<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A TEPID BUT REALISTIC DEFENSE OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN THE AIG MATTER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jackson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758537</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758537</guid>
		<description>Of course you would take the sunny side approach.  I mean why should we regard the White House kangaroo court treatment of Detroit executives, Rush Limbaugh, bank executives, and now AIG as anything other than an honest mistake.  

Doesn't every administration engage in two minutes of hate and try and protray an entire class of people as charactures that even Joe Stewart would disown?  Doesn't every administration shred the Constitution just to prove that you can get this kind of star chamber treatment if you anger us?

I heartily concur that no this treatment, which would be common place at Stalin's show trials or the People's Courts of Hitler, shouldn't be condemned as something out of the norm and are just as American as mom and apple pie.

We are getting to see how the lobster gets cooked.  Its going to be along four years.

What this blog needs is more David Frum, Brooks, and McCain just to keep the icy objectivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you would take the sunny side approach.  I mean why should we regard the White House kangaroo court treatment of Detroit executives, Rush Limbaugh, bank executives, and now AIG as anything other than an honest mistake.  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t every administration engage in two minutes of hate and try and protray an entire class of people as charactures that even Joe Stewart would disown?  Doesn&#8217;t every administration shred the Constitution just to prove that you can get this kind of star chamber treatment if you anger us?</p>
<p>I heartily concur that no this treatment, which would be common place at Stalin&#8217;s show trials or the People&#8217;s Courts of Hitler, shouldn&#8217;t be condemned as something out of the norm and are just as American as mom and apple pie.</p>
<p>We are getting to see how the lobster gets cooked.  Its going to be along four years.</p>
<p>What this blog needs is more David Frum, Brooks, and McCain just to keep the icy objectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Blog Weekly: 20 March 2009 &#124; U.S. Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758534</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Blog Weekly: 20 March 2009 &#124; U.S. Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758534</guid>
		<description>[...] &#34;A Tepid but Realistic Defense of the Obama Administration in the AIG Matter&#34; Originally published: &#160;19 March 2009 Submitted by: &#160;U.S. Common Sense Summary: &#160;Examining how the lack of a fully staffed Administration and their &#34;greeness&#34; plays a role in their response to the AIG bonus issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;A Tepid but Realistic Defense of the Obama Administration in the AIG Matter&quot; Originally published: &nbsp;19 March 2009 Submitted by: &nbsp;U.S. Common Sense Summary: &nbsp;Examining how the lack of a fully staffed Administration and their &quot;greeness&quot; plays a role in their response to the AIG bonus issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758528</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758528</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/20/video-congress-geithner-knew-about-bonuses-on-march-3rd/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hot Air&lt;/a&gt; has preselected the portion of the March 3rd House Ways and Means Committee hearing where Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) specifically mentions the upcoming payouts of over $162 million in bonuses to AIG execs in comments/questions with Tim Geithner.

It begs the question .. who is minding the store ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/20/video-congress-geithner-knew-about-bonuses-on-march-3rd/" rel="nofollow">Hot Air</a> has preselected the portion of the March 3rd House Ways and Means Committee hearing where Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) specifically mentions the upcoming payouts of over $162 million in bonuses to AIG execs in comments/questions with Tim Geithner.</p>
<p>It begs the question .. who is minding the store ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758523</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758523</guid>
		<description>What really gets me is the fact that these finger pointing idiots are gonna suck up some more of my tax dollars when AIG takes them to court over their unconstitutional tax hike mess.  Most of the demwits knew of this bonus deal going to them but they all get on camera and vomit out so much fake indignation --- God, this makes me ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really gets me is the fact that these finger pointing idiots are gonna suck up some more of my tax dollars when AIG takes them to court over their unconstitutional tax hike mess.  Most of the demwits knew of this bonus deal going to them but they all get on camera and vomit out so much fake indignation &#8212; God, this makes me ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758521</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758521</guid>
		<description>"While Henry M. Paulson, Jr., the current Treasury secretary, has taken a drubbing for the changeable nature of the government's efforts to bolster the financial industry -- somoe of which clearly contradicted each other -- Mr. Geithner has managed, for the most part, to remain unscathed.  He's been wodely praised as a bright, articulat out-of-the-bos thinker who is a BAILOUT EXPERT, to the extent anyone can truely be an expert at fast-changing emergencies.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Geithner was the point person for weeks of sleep-deprived Bailout Weekends.  It was Geithner, not Mr. Paulson, for example, who put together the original rescue plan for the American International Group."

NY Times 11/25/2008

Geithner designed the AIG bailout.  It was his baby.  He also help write TARP along with Patrick Kennedy.  To say that he was not aware that AIG was going to continue to get their bonuses shows that Geithner is either lying, or he is stupid, or both.  The first clue should have been Geithner saying he didn't pay his taxes because he used Turbo Tax.  

And who has Geithner hired to help him and be his waterboy?  None other than Lewis Alexander, chief financial economist for Citigroup, which has also had to have taxpayer bailout dollars.  And Alexander doesn't have to be approved because he is working directly for Geithner.

Add Alexander to the long list of crooks and tax dodgers that are currenly on the new administrations staff.  Just take a look at who is on Obama's Ecomonic Recovery Advisory Board: Penny Pritzer (who still owes the American people millions for her family's failed bank), Andrew Stern, president of the corrupt SEIU and Jeffrey Immelt, who has driven GE into the ground and violated sanctions our nation placed on doing business with Iran.  But then, with GE's new company, Greenhouse Gas Services,that will deal in cap and trade (carbon credit scam), GE, and Immelt, stand to profits handsomely.

Pay to play is alive and well in D.C. and looks like it has gotten a shot of steroids.  

Geithner needs to go.  He brings nothing to the table in a time when the market is looking to the White House to instill confidence.  And what does Obama do while Rome is burning?  He leaves D.C. to go play his fiddle on Jay Leno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While Henry M. Paulson, Jr., the current Treasury secretary, has taken a drubbing for the changeable nature of the government&#8217;s efforts to bolster the financial industry &#8212; somoe of which clearly contradicted each other &#8212; Mr. Geithner has managed, for the most part, to remain unscathed.  He&#8217;s been wodely praised as a bright, articulat out-of-the-bos thinker who is a BAILOUT EXPERT, to the extent anyone can truely be an expert at fast-changing emergencies.</p>
<p>Behind the scenes, Mr. Geithner was the point person for weeks of sleep-deprived Bailout Weekends.  It was Geithner, not Mr. Paulson, for example, who put together the original rescue plan for the American International Group.&#8221;</p>
<p>NY Times 11/25/2008</p>
<p>Geithner designed the AIG bailout.  It was his baby.  He also help write TARP along with Patrick Kennedy.  To say that he was not aware that AIG was going to continue to get their bonuses shows that Geithner is either lying, or he is stupid, or both.  The first clue should have been Geithner saying he didn&#8217;t pay his taxes because he used Turbo Tax.  </p>
<p>And who has Geithner hired to help him and be his waterboy?  None other than Lewis Alexander, chief financial economist for Citigroup, which has also had to have taxpayer bailout dollars.  And Alexander doesn&#8217;t have to be approved because he is working directly for Geithner.</p>
<p>Add Alexander to the long list of crooks and tax dodgers that are currenly on the new administrations staff.  Just take a look at who is on Obama&#8217;s Ecomonic Recovery Advisory Board: Penny Pritzer (who still owes the American people millions for her family&#8217;s failed bank), Andrew Stern, president of the corrupt SEIU and Jeffrey Immelt, who has driven GE into the ground and violated sanctions our nation placed on doing business with Iran.  But then, with GE&#8217;s new company, Greenhouse Gas Services,that will deal in cap and trade (carbon credit scam), GE, and Immelt, stand to profits handsomely.</p>
<p>Pay to play is alive and well in D.C. and looks like it has gotten a shot of steroids.  </p>
<p>Geithner needs to go.  He brings nothing to the table in a time when the market is looking to the White House to instill confidence.  And what does Obama do while Rome is burning?  He leaves D.C. to go play his fiddle on Jay Leno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz Shaw</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758520</guid>
		<description>You are obviously a faux Republican and a hater of America. Or a neocon. Or a lefty. Or... something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are obviously a faux Republican and a hater of America. Or a neocon. Or a lefty. Or&#8230; something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tucson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758519</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758519</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you don’t shut the fuck up about Bush every single time I mention something, you are going to be banned. Bush is not in the White House. End of story. And I did point out the hypocrisy in the Bush administration time and time and time again. For you not to acknowledge that shows your ignorance. Either add something constructive or go away.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm sorry Rick. I'll be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you don’t shut the fuck up about Bush every single time I mention something, you are going to be banned. Bush is not in the White House. End of story. And I did point out the hypocrisy in the Bush administration time and time and time again. For you not to acknowledge that shows your ignorance. Either add something constructive or go away.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry Rick. I&#8217;ll be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Miller</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758518</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758518</guid>
		<description>Before you go any further with some of your misconceptions, perhaps you need to listen to Shep Smith's rant from yesterday on Fox News.  Everyone KNEW that these bonuses were going to be paid and all the outrage is pure posturing on the part of the Congress and the Administration.  A bunch of dishonest and completely cynical liars - the lot of them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you go any further with some of your misconceptions, perhaps you need to listen to Shep Smith&#8217;s rant from yesterday on Fox News.  Everyone KNEW that these bonuses were going to be paid and all the outrage is pure posturing on the part of the Congress and the Administration.  A bunch of dishonest and completely cynical liars - the lot of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveinboca</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758517</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinboca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758517</guid>
		<description>Let's see.  Isn't this administration now on the fourth person to fill the number two spot in Treasury?   I wonder if and how ANYONE will take the job if Geithner continues to sweat blood and mess up the way he seems to be doing.

Who would want to be his backstop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see.  Isn&#8217;t this administration now on the fourth person to fill the number two spot in Treasury?   I wonder if and how ANYONE will take the job if Geithner continues to sweat blood and mess up the way he seems to be doing.</p>
<p>Who would want to be his backstop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/03/19/a-tepid-but-realistic-defense-of-the-obama-administration-in-the-aig-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1758516</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3510#comment-1758516</guid>
		<description>Like you I try to judge by long-term results.  I think Obama is trying to play the long game, which I think is a good idea.  But I'm surprised at how off-balance his message machine has been.  Is Axelrod on vacation?

I don't know with Geithner whether what we're seeing is a clumsy sort of wait-and-see, or whether he's just lost.  It's almost as if with Bernanke and Geithner and the president there's a sneaking feeling that things will sort themselves out over the next months to a year.  

They don't seem as scared as their own rhetoric suggests they should be.  I find this interesting.

I'm just not seeing a clear narrative that makes sense to me, not from any side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you I try to judge by long-term results.  I think Obama is trying to play the long game, which I think is a good idea.  But I&#8217;m surprised at how off-balance his message machine has been.  Is Axelrod on vacation?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know with Geithner whether what we&#8217;re seeing is a clumsy sort of wait-and-see, or whether he&#8217;s just lost.  It&#8217;s almost as if with Bernanke and Geithner and the president there&#8217;s a sneaking feeling that things will sort themselves out over the next months to a year.  </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t seem as scared as their own rhetoric suggests they should be.  I find this interesting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just not seeing a clear narrative that makes sense to me, not from any side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
