<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE CONSERVATIVE CASE FOR GAY MARRIAGE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cdor</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759739</link>
		<dc:creator>cdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759739</guid>
		<description>bs, I clicked on your link three times...amazingly it said the same thing every time I clicked. There is a 19 point spread against gay marriage. That is pretty strong. As far as a Constitutional ammendment against it, well I think it is futile and silly. If Republicans get on that horse, they deserve rebuke.

But here I am knee deep in the obvious again, while you are subtlely exposing the ethereal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bs, I clicked on your link three times&#8230;amazingly it said the same thing every time I clicked. There is a 19 point spread against gay marriage. That is pretty strong. As far as a Constitutional ammendment against it, well I think it is futile and silly. If Republicans get on that horse, they deserve rebuke.</p>
<p>But here I am knee deep in the obvious again, while you are subtlely exposing the ethereal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759726</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759726</guid>
		<description>As you can see, they are all there safe and sound - 4 times worth.

ed.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you can see, they are all there safe and sound - 4 times worth.</p>
<p>ed.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759723</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759723</guid>
		<description>Whew!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759722</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759722</guid>
		<description>http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290" rel="nofollow">http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759721</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759721</guid>
		<description>I find it inexplicable that after posting the pew data on public perception of homosexual marriage three times the comments never get posted.

Incredible.

&lt;em&gt;Incredible alright. They were all captured by the spam filter. As were some others. Not quite sure exactly how it works but if you post more than a certain amount in a certain period of time, it goes to my spam filter for approval or deletion.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;As you can see, they are all there safe and sound - 4 times worth.

ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it inexplicable that after posting the pew data on public perception of homosexual marriage three times the comments never get posted.</p>
<p>Incredible.</p>
<p><em>Incredible alright. They were all captured by the spam filter. As were some others. Not quite sure exactly how it works but if you post more than a certain amount in a certain period of time, it goes to my spam filter for approval or deletion.</em></p>
<p><em>As you can see, they are all there safe and sound - 4 times worth.</p>
<p>ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759720</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759720</guid>
		<description>cdor,
This will be my third and last attempt to link to the PEW data on gay marriage.

oppose legalizing gay marriage 53% to 55%

support civil unions 54%

oppose federal ban on gay marriage 59%

http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdor,<br />
This will be my third and last attempt to link to the PEW data on gay marriage.</p>
<p>oppose legalizing gay marriage 53% to 55%</p>
<p>support civil unions 54%</p>
<p>oppose federal ban on gay marriage 59%</p>
<p><a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290" rel="nofollow">http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759719</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759719</guid>
		<description>Oh, you elusive ghost in the machine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you elusive ghost in the machine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759715</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759715</guid>
		<description>cdor,
I posted the pew research poll that shows the amount of public support for gay marriage and it went into the ether... I'll post it again in abbreviated form. It has some interesting data.

53% to 55% of American people oppose gay marriage.

54% of American people support civil unions.

59% oppose a Federal ban on gay marriage.

http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290

Is this going into the ether too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdor,<br />
I posted the pew research poll that shows the amount of public support for gay marriage and it went into the ether&#8230; I&#8217;ll post it again in abbreviated form. It has some interesting data.</p>
<p>53% to 55% of American people oppose gay marriage.</p>
<p>54% of American people support civil unions.</p>
<p>59% oppose a Federal ban on gay marriage.</p>
<p><a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290" rel="nofollow">http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</a></p>
<p>Is this going into the ether too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsjones</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759714</link>
		<dc:creator>bsjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759714</guid>
		<description>cdor,
I posted the pew research poll that shows the amount of public support for gay marriage and it went into the ether... I'll post it again in abbreviated form. It has some interesting data.

53% to 55% of American people oppose gay marriage.

54% of American people support civil unions.

59% oppose a Federal ban on gay marriage.

http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdor,<br />
I posted the pew research poll that shows the amount of public support for gay marriage and it went into the ether&#8230; I&#8217;ll post it again in abbreviated form. It has some interesting data.</p>
<p>53% to 55% of American people oppose gay marriage.</p>
<p>54% of American people support civil unions.</p>
<p>59% oppose a Federal ban on gay marriage.</p>
<p><a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290" rel="nofollow">http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=290</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdor</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/04/18/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-1759706</link>
		<dc:creator>cdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=3672#comment-1759706</guid>
		<description>I could concur with any supposition you would like to make, bs, but it stiil wouldn't make it fact. The fact is that every state that has either had a pro gay marriage or anti gay marriage popular vote has voted, mostly overwhelmingly, against gay marriage. Unless I am missing something very obvious, in my case, or, oh so subtle, in your case, society is not ready to amend the collective wisdom.

The louder and meaner Perez Hilton screams, the less support he and his compatriots will receive. If judges make it so...we are really going to have a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could concur with any supposition you would like to make, bs, but it stiil wouldn&#8217;t make it fact. The fact is that every state that has either had a pro gay marriage or anti gay marriage popular vote has voted, mostly overwhelmingly, against gay marriage. Unless I am missing something very obvious, in my case, or, oh so subtle, in your case, society is not ready to amend the collective wisdom.</p>
<p>The louder and meaner Perez Hilton screams, the less support he and his compatriots will receive. If judges make it so&#8230;we are really going to have a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
