<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHAT ABOUT THAT MEMO SHOWING KENNEDY WORKING AGAINST AMERICAN INTERESTS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lionheart</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763827</link>
		<dc:creator>lionheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763827</guid>
		<description>Michael Reynolds said:&lt;blockquote&gt;But you’re right, it’s time for me to move on.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Good riddance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Reynolds said:<br />
<blockquote>But you’re right, it’s time for me to move on.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good riddance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763819</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763819</guid>
		<description>That is 8 elections voting republican though...You're on a roll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is 8 elections voting republican though&#8230;You&#8217;re on a roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763817</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763817</guid>
		<description>Rick said:

"Voted for Carter in 1976. Almost voted for McGovern but in the end, didn’t vote for president in 72. Would have voted for Clinton in 92 if he had been honest."

I stand corrected Rick...I do admit when I'm wrong...You are NOT a partisan...I apologize for implying that you were..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Voted for Carter in 1976. Almost voted for McGovern but in the end, didn’t vote for president in 72. Would have voted for Clinton in 92 if he had been honest.&#8221;</p>
<p>I stand corrected Rick&#8230;I do admit when I&#8217;m wrong&#8230;You are NOT a partisan&#8230;I apologize for implying that you were..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763815</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763815</guid>
		<description>I always thought this was a KGB dis-information set up. He probably did make some sort of overture to them but I would suspect it was rather benign. First, I don't believe the Soviet Union would have ever trusted a Kennedy. Second, they felt sure that Kennedy was an extremely viable Presidential candidate. To them, Chappaquiddick meant nothing.

So why would they do this? For the pure embarrassment factor if Kennedy ever became President. They could hamstring him politically anytime they wanted. I think this was nothing more that the KGB setting up a little insurance just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought this was a KGB dis-information set up. He probably did make some sort of overture to them but I would suspect it was rather benign. First, I don&#8217;t believe the Soviet Union would have ever trusted a Kennedy. Second, they felt sure that Kennedy was an extremely viable Presidential candidate. To them, Chappaquiddick meant nothing.</p>
<p>So why would they do this? For the pure embarrassment factor if Kennedy ever became President. They could hamstring him politically anytime they wanted. I think this was nothing more that the KGB setting up a little insurance just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763811</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763811</guid>
		<description>sota said:

"At least we agree on the term “partisan”. Labeling Rick a partisan is laughable, at best. That’s why I ask. He can obviously speak for himself (or his blog postings can in his absence), but if you’ve spent any time reading or listening to him you’d understand why that’s the case.

Nagarajan has a lot more patience than I do, so I won’t bother with the details. Suffice it to say, Rick defends his principles vehemently, but he does not defend Republicans blindly (which, I assume, is your implication with the label). I think even his critics here would agree that he’s conservative before Republican."

Sota..

Try asking Rick who the last Democrat he voted for in a presidential election was...that will confirm whether or not he has a "firm adherence or allegiance to a political party."

I voted for Reagan...and I sat it out in 04' because I couldn't bear to pull the lever for Kerry, even if it was a vote against Bush..

&lt;em&gt;Voted for Carter in 1976. Almost voted for McGovern but in the end, didn't vote for president in 72. Would have voted for Clinton in 92 if he had been honest.

ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sota said:</p>
<p>&#8220;At least we agree on the term “partisan”. Labeling Rick a partisan is laughable, at best. That’s why I ask. He can obviously speak for himself (or his blog postings can in his absence), but if you’ve spent any time reading or listening to him you’d understand why that’s the case.</p>
<p>Nagarajan has a lot more patience than I do, so I won’t bother with the details. Suffice it to say, Rick defends his principles vehemently, but he does not defend Republicans blindly (which, I assume, is your implication with the label). I think even his critics here would agree that he’s conservative before Republican.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sota..</p>
<p>Try asking Rick who the last Democrat he voted for in a presidential election was&#8230;that will confirm whether or not he has a &#8220;firm adherence or allegiance to a political party.&#8221;</p>
<p>I voted for Reagan&#8230;and I sat it out in 04&#8242; because I couldn&#8217;t bear to pull the lever for Kerry, even if it was a vote against Bush..</p>
<p><em>Voted for Carter in 1976. Almost voted for McGovern but in the end, didn&#8217;t vote for president in 72. Would have voted for Clinton in 92 if he had been honest.</p>
<p>ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763810</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763810</guid>
		<description>I don't hate you guys, I don't even know you..

Hate is a very negative state to be in...I try to avoid it...I do hate the people who plot to kill American citizens though...they are worthy of my hate..

I may think that you guys are misguided, misinformed, and generally mystified...Not to mention occasionally rude and lacking a sense of humor...but you are Americans, and I do not consider you the "enemy"...Nor do I fear your tactics or rhetoric...Politics is cyclical, you'll get another chance at power...one day.

and I don't believe I ever said I was leaving...But if Rick asked me to go, I'd go...No skin off my back...He pays for the bandwidth..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hate you guys, I don&#8217;t even know you..</p>
<p>Hate is a very negative state to be in&#8230;I try to avoid it&#8230;I do hate the people who plot to kill American citizens though&#8230;they are worthy of my hate..</p>
<p>I may think that you guys are misguided, misinformed, and generally mystified&#8230;Not to mention occasionally rude and lacking a sense of humor&#8230;but you are Americans, and I do not consider you the &#8220;enemy&#8221;&#8230;Nor do I fear your tactics or rhetoric&#8230;Politics is cyclical, you&#8217;ll get another chance at power&#8230;one day.</p>
<p>and I don&#8217;t believe I ever said I was leaving&#8230;But if Rick asked me to go, I&#8217;d go&#8230;No skin off my back&#8230;He pays for the bandwidth..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagarajan Sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763798</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagarajan Sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763798</guid>
		<description>Moltenorb,
                  Why are you still at this site ? I thought you hated us. Please blather at the non partisan non biased blog that truly exists in the blogosphere..

And here i was, ready to take a liberal at his word that he was leaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moltenorb,<br />
                  Why are you still at this site ? I thought you hated us. Please blather at the non partisan non biased blog that truly exists in the blogosphere..</p>
<p>And here i was, ready to take a liberal at his word that he was leaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763797</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763797</guid>
		<description>To coin a term...you're Rickpublicans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To coin a term&#8230;you&#8217;re Rickpublicans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moltenorb</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763796</link>
		<dc:creator>Moltenorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763796</guid>
		<description>Nagarajan and sota,

You're both partisan for Rick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nagarajan and sota,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re both partisan for Rick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sota</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/08/29/what-about-that-memo-showing-kennedy-working-against-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-1763794</link>
		<dc:creator>sota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4465#comment-1763794</guid>
		<description>"Are you kidding me?

Having a firm adherence or allegiance to a political party."

Not kidding at all. At least we agree on the term "partisan". Labeling Rick a partisan is laughable, at best. That's why I ask. He can obviously speak for himself (or his blog postings can in his absence), but if you've spent any time reading or listening to him you'd understand why that's the case.

Nagarajan has a lot more patience than I do, so I won't bother with the details. Suffice it to say, Rick defends his principles vehemently, but he does not defend Republicans blindly (which, I assume, is your implication with the label). I think even his critics here would agree that he's conservative before Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you kidding me?</p>
<p>Having a firm adherence or allegiance to a political party.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not kidding at all. At least we agree on the term &#8220;partisan&#8221;. Labeling Rick a partisan is laughable, at best. That&#8217;s why I ask. He can obviously speak for himself (or his blog postings can in his absence), but if you&#8217;ve spent any time reading or listening to him you&#8217;d understand why that&#8217;s the case.</p>
<p>Nagarajan has a lot more patience than I do, so I won&#8217;t bother with the details. Suffice it to say, Rick defends his principles vehemently, but he does not defend Republicans blindly (which, I assume, is your implication with the label). I think even his critics here would agree that he&#8217;s conservative before Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
