<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A TIPPING POINT ON OBAMA IN SIGHT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tucson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758379</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758379</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So do ‘real’ conservative politicians exist anywhere besides the imagination? I suggest there aren’t many.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That seems to be a slight dilemma for the Republican party. Interestingly, there are very very few people these days who claim to be a Republican. All I get anymore is, "I'm a conservative, not a Republican." 

So, are conservatives, who always vote Republican, Republicans? Logically speaking, I would think not. But as far as elections are concerned, they're a guaranteed vote, so what's the real difference? 



It kinda leaves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So do ‘real’ conservative politicians exist anywhere besides the imagination? I suggest there aren’t many.</p></blockquote>
<p>That seems to be a slight dilemma for the Republican party. Interestingly, there are very very few people these days who claim to be a Republican. All I get anymore is, &#8220;I&#8217;m a conservative, not a Republican.&#8221; </p>
<p>So, are conservatives, who always vote Republican, Republicans? Logically speaking, I would think not. But as far as elections are concerned, they&#8217;re a guaranteed vote, so what&#8217;s the real difference? </p>
<p>It kinda leaves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758377</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758377</guid>
		<description>Chuck Tuscon,

I agree with you. It depends on who you ask. 

I was asking Moshe ben David if there were any conservative politicians by the criteria he laid out in post #14. I'm not sure Reagan even meets that standard, so I asked if there really is a "conservative" politician anywhere besides our imaginations.


Without speaking for Moshe, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham, Phil Graham and Tom Delay do not seem to fit his criteria; yet, many consider them good Republicans and/or conservatives. 

So do 'real' conservative politicians exist anywhere besides the imagination? I suggest there aren't many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Tuscon,</p>
<p>I agree with you. It depends on who you ask. </p>
<p>I was asking Moshe ben David if there were any conservative politicians by the criteria he laid out in post #14. I&#8217;m not sure Reagan even meets that standard, so I asked if there really is a &#8220;conservative&#8221; politician anywhere besides our imaginations.</p>
<p>Without speaking for Moshe, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham, Phil Graham and Tom Delay do not seem to fit his criteria; yet, many consider them good Republicans and/or conservatives. </p>
<p>So do &#8216;real&#8217; conservative politicians exist anywhere besides the imagination? I suggest there aren&#8217;t many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tucson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758373</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758373</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Do real conservatives exist anywhere besides our imaginations?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The definition of conservative is radically different depending on which conservative you ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do real conservatives exist anywhere besides our imaginations?</p></blockquote>
<p>The definition of conservative is radically different depending on which conservative you ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758367</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758367</guid>
		<description>Moshe ben David,

So for at least 15 years Republicans have not been conservative in the way you describe. This includes James Baker. I get it.

What about Reagan? My recollection of history isn't perfect, but he expanded government spending enormously while in office. He grew government. If the patron saint of "conservatism" does not fit the bill, then perhaps conservative presidents do not exist in the modern era. Surely nobody thinks of Nixon as conservative.

Do real conservatives exist anywhere besides our imaginations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moshe ben David,</p>
<p>So for at least 15 years Republicans have not been conservative in the way you describe. This includes James Baker. I get it.</p>
<p>What about Reagan? My recollection of history isn&#8217;t perfect, but he expanded government spending enormously while in office. He grew government. If the patron saint of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; does not fit the bill, then perhaps conservative presidents do not exist in the modern era. Surely nobody thinks of Nixon as conservative.</p>
<p>Do real conservatives exist anywhere besides our imaginations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe ben David</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758352</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe ben David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758352</guid>
		<description>My response was up above.  Apparently you can't comprehend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response was up above.  Apparently you can&#8217;t comprehend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758349</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758349</guid>
		<description>Moshe ben David,

The chief of staff for Ronald Reagan
The Treasury Secretary for Ronald Regan
The Secretary of State for G.H.W. Bush
said this:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b3f299a6-0697-11de-ab0f-000077b07658,dwp_uuid=81377dd2-0733-11de-9294-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

What is your response?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moshe ben David,</p>
<p>The chief of staff for Ronald Reagan<br />
The Treasury Secretary for Ronald Regan<br />
The Secretary of State for G.H.W. Bush<br />
said this:<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b3f299a6-0697-11de-ab0f-000077b07658,dwp_uuid=81377dd2-0733-11de-9294-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b3f299a6-0697-11de-ab0f-000077b07658,dwp_uuid=81377dd2-0733-11de-9294-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1</a></p>
<p>What is your response?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758347</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758347</guid>
		<description>Moshe:

You're asking an essentially irrelevant question.  We're in the realm of politics, not of science or even of political science.  You and a thousand other people can argue over what the true, academic definition of "conservatism" is.  Just as Marxists will argue Lenin vs. Trotsky vs. Mao and engage in endless scholastic exercises over the "true" Marxism, so conservatives will do.

It doesn't matter at this point.  What matters is that we saw what happened to the USSR and to the PRC and to Cuba.  That's communism, regardless of what some Marxist professor may have to say on the subject.

We saw what happened under Reagan, under Mr. Bush pere, under Newt Gingrich, and under Mr. Bush fils.  As a practical political matter that's conservatism.  It has been tried, and it has failed.  

From this point you can continue the academic debate.  In fact I think it's an interesting thing to do and might actually be useful somewhere down the road.  But right now the conservative brand in politics means: cutting taxes, eliminating regulation, gay-bashing, race-baiting, pro-life, invading more-or-less randomly-chosen countries, and a style of expression that has rage and contempt at its core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moshe:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re asking an essentially irrelevant question.  We&#8217;re in the realm of politics, not of science or even of political science.  You and a thousand other people can argue over what the true, academic definition of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; is.  Just as Marxists will argue Lenin vs. Trotsky vs. Mao and engage in endless scholastic exercises over the &#8220;true&#8221; Marxism, so conservatives will do.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter at this point.  What matters is that we saw what happened to the USSR and to the PRC and to Cuba.  That&#8217;s communism, regardless of what some Marxist professor may have to say on the subject.</p>
<p>We saw what happened under Reagan, under Mr. Bush pere, under Newt Gingrich, and under Mr. Bush fils.  As a practical political matter that&#8217;s conservatism.  It has been tried, and it has failed.  </p>
<p>From this point you can continue the academic debate.  In fact I think it&#8217;s an interesting thing to do and might actually be useful somewhere down the road.  But right now the conservative brand in politics means: cutting taxes, eliminating regulation, gay-bashing, race-baiting, pro-life, invading more-or-less randomly-chosen countries, and a style of expression that has rage and contempt at its core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe ben David</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758335</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe ben David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758335</guid>
		<description>You know what?  

I'm human.  So I had to re-read Michael's post again and catch the problem.


Just Damn.  No, Hell No, A thousand times, freaking, NO!  This is not a result of conservatism.  THAT's the problem.  

You cannot name for me a single thing that has come out of Washington DC since the Reagan Administraion that even remotely is conservative.  Point to a law or a policy.  Name it.

 At the risk of offending some people, I include the "War on Terror" because terror is merely a cowardly tactic.  We SHOULD be at war with Islamic Jihad or Wahabism and all it's adherent's.

But back to conservatism.  

First, I want you to define it.  What exactly is conservatism in your mind?

And to help you out, I consider Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell to be conservative thinkers.  Where do they go wrong?  How about you cite a quote from each one and tell us all how their thinking is flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m human.  So I had to re-read Michael&#8217;s post again and catch the problem.</p>
<p>Just Damn.  No, Hell No, A thousand times, freaking, NO!  This is not a result of conservatism.  THAT&#8217;s the problem.  </p>
<p>You cannot name for me a single thing that has come out of Washington DC since the Reagan Administraion that even remotely is conservative.  Point to a law or a policy.  Name it.</p>
<p> At the risk of offending some people, I include the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; because terror is merely a cowardly tactic.  We SHOULD be at war with Islamic Jihad or Wahabism and all it&#8217;s adherent&#8217;s.</p>
<p>But back to conservatism.  </p>
<p>First, I want you to define it.  What exactly is conservatism in your mind?</p>
<p>And to help you out, I consider Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell to be conservative thinkers.  Where do they go wrong?  How about you cite a quote from each one and tell us all how their thinking is flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sorry Republicans, But It&#8217;s Not Even The End Of The Beginning Yet</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758333</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sorry Republicans, But It&#8217;s Not Even The End Of The Beginning Yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758333</guid>
		<description>[...] Moran also believes that Tapscott is ahead of himself: [T]he idea that these facts have altered or are even in the process of altering the fundamental [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moran also believes that Tapscott is ahead of himself: [T]he idea that these facts have altered or are even in the process of altering the fundamental [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe ben David</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/07/a-tipping-point-on-obama-in-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-1758332</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe ben David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3469#comment-1758332</guid>
		<description>Okay then, Michael, 

Explicitly name for me the conservative policies that were enacted or enforced since 2000 that brought about the conditions we see today? 

I want specifics.  Name the bill or law.  How it was enforced.  Can you demonstrate how it affected the economy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay then, Michael, </p>
<p>Explicitly name for me the conservative policies that were enacted or enforced since 2000 that brought about the conditions we see today? </p>
<p>I want specifics.  Name the bill or law.  How it was enforced.  Can you demonstrate how it affected the economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
