<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TWITS IN MCCAIN CAMP MISFIRE IN PALIN ATTACKS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 02:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pan_theFrog</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1710668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pan_theFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1710668</guid>
		<description>"70% of all attacks on Palin were negative"
is kind of like saying that the rookie walked onto the battlefield, and 70% of all shots where directed at her. Maybe it is due to her not knowing how to properly work her way around on a battle field?

I'd love to see Palin spend the next 4 years allowing America to learn more about her. Say an in depth interveiw a month on different topics. Going deeper then sound bites. Explain her platform and dreams for America. Show us just what kind of energy expert she is. What is she learning, what books and papers has she read. If she can't get an interview, then post a 15 minute video on YouTube. Explain her views on evolution, seperation of church and state, same sex marriage, and progressive taxes.

If she does this, and is as good as many think she is, then she should be a shoe in for President in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;70% of all attacks on Palin were negative&#8221;<br />
is kind of like saying that the rookie walked onto the battlefield, and 70% of all shots where directed at her. Maybe it is due to her not knowing how to properly work her way around on a battle field?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see Palin spend the next 4 years allowing America to learn more about her. Say an in depth interveiw a month on different topics. Going deeper then sound bites. Explain her platform and dreams for America. Show us just what kind of energy expert she is. What is she learning, what books and papers has she read. If she can&#8217;t get an interview, then post a 15 minute video on YouTube. Explain her views on evolution, seperation of church and state, same sex marriage, and progressive taxes.</p>
<p>If she does this, and is as good as many think she is, then she should be a shoe in for President in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobwire</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1705890</link>
		<dc:creator>bobwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1705890</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin is or is not a rising star in Republican politics. 

Can you as a party offer up someone dumber than W? You just might in 2012.

You will get behind this poor idiot because she passes your litmus tests, or you will not.

Nothing to the base is more important.

Palin 2012, just try and go for it! How will it feel to be smarter than the candidate?

Get real, or go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is or is not a rising star in Republican politics. </p>
<p>Can you as a party offer up someone dumber than W? You just might in 2012.</p>
<p>You will get behind this poor idiot because she passes your litmus tests, or you will not.</p>
<p>Nothing to the base is more important.</p>
<p>Palin 2012, just try and go for it! How will it feel to be smarter than the candidate?</p>
<p>Get real, or go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funny man</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1705763</link>
		<dc:creator>funny man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1705763</guid>
		<description>Pythagorus,
my words indeed; good, productive intellectual discourse is the medicine the doctor ordered not Coulter etc.
I do see the populist appeal of Sarah Palin but not the road forward and as I have said on this blog before she is not the most intellectually inquisitive person nicely said. BTW, I also don't think we need leaders or leadership to get this going to paraphrase 'Yes we can'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pythagorus,<br />
my words indeed; good, productive intellectual discourse is the medicine the doctor ordered not Coulter etc.<br />
I do see the populist appeal of Sarah Palin but not the road forward and as I have said on this blog before she is not the most intellectually inquisitive person nicely said. BTW, I also don&#8217;t think we need leaders or leadership to get this going to paraphrase &#8216;Yes we can&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Burns</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1705347</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1705347</guid>
		<description>I think next time Sarah Palin has to get a support team around her that really want her to win.

 Without her this time round John McCain would have been lucky to get 30% of the vote.

He was up against what was little short of being 'Organized Crime'.

John McCain lost because he remained a Gentleman thoughout, but you don't win elections being 'nice'.

Put simply and totally missed by the electorate John McCain was all that was 'GOOD'. The other one represented all that was'EVIL'.

And as in the movies its the bad guys that get all the attention!
 
When the wheels and everything else falls off the wagon in a very short time will the MSM etc even notice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think next time Sarah Palin has to get a support team around her that really want her to win.</p>
<p> Without her this time round John McCain would have been lucky to get 30% of the vote.</p>
<p>He was up against what was little short of being &#8216;Organized Crime&#8217;.</p>
<p>John McCain lost because he remained a Gentleman thoughout, but you don&#8217;t win elections being &#8216;nice&#8217;.</p>
<p>Put simply and totally missed by the electorate John McCain was all that was &#8216;GOOD&#8217;. The other one represented all that was&#8217;EVIL&#8217;.</p>
<p>And as in the movies its the bad guys that get all the attention!</p>
<p>When the wheels and everything else falls off the wagon in a very short time will the MSM etc even notice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: racer X</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1705159</link>
		<dc:creator>racer X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1705159</guid>
		<description>Always remember intelligence can be learned, common sense is innate.
George Washington was ridiculed for his lack of intelligence and fancy college pedigree.   He is the best President this nation has ever had.  Why, because he had something no college can instill today, integrity and honesty.
We shall see what Obama can accomplish. However a victory speech that already aims to lower the bar is not a good sign. 
That said Obama's campaign was managed by brilliant people, they made him shine.  Now on his own it may become a pay of pigs. 
Remember Obama was an average student in his prep school.  It was not until he went to elite leftist establishments that he became a star.  I have yet to hear where Obama is a genius.  Kissinger is a genius, diabolical, yet a genius in his pragmatic realism.
Sickening is correct.
Sarah Palin is being smeared by ex-Bush 43 campaign workers.  Bush 43 workers were in charge of her for some odd reason.  This is the failure, one of many, of the McCain campaign.
Bush 43 wanted McCain to loose.  That is why the timing of the financial meltdown benefited Obama.  Timing is everything.
Now his people must put the blame on Sarah Palin so it is not an indictment against his gross incompetence.
Bush and McCain lost this election NOT Sarah Palin.
Sarah did her job well.  She also delivered a hell of a campaign speech at the RNC.
Compare that to bumbling bush who has destroyed the GOP.  Or McCain who was a downer to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always remember intelligence can be learned, common sense is innate.<br />
George Washington was ridiculed for his lack of intelligence and fancy college pedigree.   He is the best President this nation has ever had.  Why, because he had something no college can instill today, integrity and honesty.<br />
We shall see what Obama can accomplish. However a victory speech that already aims to lower the bar is not a good sign.<br />
That said Obama&#8217;s campaign was managed by brilliant people, they made him shine.  Now on his own it may become a pay of pigs.<br />
Remember Obama was an average student in his prep school.  It was not until he went to elite leftist establishments that he became a star.  I have yet to hear where Obama is a genius.  Kissinger is a genius, diabolical, yet a genius in his pragmatic realism.<br />
Sickening is correct.<br />
Sarah Palin is being smeared by ex-Bush 43 campaign workers.  Bush 43 workers were in charge of her for some odd reason.  This is the failure, one of many, of the McCain campaign.<br />
Bush 43 wanted McCain to loose.  That is why the timing of the financial meltdown benefited Obama.  Timing is everything.<br />
Now his people must put the blame on Sarah Palin so it is not an indictment against his gross incompetence.<br />
Bush and McCain lost this election NOT Sarah Palin.<br />
Sarah did her job well.  She also delivered a hell of a campaign speech at the RNC.<br />
Compare that to bumbling bush who has destroyed the GOP.  Or McCain who was a downer to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyperIon</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1704805</link>
		<dc:creator>HyperIon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1704805</guid>
		<description>Gayle Miller wrote: only when she blew free of that nonsense did we see the real and very excitingly competence she exuded

seriously, when was that? i can't keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gayle Miller wrote: only when she blew free of that nonsense did we see the real and very excitingly competence she exuded</p>
<p>seriously, when was that? i can&#8217;t keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Miller</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1704438</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1704438</guid>
		<description>Would this discussion even be taking place if Sarah Palin had been a man?  No.  Absolutely not.  The proof of that is our esteemed Vice President-elect, Joe Biden, the one and only gaffemaster! His gaffes were far more numerous than Mrs. Palin's and more egregious considering that he is supposedly so experienced.  In truth, he is a gasbag idiot!

I am ashamed to the very core of my being that John S. McCain has not spoken up in a clear and uncompromising manner in defense of this extraordinary woman.  And to those of you who are criticizing this woman in terms that are eerily reminiscent of the MSM foul canards, you might want to take a step back, lay off the Kool Aid and exercise a tad bit of critical thinking!  The woman was overmanaged by people who did not have her best interests at heart and only when she blew free of that nonsense did we see the real and very excitingly competence she exuded.

Sarah Palin has a future but given the bloviating going on in this comments section, the Republican Party may not - unless of course all y'all do some serious maturing and THINKING.  I'm an old fart of 66 and I've seen the "bigwigs" of the Republican Party in operation my entire life - even been part of the in-crowd in my time. The Party needs new blood and a more focused and clearheaded way of thinking.  And backbiting amateurs are NOT the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this discussion even be taking place if Sarah Palin had been a man?  No.  Absolutely not.  The proof of that is our esteemed Vice President-elect, Joe Biden, the one and only gaffemaster! His gaffes were far more numerous than Mrs. Palin&#8217;s and more egregious considering that he is supposedly so experienced.  In truth, he is a gasbag idiot!</p>
<p>I am ashamed to the very core of my being that John S. McCain has not spoken up in a clear and uncompromising manner in defense of this extraordinary woman.  And to those of you who are criticizing this woman in terms that are eerily reminiscent of the MSM foul canards, you might want to take a step back, lay off the Kool Aid and exercise a tad bit of critical thinking!  The woman was overmanaged by people who did not have her best interests at heart and only when she blew free of that nonsense did we see the real and very excitingly competence she exuded.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin has a future but given the bloviating going on in this comments section, the Republican Party may not - unless of course all y&#8217;all do some serious maturing and THINKING.  I&#8217;m an old fart of 66 and I&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;bigwigs&#8221; of the Republican Party in operation my entire life - even been part of the in-crowd in my time. The Party needs new blood and a more focused and clearheaded way of thinking.  And backbiting amateurs are NOT the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGomez</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1704288</link>
		<dc:creator>CGomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1704288</guid>
		<description>The thing is, this inexperienced candidate made one of the most profound statements I have heard in a long time:

"Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you're going to be expected to be called upon and help."

This statement was attacked as Palin insisting the US would go to war with Russia.  But think about it for a second.  In the Clinton/W.Bush admin's rush to admit countries to NATO, has ANYONE stopped to ask what that means if these countries are attacked.  For a brief moment in time, Sarah Palin did.

Whaddya know.

"It doesn't have to lead to war and it doesn't have to lead, as I said, to a cold war, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries,"

The headlines however?

Palin: U.S. might have to go to war with Russia
Palin: War with Russia may be needed
Palin won't rule out war with Russia

Talk about misdirection.  What the hell do these people think "It doesn't have to be war" means?

I work with many people who _actually believe_ Palin said "she could see Russia from her house."  They also said "Did you see Palin on SNL talking about 2012?"

Me: "That was Tina Fey."

"Who?  It was McCain and Palin wasn't it?  And Palin with that Hillary look-alike."

Me: "Huh".

I do think Palin probably was not ready for the national stage, and the McCain campaign has probably ruined what could have been a bright future star.

Carter, Clinton, and W. Bush certainly knew just about as much about foreign policy when they took the presidency.  Bush famously failed that "quiz" that was thrust on him during the campaign.

And we're talking about the vice-presidency here, not these inexperienced presidential candidates.

Biden certainly is no foreign policy expert.  The only evidence needed is when he completely made up a story about Hezbollah in the VP debate.  He just made it up.  He also just made up that Obama took some kind of stand about NATO troops.

Not a peep from the media.  That is a _real_ gaffe... not a fake one like "You're no Jack Kennedy" (which was a low insult to say to a man who was specifically asked by the moderator to choose a past American hero to compare himself to.  He chose.  Your insult of the answer was low and immoral).  Not a fake gaffe like looking at your watch.  Not a fake gaffe like sighing.  That was a real deficiency in knowledge and preparedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, this inexperienced candidate made one of the most profound statements I have heard in a long time:</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you&#8217;re going to be expected to be called upon and help.&#8221;</p>
<p>This statement was attacked as Palin insisting the US would go to war with Russia.  But think about it for a second.  In the Clinton/W.Bush admin&#8217;s rush to admit countries to NATO, has ANYONE stopped to ask what that means if these countries are attacked.  For a brief moment in time, Sarah Palin did.</p>
<p>Whaddya know.</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t have to lead to war and it doesn&#8217;t have to lead, as I said, to a cold war, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries,&#8221;</p>
<p>The headlines however?</p>
<p>Palin: U.S. might have to go to war with Russia<br />
Palin: War with Russia may be needed<br />
Palin won&#8217;t rule out war with Russia</p>
<p>Talk about misdirection.  What the hell do these people think &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t have to be war&#8221; means?</p>
<p>I work with many people who _actually believe_ Palin said &#8220;she could see Russia from her house.&#8221;  They also said &#8220;Did you see Palin on SNL talking about 2012?&#8221;</p>
<p>Me: &#8220;That was Tina Fey.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Who?  It was McCain and Palin wasn&#8217;t it?  And Palin with that Hillary look-alike.&#8221;</p>
<p>Me: &#8220;Huh&#8221;.</p>
<p>I do think Palin probably was not ready for the national stage, and the McCain campaign has probably ruined what could have been a bright future star.</p>
<p>Carter, Clinton, and W. Bush certainly knew just about as much about foreign policy when they took the presidency.  Bush famously failed that &#8220;quiz&#8221; that was thrust on him during the campaign.</p>
<p>And we&#8217;re talking about the vice-presidency here, not these inexperienced presidential candidates.</p>
<p>Biden certainly is no foreign policy expert.  The only evidence needed is when he completely made up a story about Hezbollah in the VP debate.  He just made it up.  He also just made up that Obama took some kind of stand about NATO troops.</p>
<p>Not a peep from the media.  That is a _real_ gaffe&#8230; not a fake one like &#8220;You&#8217;re no Jack Kennedy&#8221; (which was a low insult to say to a man who was specifically asked by the moderator to choose a past American hero to compare himself to.  He chose.  Your insult of the answer was low and immoral).  Not a fake gaffe like looking at your watch.  Not a fake gaffe like sighing.  That was a real deficiency in knowledge and preparedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jambrowski</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1704204</link>
		<dc:creator>jambrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1704204</guid>
		<description>gracias rick, me thinks the Palin we saw through the Fu#@ed up monocles of the media and the McCain camp is not the real Palin. whether i am right or wrong, their actions are deplorable, always looking for the scapegoat, good god what year is it? friggin a man, the campaign itself is to blame, they screwed the pooch and then continued to poke the dead dog for months on end. good to see you are alive and well rick, keep it going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gracias rick, me thinks the Palin we saw through the Fu#@ed up monocles of the media and the McCain camp is not the real Palin. whether i am right or wrong, their actions are deplorable, always looking for the scapegoat, good god what year is it? friggin a man, the campaign itself is to blame, they screwed the pooch and then continued to poke the dead dog for months on end. good to see you are alive and well rick, keep it going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-1704189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/06/twits-in-mccain-camp-misfire-in-palin-attacks/#comment-1704189</guid>
		<description>Oh, and one more problem: The docrinaire right-wingers can't stand the populists they depend on for power, e.g., Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one more problem: The docrinaire right-wingers can&#8217;t stand the populists they depend on for power, e.g., Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
