they don&#8217;t share the exact same ideologies.</p>
<p>And as for Jojo&#8230;Could you send you address and we could ship over the Franco memorabilia from here in Spain that you seem to so cherish. Perhaps Germany has a few Hitler busts lying around that you might want too?</p>
<p><a href="http://troyshouse.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://troyshouse.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1660870</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1660870</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the point here is not to pretend that you hear what you don't. {my hearing is going off, and I guess at what I am hearing all the time} Still, it's dishonest, just like Palin spouting any talking point she can remember, at any time. Failures of communication like that should never come out of the mouth of any serious candidate for alderman.   It denegrates the idea of human intelligence to allow it at the McPalin level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the point here is not to pretend that you hear what you don&#8217;t. {my hearing is going off, and I guess at what I am hearing all the time} Still, it&#8217;s dishonest, just like Palin spouting any talking point she can remember, at any time. Failures of communication like that should never come out of the mouth of any serious candidate for alderman.   It denegrates the idea of human intelligence to allow it at the McPalin level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary H</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1659974</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1659974</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but as an American citizen with close ties to Spain (my grandparent's land), I find McCain's lack of knowledge regarding the relationship between the Spanish and American governments an issue of great concern. Yes, I have heard the interview with that radio person who happened to have a very thick accent. However, she TRIED to clarify several times the fact that she was talking about Spain... And I'm sorry but I do find it very insulting for a presidential candidate to bunch together Mr. Zapatero and Spain with South America. C'mon people... Spain has been a member of the EU for quite some time, and on top of that, it is a NATO ally who also sent troops to Irak in support of the US. Sorry, but as much as I would had like to vote for McCain, his ignorance about Spain just led me to realize that my vote should NOT go to him... Sadly enough I don't agree with many of Obama's "ideas", but I just can't get past this gross error from McCain's part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but as an American citizen with close ties to Spain (my grandparent&#8217;s land), I find McCain&#8217;s lack of knowledge regarding the relationship between the Spanish and American governments an issue of great concern. Yes, I have heard the interview with that radio person who happened to have a very thick accent. However, she TRIED to clarify several times the fact that she was talking about Spain&#8230; And I&#8217;m sorry but I do find it very insulting for a presidential candidate to bunch together Mr. Zapatero and Spain with South America. C&#8217;mon people&#8230; Spain has been a member of the EU for quite some time, and on top of that, it is a NATO ally who also sent troops to Irak in support of the US. Sorry, but as much as I would had like to vote for McCain, his ignorance about Spain just led me to realize that my vote should NOT go to him&#8230; Sadly enough I don&#8217;t agree with many of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;ideas&#8221;, but I just can&#8217;t get past this gross error from McCain&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1654023</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1654023</guid>
		<description>This is quite possibly the most ridiculous explanation I've ever heard (apart from the one that claims McCains POW injuries prevent him from using email).  Why can't you just admit that he was clueless?

I will not pretend to be a conservative.  I am not.  However, I am truly sympathetic to true conservatives who have become apologists for an incompetent campaign and candidate.  I could have been a Goldwater conservative, but the republican party of today holds no sway for me.  It is has become more concerned with dictating moral edicts than holding true to its fiscal foundation.  The bailout is proof of this.

Maybe the republican party can be returned to its conservative roots when President Obama gets them riled up.  Then, they can throw out the Bush neocons and all the BS out there to return to roots of fiscal responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite possibly the most ridiculous explanation I&#8217;ve ever heard (apart from the one that claims McCains POW injuries prevent him from using email).  Why can&#8217;t you just admit that he was clueless?</p>
<p>I will not pretend to be a conservative.  I am not.  However, I am truly sympathetic to true conservatives who have become apologists for an incompetent campaign and candidate.  I could have been a Goldwater conservative, but the republican party of today holds no sway for me.  It is has become more concerned with dictating moral edicts than holding true to its fiscal foundation.  The bailout is proof of this.</p>
<p>Maybe the republican party can be returned to its conservative roots when President Obama gets them riled up.  Then, they can throw out the Bush neocons and all the BS out there to return to roots of fiscal responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Anodam</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1651661</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Anodam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1651661</guid>
		<description>And of course to refute the McCain's just old and confused by the thick accent- here's this from his own staff:"No, the questioner asked several times about Senator McCain's willingness to meet Zapatero, and ID'd him in the question so there is no doubt Senator McCain knew exactly to whom the question referred," said McCain foreign policy adviser Randy Schuenemann in an email.  "Senator McCain refused to commit to a White House meeting with President Zapatero in this interview.:

McCain's campaign also noted that since Zapatero pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq, he has still sought a coveted White House meeting.   Representatives of his government have met with the campaigns to discuss the issue.

It seems quite possible in all this that McCain had stopped paying attention to the interview, but still got the policy line right on Spain by sticking to platitudes.   

But it's hard to imagine McCain saying this of a NATO member and European democracy, even one whose government is currently not seen as friendly: "I am willing to meet with any leader who is dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are for human rights, democracy and freedom and I will stand up to those who are not."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course to refute the McCain&#8217;s just old and confused by the thick accent- here&#8217;s this from his own staff:&#8221;No, the questioner asked several times about Senator McCain&#8217;s willingness to meet Zapatero, and ID&#8217;d him in the question so there is no doubt Senator McCain knew exactly to whom the question referred,&#8221; said McCain foreign policy adviser Randy Schuenemann in an email.  &#8220;Senator McCain refused to commit to a White House meeting with President Zapatero in this interview.:</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s campaign also noted that since Zapatero pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq, he has still sought a coveted White House meeting.   Representatives of his government have met with the campaigns to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>It seems quite possible in all this that McCain had stopped paying attention to the interview, but still got the policy line right on Spain by sticking to platitudes.   </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s hard to imagine McCain saying this of a NATO member and European democracy, even one whose government is currently not seen as friendly: &#8220;I am willing to meet with any leader who is dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are for human rights, democracy and freedom and I will stand up to those who are not.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Anodam</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1651658</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Anodam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1651658</guid>
		<description>The problem w/ McCain is this consistent theme of being emotional, reactive, bombastic and personal in all of his retorts. Even the decision he's made in which he had time to think are couched in some angry child mode; such as his rhetoric about firing the head of the SEC? It's a lot of silly, macho, crap  talk- and honestly Senator McCain hasn't really had a productive comment since this financial/credit markets debacle started.
He's like someone's really old embarrassing uncle- and I wouldn't let him be President either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem w/ McCain is this consistent theme of being emotional, reactive, bombastic and personal in all of his retorts. Even the decision he&#8217;s made in which he had time to think are couched in some angry child mode; such as his rhetoric about firing the head of the SEC? It&#8217;s a lot of silly, macho, crap  talk- and honestly Senator McCain hasn&#8217;t really had a productive comment since this financial/credit markets debacle started.<br />
He&#8217;s like someone&#8217;s really old embarrassing uncle- and I wouldn&#8217;t let him be President either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyperIon</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1650872</link>
		<dc:creator>HyperIon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1650872</guid>
		<description>you wrote:
"how the woman would trail off into incomprehensible gibberish at the end"

for a second there i thought you were talking about Sarah Palin.

so you're basically saying that a good hearing aid can fix all this. haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you wrote:<br />
&#8220;how the woman would trail off into incomprehensible gibberish at the end&#8221;</p>
<p>for a second there i thought you were talking about Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>so you&#8217;re basically saying that a good hearing aid can fix all this. haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Brother Jim</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1650105</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Brother Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1650105</guid>
		<description>Theodore Roosevelt escaped military service in the Civil War because he was 3 years old (1858-1919) - which would make sense to anyone who knew anything of US history and that TR became the youngest US president at 42 following McKinley's assassination in 1901.

TR was a moderately liberal Republican (when such creatures existed) who would have been comfortable in his party likely through the 60s or even the 70s, not unlike Javits or Keating or Brooke. He was an aggressive regulator of the excesses of Wall Street and big corp abuses - but he was no Populist. He once said, "It will never be any harder for a working man to make an appointment with me than it will be for a rich man - nor any easier."

I'd guess that McCain identifies with TR's bucking of his own party (in Roosevelt's time, pro-big business legislators)and with his interventionist, even imperialist, foreign policy. TR believed in an almost radical form of what we today call American exceptionalism - that the US had the responsibility to spread its democratic institutions to the far corners of the earth - more of a Bush, neo-con position than a McCain idea.

The combination of aggressive energy, vast intelligence, and political deftness that we now see clearly as the hallmarks of the skills that TR brought to the presidency are greatly needed but sadly lacking in 2008. We have an untested cipher running against a duplicitous moral and mental midget.

Where have you gone, Teddy Roosevelt - and people of such calibre? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theodore Roosevelt escaped military service in the Civil War because he was 3 years old (1858-1919) - which would make sense to anyone who knew anything of US history and that TR became the youngest US president at 42 following McKinley&#8217;s assassination in 1901.</p>
<p>TR was a moderately liberal Republican (when such creatures existed) who would have been comfortable in his party likely through the 60s or even the 70s, not unlike Javits or Keating or Brooke. He was an aggressive regulator of the excesses of Wall Street and big corp abuses - but he was no Populist. He once said, &#8220;It will never be any harder for a working man to make an appointment with me than it will be for a rich man - nor any easier.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess that McCain identifies with TR&#8217;s bucking of his own party (in Roosevelt&#8217;s time, pro-big business legislators)and with his interventionist, even imperialist, foreign policy. TR believed in an almost radical form of what we today call American exceptionalism - that the US had the responsibility to spread its democratic institutions to the far corners of the earth - more of a Bush, neo-con position than a McCain idea.</p>
<p>The combination of aggressive energy, vast intelligence, and political deftness that we now see clearly as the hallmarks of the skills that TR brought to the presidency are greatly needed but sadly lacking in 2008. We have an untested cipher running against a duplicitous moral and mental midget.</p>
<p>Where have you gone, Teddy Roosevelt - and people of such calibre? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1650055</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1650055</guid>
		<description>Rightwing Nuthouse to the rescue! Sorry, Rick but you are just a full-time McCain apologist spinner... And with this befuddled former fundamental de-regulator you're going to have your work cut out for you. Worse than the fact that McCain can barely think straight, is his campaign staff who is literally throwing rotten spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks. I'll stick with Obama's comprehensive plan to save our economy. Your candidate can get a 9-11 commission to tell him what to do or fire the Pope  ooops I mean Chris Cox - whoever! Spain, Mexico? What's the difference?

I really take exception to you saying that Josh Marshal's site should be dressed up like a clown. TPM may be wacky at times but the core of it citizen reporting and facts and footnotes and official documents to back up what they say. They dig, you spin and apologize. That makes you a sad clown. You must be pretty determined to see your party win at all costs to the American public because you, Rick Moran are a smart man and a brilliant writer. Your job just requires too much creativity and far-reaching spin to make a point. If McCain wins and I'm sure he won't -  he would be smart to put you on his staff. 

And the following article on an Obama presidency destroying America? Pure poppycock. Absolute diatribe, a filthy representation of the facts.Pure spin....pure fiction. We know better so please - don't give yourself a heart attack trying to spin McCain's disastrous campaign...


&lt;em&gt;See my "Blogs and the 2008 Election" post above. Marshall's site has degenerated into highlighting the latest insignificant, irrelevant slip of the tongue or the latest Palin rumor all day all the time. This guy got an award for journalism and he's practicing partisan hackery.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Where do I ever say an Obama presisdency would "destroy America?" 

&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a quote from that article. You tell me where I say that Obama would "destroy America:"&lt;/em&gt;

"Yes, an Obama victory would be bad for America. But if this country can survive a Jimmy Carter, a Herbert Hoover, and a George Bush, it can certainly survive an amateur and fakir like Obama. It will be his incompetence that probably saves us in the end. He has yet to prove himself a success at anything except getting elected. He was a failure as a community organizer, a failure as head of the Chicago Annenberg Project, a failure as a state senator, and a non-entity in the short time he has been a US senator.

With a record like that, how much do we really have to worry about?"

&lt;em&gt;As any fool can see, I say exactly the opposite - that an Obama presidency will NOT destroy America.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;I know you're stupid but I had no idea you lacked basic reading comprehension skills. Try a JC in your area. I'm sure they can help.&lt;/em&gt;

ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rightwing Nuthouse to the rescue! Sorry, Rick but you are just a full-time McCain apologist spinner&#8230; And with this befuddled former fundamental de-regulator you&#8217;re going to have your work cut out for you. Worse than the fact that McCain can barely think straight, is his campaign staff who is literally throwing rotten spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks. I&#8217;ll stick with Obama&#8217;s comprehensive plan to save our economy. Your candidate can get a 9-11 commission to tell him what to do or fire the Pope  ooops I mean Chris Cox - whoever! Spain, Mexico? What&#8217;s the difference?</p>
<p>I really take exception to you saying that Josh Marshal&#8217;s site should be dressed up like a clown. TPM may be wacky at times but the core of it citizen reporting and facts and footnotes and official documents to back up what they say. They dig, you spin and apologize. That makes you a sad clown. You must be pretty determined to see your party win at all costs to the American public because you, Rick Moran are a smart man and a brilliant writer. Your job just requires too much creativity and far-reaching spin to make a point. If McCain wins and I&#8217;m sure he won&#8217;t -  he would be smart to put you on his staff. </p>
<p>And the following article on an Obama presidency destroying America? Pure poppycock. Absolute diatribe, a filthy representation of the facts.Pure spin&#8230;.pure fiction. We know better so please - don&#8217;t give yourself a heart attack trying to spin McCain&#8217;s disastrous campaign&#8230;</p>
<p><em>See my &#8220;Blogs and the 2008 Election&#8221; post above. Marshall&#8217;s site has degenerated into highlighting the latest insignificant, irrelevant slip of the tongue or the latest Palin rumor all day all the time. This guy got an award for journalism and he&#8217;s practicing partisan hackery.</em></p>
<p><em>Where do I ever say an Obama presisdency would &#8220;destroy America?&#8221; </p>
<p></em><em>This is a quote from that article. You tell me where I say that Obama would &#8220;destroy America:&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, an Obama victory would be bad for America. But if this country can survive a Jimmy Carter, a Herbert Hoover, and a George Bush, it can certainly survive an amateur and fakir like Obama. It will be his incompetence that probably saves us in the end. He has yet to prove himself a success at anything except getting elected. He was a failure as a community organizer, a failure as head of the Chicago Annenberg Project, a failure as a state senator, and a non-entity in the short time he has been a US senator.</p>
<p>With a record like that, how much do we really have to worry about?&#8221;</p>
<p><em>As any fool can see, I say exactly the opposite - that an Obama presidency will NOT destroy America.</em></p>
<p><em>I know you&#8217;re stupid but I had no idea you lacked basic reading comprehension skills. Try a JC in your area. I&#8217;m sure they can help.</em></p>
<p>ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooper</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1649865</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/09/18/mccains-spain-gaffe-too-proud-to-say-he-couldnt-understand-the-interviewer/#comment-1649865</guid>
		<description>The reason McCain goofed on the Spanish interview is because he was on automatic and not really listening to what was said.  He is now so compromised, so far from the man of principle he used to be, that he probably doesn't hear things anymore.  Let us not forget, he also said Sarah Palin's son was in the Alaska National Guard, when he is in the Army.  Also, another vetting note:  he claims his hero is Teddy Roosevelt -- he probably doesn't know that Roosevelt escaped military service in the Civil War by paying someone to substitute for him.  You could do that, according to the New York draft laws of the time, and many wealthy men did just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason McCain goofed on the Spanish interview is because he was on automatic and not really listening to what was said.  He is now so compromised, so far from the man of principle he used to be, that he probably doesn&#8217;t hear things anymore.  Let us not forget, he also said Sarah Palin&#8217;s son was in the Alaska National Guard, when he is in the Army.  Also, another vetting note:  he claims his hero is Teddy Roosevelt &#8212; he probably doesn&#8217;t know that Roosevelt escaped military service in the Civil War by paying someone to substitute for him.  You could do that, according to the New York draft laws of the time, and many wealthy men did just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
