Comments on: BLOODTHIRSTY JEWS BRUTALLY MURDER HAMAS BABIES

By: David

David — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:25:13 +0000

Oh yes, with the full support of the American tax dollar.

By: David

David — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:21:55 +0000

Why would anyone expect a people not to respond violently when blocaded/starved/deprived/ their land stolen, illegal jew approved settlements, walls, and etc. come to my house and treat me that way, see what happens.

By: prospero

prospero — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:01:08 +0000

A lot of war, it seems to me, involves doing pretty much the same thying over and over again until one or the other side (not bored and frustrated viewers) gets tired of it, which is to say no longer has the wiull or capacity to sustain their efforts. If Israel hasn’t yet brought the Palestinians to that point, the answer is to intensify their efforts, not cease them. It’s hard to imagine a more trivial reason for absorbing attacks without responding than fear of looking like a “bully”–anyone who ever wins a war would have to look like a bully once they started winning. Let’s hope most suporters of Israel have more fortitude and common sense than Chance Haywood.

By: gokart-mozart

gokart-mozart — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:16:40 +0000

Geek Esq. said: “To put it another way: if force doesn’t need to be proportionate, would you consider Israel carpetbombing Gaza until everyone was dead legal?”Inter arma silent leges.What is the source of this “law” that would make carpet bombing Gaza “illegal”? Who or what is the sovereign from which this “law” issues? And what is the power which compels obedience to this “law”?

By: Chance_Haywood

Chance_Haywood — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:44:05 +0000

I got banned yesterday from redstate.com yesterday for posting what I’m about to basically post.

I am no longer willing to support Israel until they change their course of action in dealing with the situation at hand. This is not to meant to be taken as I’m suddenly supporting Hamas. Frankly I’m inclined to never support them.

However for over a decade Israel has acted in response to these events in the same manner and nothing has changed. It is therefor time to consider a different course of action. Either man up and kick them out of the contested areas or sit back and wait for them to screw up the support they do have in world opinion. The with the support you have you can force a peaceful resolution to the issue or you can force a non-peaceful conclusion to it.

Yes I’m actually suggesting they not respond to these missile attacks. Since 2000 with the hundreds of launches that have happen only 14 Israelis have been killed. We essentially have a fight going on between a kid in middle school and a kid in high school. Every time Israel responds it looks like they are being a bully.

Certainly they have every right to respond to this attacks. After ten years of this I’m tired of watching it. Even if I am over here and not there. It is insanity to expect different results from the same actions. Therefor I’m not long willing to support the insanity any longer. And neither should anyone else in America.

By: JWS

JWS — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:38:11 +0000

You know, as with most things, this can be distilled down rather easily: Hamas/ Palestine bad, Israel good. For libtards, it’s easiest understood as a sort of rock, paper, scissors game: good beats bad.

This is a perfect example of needing adults to be, well, adults. “Look at all those dead Hamasians (ok, whatever)!!!”, the child (liberal) screams. “Yup, look at em….” the adult (conservative) says…

By: prospero

prospero — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:00:00 +0000

If we imagine a Middle East with no Israel, and therefore no effective resistance to the ambitions of Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and al Qaeda, and then consider whether such a Middle East would be preferable to the present one, we will have the answer to David’s question.

By: cdor

cdor — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:40:27 +0000

There are no innocent “palestinians”. They elected of their own free will, Hamas. Their government has ALWAYS stated as their ultimate goal the total destruction of Israel and death to all Jews. They train their children to hate Jews. These children are psychotics by their 6th birthday.

Most of the posters here are NUTS. If I were an Israeli, I’d tell you all to kiss my A$$.

Unfortunately, many Israelis are just like you. Their need to be liked preceeds their need to survive.

By: cdor

cdor — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:31:36 +0000

There never were “Palestinians”, there are no “Palestinians” now, and there should never be “Palestinians”.

There were no Israeli arab muslims, there are no Israeli arab muslims now, and there should never be any Israeli arab muslims.

If Israel does not adopt the proceeding two sentences as their National Mantra and remove all arab muslims from their land, as arabs have removed all jews from their land, then (and my heart sinks as I say this) there will be no Israel in 75 years.

When I say Israeli land, I mean ALL of Gaza and Judea and Samaria.

By: David

David — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:03:29 +0000

The question is not what Israel is doing to Hamas, or what Hamas has done to deserve it, or who did what to whom how recently, when and how often.

The question is why the United States is subsidizing it all. The United States has no, zero, nada critical national interest at stake in Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Right now, everything Israel does in the Middle East is seen, correctly, as being done by the United States. It is a mystery to me how any American can think that is a good thing for the United States.

The elimination of military and economic aid to Israel is in the best interests of the United States, and should happen. It would have the side benefit of removing the basis upon which Americans can legitimately claim a right to be critical of Israeli military policies.

Why, when so many Americans feel that way, are the political elites from the farthest right-wing Republican, to the leadership of the Democratic party, including every notable gasbag in the corporate media, unwilling even to discuss why American policy to Israel should always and forward take the form of an unquestioning blank check?