<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A FEW WORDS ON THE EFFICACY OF CHANGING ONE&#8217;S MIND</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nagarajan Sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762100</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagarajan Sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762100</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;No, I didn’t support the Bush deficits and yes I do support the Obama deficits.

Obama’s spending is to prevent economic catastrophe. Bush’s spending to invade and occpuy a country that was no threat to us.&lt;/i&gt;"

Prevent economic catastrophe ?? Well, i thought that was the TARP funds were meant for - or atleast so i thought until they started using it for bailing out GM, and everything else that they wanted to control.

It is amazing for what passes off as "debate" and how assertive JHarp is in saying the catastrophe would have not been prevented but for stimulus bill to be passed ! What kind of catastrophe is it when the stimulus would not take any meaningful effect as neglible as it is until the middle of 2010 !

The TARP legislation was voted on when Bush was President -this was supposed to be the "catastrophe-saver". Please know basic facts before getting into a debate.

And Bush was criticized AS MUCH for expanding Govt at levels not known since LBJ ( Medicare prescription, No child left behind, no cuts in any spending program) AS FOR invading Iraq - even when you rant against Bush, you dont seem to understand where he did the greater damage.

"&lt;i&gt;Same way everyone in the history of the earth has. By increasing productivity.

Try thinking about it as a student loan.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;"


Increasing productivity by increasing the size and scope of Government - now that is a jaw dropper !&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>No, I didn’t support the Bush deficits and yes I do support the Obama deficits.</p>
<p>Obama’s spending is to prevent economic catastrophe. Bush’s spending to invade and occpuy a country that was no threat to us.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Prevent economic catastrophe ?? Well, i thought that was the TARP funds were meant for - or atleast so i thought until they started using it for bailing out GM, and everything else that they wanted to control.</p>
<p>It is amazing for what passes off as &#8220;debate&#8221; and how assertive JHarp is in saying the catastrophe would have not been prevented but for stimulus bill to be passed ! What kind of catastrophe is it when the stimulus would not take any meaningful effect as neglible as it is until the middle of 2010 !</p>
<p>The TARP legislation was voted on when Bush was President -this was supposed to be the &#8220;catastrophe-saver&#8221;. Please know basic facts before getting into a debate.</p>
<p>And Bush was criticized AS MUCH for expanding Govt at levels not known since LBJ ( Medicare prescription, No child left behind, no cuts in any spending program) AS FOR invading Iraq - even when you rant against Bush, you dont seem to understand where he did the greater damage.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Same way everyone in the history of the earth has. By increasing productivity.</p>
<p>Try thinking about it as a student loan.</i><i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Increasing productivity by increasing the size and scope of Government - now that is a jaw dropper !</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lionheart</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762095</link>
		<dc:creator>lionheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762095</guid>
		<description>jharp, your ignorance is overwhelming.  1) You accuse tea party participants of being Obama haters (without proof, as if your pronouncement of it being true makes it true), when the invective you spew towards Bush makes you a hypocrite of the highest order; 2)You are poorly educated on both economics and current events.  Obama cut taxes already?  Wow!  When did that happen?  And when did overcoming debt occur from increasing productivity?  When you charge up your credit card, does it get paid off because you are more productive at work?  Sorry, it doesn't work that way.  Debt is reduced when it is paid off.  There are many ways to do that (stop spending, increase taxes, or some combo of the two), but simply increasing production is not a cure-all, especially when your idea of a production increase it a bunch of make-work programs that employ bodies, but produce nothing (i.e. government jobs). 3) Conservatives abandoned the party when Bush abandoned conservative principles.  We were harshly critical of Bush's unfettered spending, just as we are now critical of Obama's.

And your silly use of the word "teabagger" highlights your immaturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jharp, your ignorance is overwhelming.  1) You accuse tea party participants of being Obama haters (without proof, as if your pronouncement of it being true makes it true), when the invective you spew towards Bush makes you a hypocrite of the highest order; 2)You are poorly educated on both economics and current events.  Obama cut taxes already?  Wow!  When did that happen?  And when did overcoming debt occur from increasing productivity?  When you charge up your credit card, does it get paid off because you are more productive at work?  Sorry, it doesn&#8217;t work that way.  Debt is reduced when it is paid off.  There are many ways to do that (stop spending, increase taxes, or some combo of the two), but simply increasing production is not a cure-all, especially when your idea of a production increase it a bunch of make-work programs that employ bodies, but produce nothing (i.e. government jobs). 3) Conservatives abandoned the party when Bush abandoned conservative principles.  We were harshly critical of Bush&#8217;s unfettered spending, just as we are now critical of Obama&#8217;s.</p>
<p>And your silly use of the word &#8220;teabagger&#8221; highlights your immaturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jharp</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762074</link>
		<dc:creator>jharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762074</guid>
		<description>Nagarajan Sivakumar Said:
6:37 pm  

"You have to ask yourself this question - did you support the Bush Admn deficits ? If no, then why are you defending Obama’s deficits - just as you accuse the Tea Party movement of being partisan, are’nt you being partisan as well?"

No, I didn't support the Bush deficits and yes I do support the Obama deficits.

Obama's spending is to prevent economic catastrophe. Bush's spending to invade and occpuy a country that was no threat to us.

"Is this the “change” you all “believed” in ? The argument that there was “no other choice” but to ramp up Government spending by monstrous levels shows an intellectual laziness and rank ignorance about fundamental economics."

Yeah. It's pretty much the "change" I expected though I felt the stimulus wasn't enough and I wish he'd fight harder for a single payer health care system.

"How is that “no other choice but the giant boondoggle of a stimulus” working out ?"

Fair. And be patient. little of the stimulus money has been spent and we might need to increase the amount.  You obviously don't grasp the magnitude of the ruin Bush and the GOP have brought down on us.

"Well, dont worry it does not even start to have any positive effects until 2010. But there’s already talk of a second stimulus !"

bingo.

"How do you over come debt ?" 

Same way everyone in the history of the earth has. By increasing productivity.

Try thinking about it as a student loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nagarajan Sivakumar Said:<br />
6:37 pm  </p>
<p>&#8220;You have to ask yourself this question - did you support the Bush Admn deficits ? If no, then why are you defending Obama’s deficits - just as you accuse the Tea Party movement of being partisan, are’nt you being partisan as well?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t support the Bush deficits and yes I do support the Obama deficits.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s spending is to prevent economic catastrophe. Bush&#8217;s spending to invade and occpuy a country that was no threat to us.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is this the “change” you all “believed” in ? The argument that there was “no other choice” but to ramp up Government spending by monstrous levels shows an intellectual laziness and rank ignorance about fundamental economics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah. It&#8217;s pretty much the &#8220;change&#8221; I expected though I felt the stimulus wasn&#8217;t enough and I wish he&#8217;d fight harder for a single payer health care system.</p>
<p>&#8220;How is that “no other choice but the giant boondoggle of a stimulus” working out ?&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair. And be patient. little of the stimulus money has been spent and we might need to increase the amount.  You obviously don&#8217;t grasp the magnitude of the ruin Bush and the GOP have brought down on us.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, dont worry it does not even start to have any positive effects until 2010. But there’s already talk of a second stimulus !&#8221;</p>
<p>bingo.</p>
<p>&#8220;How do you over come debt ?&#8221; </p>
<p>Same way everyone in the history of the earth has. By increasing productivity.</p>
<p>Try thinking about it as a student loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagarajan Sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762070</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagarajan Sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762070</guid>
		<description>It is comical to watch the derision thrown at the  "tea-bagging" crowd. It is even more comical to watch the agony of these people who dont like Rick changing his mind.

Its almost as if no one cared to read the rest of the post as soon as they realized that Rick changed his mind.

I admit that these people should have protested during Bush's administration as well. But that complaint about being partial to Obama's deficit alone misses the point - what Obama has done in the first six months to the deficit is staggering.

You have to ask yourself this question - did you support the Bush Admn deficits ? If no, then why are you defending Obama's deficits - just as you accuse the Tea Party movement of being partisan, are'nt you being partisan as well?

Is this the "change" you all "believed" in ? The argument that there was "no other choice" but to ramp up Government spending by monstrous levels shows an intellectual laziness and rank ignorance about fundamental economics.

How is that "no other choice but the giant boondoggle of a stimulus" working out ? you know that bill that was 1000 pages long and passed in such a hurry so that unemployment is kept under 8 % ?? Well, dont worry it does not even start to have any positive effects until 2010. But there's already talk of a second stimulus !

How do you over come debt ? Why, by piling on more and more debt I suppose !

National Health care "option", Crap and Tax, Trillion dollar stimuluses that favor the various rent seekers of the Democrat party - enjoy it while it lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is comical to watch the derision thrown at the  &#8220;tea-bagging&#8221; crowd. It is even more comical to watch the agony of these people who dont like Rick changing his mind.</p>
<p>Its almost as if no one cared to read the rest of the post as soon as they realized that Rick changed his mind.</p>
<p>I admit that these people should have protested during Bush&#8217;s administration as well. But that complaint about being partial to Obama&#8217;s deficit alone misses the point - what Obama has done in the first six months to the deficit is staggering.</p>
<p>You have to ask yourself this question - did you support the Bush Admn deficits ? If no, then why are you defending Obama&#8217;s deficits - just as you accuse the Tea Party movement of being partisan, are&#8217;nt you being partisan as well?</p>
<p>Is this the &#8220;change&#8221; you all &#8220;believed&#8221; in ? The argument that there was &#8220;no other choice&#8221; but to ramp up Government spending by monstrous levels shows an intellectual laziness and rank ignorance about fundamental economics.</p>
<p>How is that &#8220;no other choice but the giant boondoggle of a stimulus&#8221; working out ? you know that bill that was 1000 pages long and passed in such a hurry so that unemployment is kept under 8 % ?? Well, dont worry it does not even start to have any positive effects until 2010. But there&#8217;s already talk of a second stimulus !</p>
<p>How do you over come debt ? Why, by piling on more and more debt I suppose !</p>
<p>National Health care &#8220;option&#8221;, Crap and Tax, Trillion dollar stimuluses that favor the various rent seekers of the Democrat party - enjoy it while it lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surabaya Stew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762069</link>
		<dc:creator>Surabaya Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762069</guid>
		<description>Please make believe I didn't wrote "skillets"; I of course meant "skill sets"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make believe I didn&#8217;t wrote &#8220;skillets&#8221;; I of course meant &#8220;skill sets&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surabaya Stew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762068</link>
		<dc:creator>Surabaya Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762068</guid>
		<description>Rick, I have to agree with Chuck and Michael about your first opinion being correct, except that the tea parties might serve the useful purpose of bringing out new potential leaders of the Conservative movement. All the rallies and protests that make up the tea parties aren't so much about the cause, they're about developing skillets and enthusiasm that hopefully will take over the GOP from the loonies that now control it. Obama and the Democrats need an honest opposition, not an insane one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, I have to agree with Chuck and Michael about your first opinion being correct, except that the tea parties might serve the useful purpose of bringing out new potential leaders of the Conservative movement. All the rallies and protests that make up the tea parties aren&#8217;t so much about the cause, they&#8217;re about developing skillets and enthusiasm that hopefully will take over the GOP from the loonies that now control it. Obama and the Democrats need an honest opposition, not an insane one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762067</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762067</guid>
		<description>You were right the first time Rick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were right the first time Rick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tucson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762062</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tucson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762062</guid>
		<description>jharp said: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;The teabaggers need to quit whining about losing an election and just once try to offer constructive ideas.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Eight years of Republican governance shed light on two basic rules: 

1) Never admit you were wrong about anything.

2) If you change your mind in light of new information you are a gigantic sniveling pussy intellectual who hates America.

What you're suggesting is that Tea Party people help fix the problems that their programs and policies caused. Unfortunately though, this would violate rules 1 and 2 above and is therefore impossible. 

This is unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jharp said: </p>
<blockquote><p>The teabaggers need to quit whining about losing an election and just once try to offer constructive ideas.</p></blockquote>
<p>Eight years of Republican governance shed light on two basic rules: </p>
<p>1) Never admit you were wrong about anything.</p>
<p>2) If you change your mind in light of new information you are a gigantic sniveling pussy intellectual who hates America.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re suggesting is that Tea Party people help fix the problems that their programs and policies caused. Unfortunately though, this would violate rules 1 and 2 above and is therefore impossible. </p>
<p>This is unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jharp</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762059</link>
		<dc:creator>jharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762059</guid>
		<description>So exactly what are the tea parties about.

Obama cut taxes so the TEA, Taxed Enough Already, is nonsense.

Doubling of the deficit? Where were the teabaggers when George Bush did the same damn thing in a period of growth. Obama's spending is a reaction to the worst economy since the depression. We had and have no choice.

You were right in your first position, Rick. 

The teabaggers are a joke.

They are nothing more than "I hate Obama" rallies. The teabaggers need to quit whining about losing an election and just once try to offer constructive ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So exactly what are the tea parties about.</p>
<p>Obama cut taxes so the TEA, Taxed Enough Already, is nonsense.</p>
<p>Doubling of the deficit? Where were the teabaggers when George Bush did the same damn thing in a period of growth. Obama&#8217;s spending is a reaction to the worst economy since the depression. We had and have no choice.</p>
<p>You were right in your first position, Rick. </p>
<p>The teabaggers are a joke.</p>
<p>They are nothing more than &#8220;I hate Obama&#8221; rallies. The teabaggers need to quit whining about losing an election and just once try to offer constructive ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funny man</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/07/06/a-few-words-on-the-efficacy-of-changing-ones-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-1762055</link>
		<dc:creator>funny man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4162#comment-1762055</guid>
		<description>What does changing one's mind really mean? Let's stick with the old Greeks for a second 'I know that I don't know'. We know far too little to really understand the world but realizing this 'should' make us a little humble. Case in point perhaps Karl Marx, his analysis in "Das Kapital" was actually in part brilliant. However, he thought he could explain everything by his deterministic dialectic (not the only one at the time) and ultimately his philosophy put into reality failed. So how could it be that quite a number of brilliant minds e.g. part of the Western Left kept defending a failed system? I guess there is just one answer to this, not wanting to be a traitor, romanticism, belief in ones superior intellect come to mind. However, these forces on our minds are by no means restricted to one political philosophy, they are universal.
I've had many changes of mind for whatever reason. I try not to be so full of poop to believe all those changes were due to unselfish noble and rational reasons. Anyway, before I get to carried away, Congrats Rick for the ability to sometimes see things differently after time. A philosophy, again example Marx, without the ability for self criticism is doomed to fail. And we don't want that now, do we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does changing one&#8217;s mind really mean? Let&#8217;s stick with the old Greeks for a second &#8216;I know that I don&#8217;t know&#8217;. We know far too little to really understand the world but realizing this &#8217;should&#8217; make us a little humble. Case in point perhaps Karl Marx, his analysis in &#8220;Das Kapital&#8221; was actually in part brilliant. However, he thought he could explain everything by his deterministic dialectic (not the only one at the time) and ultimately his philosophy put into reality failed. So how could it be that quite a number of brilliant minds e.g. part of the Western Left kept defending a failed system? I guess there is just one answer to this, not wanting to be a traitor, romanticism, belief in ones superior intellect come to mind. However, these forces on our minds are by no means restricted to one political philosophy, they are universal.<br />
I&#8217;ve had many changes of mind for whatever reason. I try not to be so full of poop to believe all those changes were due to unselfish noble and rational reasons. Anyway, before I get to carried away, Congrats Rick for the ability to sometimes see things differently after time. A philosophy, again example Marx, without the ability for self criticism is doomed to fail. And we don&#8217;t want that now, do we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
