<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHY GEITHNER HAS GOT TO GO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756657</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756657</guid>
		<description>In the new "era of responsibility" just how can we have a Secretary Of the Treasury that give "I Dunno" as the reason he didn't pay his taxes ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the new &#8220;era of responsibility&#8221; just how can we have a Secretary Of the Treasury that give &#8220;I Dunno&#8221; as the reason he didn&#8217;t pay his taxes ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756572</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756572</guid>
		<description>I just love the excuse that Geithner is so good that this "little problem" should be overlooked.

Wasn't this the same excuse invoked to use the extraordinary interrogation techniques (AKA torture) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love the excuse that Geithner is so good that this &#8220;little problem&#8221; should be overlooked.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t this the same excuse invoked to use the extraordinary interrogation techniques (AKA torture) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagarajan Sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756552</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagarajan Sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756552</guid>
		<description>Folks,
       For those of you who think that we are "assuming" that Geithner is guilty, you are too trusting of our Government officials.

Tim Geithner is the same age as Obama - 47 years old. He started his career in 1985 with Kissinger and Associates. so he has been receiving a W2 for most of his career and paying payroll taxes for the same period of time. It was only in 2001 that he started working for the IMF.

So he suddenly now forgets to pay payoll taxes ? Or does'nt know that you have to pay these taxes as an American worker working for an International organization located in America ?

My best guess is that Geithner just didnt care. He knew that if the IRS came back to him later, he could always pay it back along with the penalty. If not, he could get away scot free.

In the mean time he now has 36,000$ that he can invest in the markets in and make a neat little profit - so even if he gets caught later and has to pay a penalty he could possibly more than cover for it. Of course it also means that he has to pay increased capital gains taxes, but what if he could atleast avoid payroll taxes to the tune of 36 Grand ?

Geithner also figured that even though this could be an embarrassment down the line, it would nt exactly be career threatening - not when people think that you are the protege of big shots like Larry Summers or Robert Rubin.


This guy can take risks or what ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks,<br />
       For those of you who think that we are &#8220;assuming&#8221; that Geithner is guilty, you are too trusting of our Government officials.</p>
<p>Tim Geithner is the same age as Obama - 47 years old. He started his career in 1985 with Kissinger and Associates. so he has been receiving a W2 for most of his career and paying payroll taxes for the same period of time. It was only in 2001 that he started working for the IMF.</p>
<p>So he suddenly now forgets to pay payoll taxes ? Or does&#8217;nt know that you have to pay these taxes as an American worker working for an International organization located in America ?</p>
<p>My best guess is that Geithner just didnt care. He knew that if the IRS came back to him later, he could always pay it back along with the penalty. If not, he could get away scot free.</p>
<p>In the mean time he now has 36,000$ that he can invest in the markets in and make a neat little profit - so even if he gets caught later and has to pay a penalty he could possibly more than cover for it. Of course it also means that he has to pay increased capital gains taxes, but what if he could atleast avoid payroll taxes to the tune of 36 Grand ?</p>
<p>Geithner also figured that even though this could be an embarrassment down the line, it would nt exactly be career threatening - not when people think that you are the protege of big shots like Larry Summers or Robert Rubin.</p>
<p>This guy can take risks or what ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdor</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756551</link>
		<dc:creator>cdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756551</guid>
		<description>I'll celebrate that shiskabob and all his brethren are  celebrating after eight years of being depressed.

I'll celebrate that McCain isn't in charge, because I think he is basically clueless and would have done absolutely nothing to further conservatism.

And I'll pray (because prayer is all I've got to go with here, sorry Rick) that Obama isn't who I think he is and that he will help lead the U.S. out of these economic doldrums while keeping our western civilization safe from the onslaught of Islamofascism.

I will remain, however, skeptical and critical for I do not believe the Messiah has arrived.

Sorry about that, shishkabob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll celebrate that shiskabob and all his brethren are  celebrating after eight years of being depressed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll celebrate that McCain isn&#8217;t in charge, because I think he is basically clueless and would have done absolutely nothing to further conservatism.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll pray (because prayer is all I&#8217;ve got to go with here, sorry Rick) that Obama isn&#8217;t who I think he is and that he will help lead the U.S. out of these economic doldrums while keeping our western civilization safe from the onslaught of Islamofascism.</p>
<p>I will remain, however, skeptical and critical for I do not believe the Messiah has arrived.</p>
<p>Sorry about that, shishkabob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara in VA</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara in VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756550</guid>
		<description>shishkabob #17

Popcorn is fitting, since this is a drama-comedy, and wine will relax you for the seduction, eh?  Enjoy stroking yourself through it.  Sorry to be vulgar (I'm not normally so) but there's no other way to understand people like you without envisioning non-producers laying-about on the couch.

Unfortunately, Atlas Shrugged is a long novel, and we haven't even made it to Part II yet. 

Oh, PS, I'll be working, earning money/tax revenues to help pay for your lifestyle.

saraforamerica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shishkabob #17</p>
<p>Popcorn is fitting, since this is a drama-comedy, and wine will relax you for the seduction, eh?  Enjoy stroking yourself through it.  Sorry to be vulgar (I&#8217;m not normally so) but there&#8217;s no other way to understand people like you without envisioning non-producers laying-about on the couch.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Atlas Shrugged is a long novel, and we haven&#8217;t even made it to Part II yet. </p>
<p>Oh, PS, I&#8217;ll be working, earning money/tax revenues to help pay for your lifestyle.</p>
<p>saraforamerica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shishkabob</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756547</link>
		<dc:creator>shishkabob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756547</guid>
		<description>Optimism is sweeping the nation. People are happy to see Barack Hussein Obama become the new President.

I'm going to make popcorn for the swearing in. Maybe open a bottle of  wine.

What are you guys doing to celebrate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optimism is sweeping the nation. People are happy to see Barack Hussein Obama become the new President.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to make popcorn for the swearing in. Maybe open a bottle of  wine.</p>
<p>What are you guys doing to celebrate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the CPA</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756546</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756546</guid>
		<description>KBK sez:

"Prepared his own tax returns? With what, a pencil? He’s going to be in charge of the IRS and didn’t notice that his W-2 had no FICA withholding? Turbotax didn’t try to remit FICA on the income earned? He doesn’t know what FICA is?"

Dude, a foreign entity (the IMF) doesn't send W-2's.  At best he got a statement.  If you want to believe he just tried to get away with something, fine, but at least know what the hell you're talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KBK sez:</p>
<p>&#8220;Prepared his own tax returns? With what, a pencil? He’s going to be in charge of the IRS and didn’t notice that his W-2 had no FICA withholding? Turbotax didn’t try to remit FICA on the income earned? He doesn’t know what FICA is?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dude, a foreign entity (the IMF) doesn&#8217;t send W-2&#8217;s.  At best he got a statement.  If you want to believe he just tried to get away with something, fine, but at least know what the hell you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajacksonian</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756543</link>
		<dc:creator>ajacksonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756543</guid>
		<description>No, his mistake was &lt;a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/66337/" rel="nofollow"&gt;not using TurboTax&lt;/a&gt; which flags the lack of contributions.  He isn't smart enough to buy a program to remind him he should pay his taxes.  And if he couldn't shell out a bit more for H&#38;R block and say it was their fault, then just what sort of idiot are we getting?  He certainly makes enough to afford decent tax preparation... or is it only the 'little people' who are supposed to do that and if you make over a certain amount you can forego it?

Yes, indeed, if you do your own taxes you probably get it wrong: that is the problem with the tax code.  If he doesn't realize *that* then I really, truly, don't want him in Treasury... where this sort of thing would prevent him from being hired on the civil side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, his mistake was <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/66337/" rel="nofollow">not using TurboTax</a> which flags the lack of contributions.  He isn&#8217;t smart enough to buy a program to remind him he should pay his taxes.  And if he couldn&#8217;t shell out a bit more for H&amp;R block and say it was their fault, then just what sort of idiot are we getting?  He certainly makes enough to afford decent tax preparation&#8230; or is it only the &#8216;little people&#8217; who are supposed to do that and if you make over a certain amount you can forego it?</p>
<p>Yes, indeed, if you do your own taxes you probably get it wrong: that is the problem with the tax code.  If he doesn&#8217;t realize *that* then I really, truly, don&#8217;t want him in Treasury&#8230; where this sort of thing would prevent him from being hired on the civil side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdor</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756542</link>
		<dc:creator>cdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756542</guid>
		<description>I don't give a poop what or how much the MSM says about Geithner. I can read and judge for myself. Rick's reply to M Reynolds, kbk, and sara...all right on the money.

In this great big country with the worlds largest economy, don't tell me this guy is all we've got. Our congresscritters simply are scared and gutless. 

"Bu, but he knows Paulson. And,and he knows how to do what Paulson was doing. And,and..."

Yea right, and look where that's gotten us. So what's the conclusion?

Simply this: Geithner's either a cheat, a swindler, an idiot, or he's got his head up his ass.

But he sure is brilliant! Better hire him right now or the country's goin' down the tubes.

Yikes!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give a poop what or how much the MSM says about Geithner. I can read and judge for myself. Rick&#8217;s reply to M Reynolds, kbk, and sara&#8230;all right on the money.</p>
<p>In this great big country with the worlds largest economy, don&#8217;t tell me this guy is all we&#8217;ve got. Our congresscritters simply are scared and gutless. </p>
<p>&#8220;Bu, but he knows Paulson. And,and he knows how to do what Paulson was doing. And,and&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yea right, and look where that&#8217;s gotten us. So what&#8217;s the conclusion?</p>
<p>Simply this: Geithner&#8217;s either a cheat, a swindler, an idiot, or he&#8217;s got his head up his ass.</p>
<p>But he sure is brilliant! Better hire him right now or the country&#8217;s goin&#8217; down the tubes.</p>
<p>Yikes!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/01/16/why-geithner-has-got-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1756541</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3192#comment-1756541</guid>
		<description>Your "oops" is fact-free and assumption-heavy.  

The IMF spokesman is operating from an absurd premise:  that his ethics office has a clear and complete picture of all tax problems involving IMF members allowing him to declaim authoritatively on the incidence of tax problems among IMF employees. This is nonsense.

Beyond that we have unnamed sources expressing a sort of vague dubiousness.  

And all of that in the National Review.  
 
You are still operating on the assumption that Geithner must have known, and nothing has yet supported that position.  It remains an assumption.  I'm not advancing the opposite assumption that he must not have known, just saying it's entirely possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;oops&#8221; is fact-free and assumption-heavy.  </p>
<p>The IMF spokesman is operating from an absurd premise:  that his ethics office has a clear and complete picture of all tax problems involving IMF members allowing him to declaim authoritatively on the incidence of tax problems among IMF employees. This is nonsense.</p>
<p>Beyond that we have unnamed sources expressing a sort of vague dubiousness.  </p>
<p>And all of that in the National Review.  </p>
<p>You are still operating on the assumption that Geithner must have known, and nothing has yet supported that position.  It remains an assumption.  I&#8217;m not advancing the opposite assumption that he must not have known, just saying it&#8217;s entirely possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
