Comments on: HEZBULLAH SEEKING REFERENDUM ON KEEPING THEIR GUNS http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/16/hezbullah-seeking-referendum-on-keeping-their-guns/ Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto. Thu, 28 May 2026 13:50:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Nagarajan Sivakumar http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/16/hezbullah-seeking-referendum-on-keeping-their-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-1725409 Nagarajan Sivakumar Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:15:17 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/16/hezbullah-seeking-referendum-on-keeping-their-guns/#comment-1725409 grognard, Right on. Who is going to enforce the will of the majority when Hizbollah refuses to disarm? also, is pretty obvious that Hizbollah wouldnt allow the vote if they were not confident of a victory. Even better they now have an ally in the White House who thinks that they have "legitimate" claims.. I'd love to hear what Michael Totten has to say about this. and yeah, Seymour Hersh is such a shame for a journalist. He should be working for the National Inquirer. grognard,
Right on. Who is going to enforce the will of the majority when Hizbollah refuses to disarm?

also, is pretty obvious that Hizbollah wouldnt allow the vote if they were not confident of a victory.

Even better they now have an ally in the White House who thinks that they have “legitimate” claims..

I’d love to hear what Michael Totten has to say about this. and yeah, Seymour Hersh is such a shame for a journalist. He should be working for the National Inquirer.

]]> By: grognard http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/16/hezbullah-seeking-referendum-on-keeping-their-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-1724461 grognard Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:59:49 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/11/16/hezbullah-seeking-referendum-on-keeping-their-guns/#comment-1724461 Even if the vote goes against Hezbullah who will step in to confiscate the weapons? They could turn in some weapons and claim that was the full extent of their armory. Every other party would know it was BS and the present situation would still exist. They might loose some credibility but why would they care, ultimately it's weapons that decides the issue and they certainly will not give up that source of power. Even if the vote goes against Hezbullah who will step in to confiscate the weapons? They could turn in some weapons and claim that was the full extent of their armory. Every other party would know it was BS and the present situation would still exist. They might loose some credibility but why would they care, ultimately it’s weapons that decides the issue and they certainly will not give up that source of power.

]]>