<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;SILENCE EQUALS ASSENT:&#8217; WHY POINTING OUT CONSERVATIVE LUNACY MUST BE DONE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: busboy33</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764966</link>
		<dc:creator>busboy33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764966</guid>
		<description>@FreedomsTruth (one last time):

"I don’t fall for the ‘guilt-by-association’ aka McCarthyism claims, that because the right has a fringe therefore the whole right is wrong. The left has its fringe, the Castro/Chavez-loving crowd, the ‘kill all SUVs’ eco-extremists, the anti-population nuts, the impeach Bush BDS folks, the Socialist Democrats. If the other shoe fits, then the entire Democrat party is a bunch of communists … which gets us back to the kinds of hyperbole you are (rightly) objecting to. " (comment #3)


"That is no different on the left. You’ve just describe the proggo-sphere in reverse." (comment #13)

"Some on the right are reading Alinsky and taking the tactics of the left seriously." (comment #30)

"It’s a wonderful label, and us classical Jeffersonian liberals are ticked off that the leftists and socialists stole it from the real classical liberals way back when. (New Deal era?) Then again, leftists and socialists are natural thieves, hijacking labels left and right." (comment #31)

I won't bother with the rest.  I have no doubt that what I'm trying to point out is completely escaping you, but perhaps some other readers of this thred might notice what I noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FreedomsTruth (one last time):</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t fall for the ‘guilt-by-association’ aka McCarthyism claims, that because the right has a fringe therefore the whole right is wrong. The left has its fringe, the Castro/Chavez-loving crowd, the ‘kill all SUVs’ eco-extremists, the anti-population nuts, the impeach Bush BDS folks, the Socialist Democrats. If the other shoe fits, then the entire Democrat party is a bunch of communists … which gets us back to the kinds of hyperbole you are (rightly) objecting to. &#8221; (comment #3)</p>
<p>&#8220;That is no different on the left. You’ve just describe the proggo-sphere in reverse.&#8221; (comment #13)</p>
<p>&#8220;Some on the right are reading Alinsky and taking the tactics of the left seriously.&#8221; (comment #30)</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s a wonderful label, and us classical Jeffersonian liberals are ticked off that the leftists and socialists stole it from the real classical liberals way back when. (New Deal era?) Then again, leftists and socialists are natural thieves, hijacking labels left and right.&#8221; (comment #31)</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t bother with the rest.  I have no doubt that what I&#8217;m trying to point out is completely escaping you, but perhaps some other readers of this thred might notice what I noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Right Wing Nut House » ‘SILENCE EQUALS ASSENT:’ WHY POINTING OUT CONSERVATIVE LUNACY MUST BE DONE -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764932</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Right Wing Nut House » ‘SILENCE EQUALS ASSENT:’ WHY POINTING OUT CONSERVATIVE LUNACY MUST BE DONE -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764932</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jules Morrow. Jules Morrow said: An intelligent conservative takes on the OBAMA=HITLER crowd http://bit.ly/19HwBc Sad how much he stands out from the crowd (via @ChasLicc) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jules Morrow. Jules Morrow said: An intelligent conservative takes on the OBAMA=HITLER crowd <a href="http://bit.ly/19HwBc" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/19HwBc</a> Sad how much he stands out from the crowd (via @ChasLicc) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764922</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764922</guid>
		<description>@Freedom Truth, National Socialism was NOT like Communism in that the underlying ideology was very different.  I'm well aware of what NSDAP stood for as I speak fluent German.  Nazism was a far-right movement--Communism a far left movement.  Also, as was pointed out by busboy (#67), socialism is yet another thing.  People call Obama a socialist--sadly, he's not...definitely not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Freedom Truth, National Socialism was NOT like Communism in that the underlying ideology was very different.  I&#8217;m well aware of what NSDAP stood for as I speak fluent German.  Nazism was a far-right movement&#8211;Communism a far left movement.  Also, as was pointed out by busboy (#67), socialism is yet another thing.  People call Obama a socialist&#8211;sadly, he&#8217;s not&#8230;definitely not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liza</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764915</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764915</guid>
		<description>It's reassuring to see there is some intelligence left in your country.  The seemingly mainstream Obama bashings and illogical comparissons to communism and nazism have reached us all the way down in Australia, completely baffling us.  It's so refreshing to see someone expressing an opinion rationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s reassuring to see there is some intelligence left in your country.  The seemingly mainstream Obama bashings and illogical comparissons to communism and nazism have reached us all the way down in Australia, completely baffling us.  It&#8217;s so refreshing to see someone expressing an opinion rationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busboy33</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764905</link>
		<dc:creator>busboy33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764905</guid>
		<description>FreedomTruths#62:

"My point has been that the Left has successfully used certain tactics in the past 8 years and prior, and that some on the right are picking up on those tactics. 

You are free to only condemn right-wingers for frothing in manners that ape what left-wingers were doing in the previous Bush administration if that is your wish."


So the bad behavior from the Left is because they are the originators of the bad bad behavior.  The bad behavior of the Right is aping the bad behavior of the Left -- so the behavior from the Right has its genesis in the Left.

Left bad = Left bad.

Right bad = Left bad.

No, I think I read you right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FreedomTruths#62:</p>
<p>&#8220;My point has been that the Left has successfully used certain tactics in the past 8 years and prior, and that some on the right are picking up on those tactics. </p>
<p>You are free to only condemn right-wingers for frothing in manners that ape what left-wingers were doing in the previous Bush administration if that is your wish.&#8221;</p>
<p>So the bad behavior from the Left is because they are the originators of the bad bad behavior.  The bad behavior of the Right is aping the bad behavior of the Left &#8212; so the behavior from the Right has its genesis in the Left.</p>
<p>Left bad = Left bad.</p>
<p>Right bad = Left bad.</p>
<p>No, I think I read you right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busboy33</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764899</link>
		<dc:creator>busboy33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764899</guid>
		<description>@FreedomsTruth:

Communism is not the same thing a Socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FreedomsTruth:</p>
<p>Communism is not the same thing a Socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedoms Truth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764896</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedoms Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764896</guid>
		<description>"Fascism and Communism are mutally exclusive, as they occupy opposite ends of the political spectrum."
That is completely wrong. Fascism=National Socialism and Communism=international socialism. NAZI stood for National Socialist Workers Party. 
Under Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Mao these forms of govt in operation were twins in the totalitarian firmament.
Both fascism and commnism Featured: one-party rule, control of the media, control of the economy via central planning, youth movements centered around the party, Party operatives in military and govt positions to maintain control, and sending to camps those they disfavored (dissidents, troublemakers, wrong ethnic groups). 

" It’s always been very easy to fool people who refuse to educate themselves."
This is ironically true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fascism and Communism are mutally exclusive, as they occupy opposite ends of the political spectrum.&#8221;<br />
That is completely wrong. Fascism=National Socialism and Communism=international socialism. NAZI stood for National Socialist Workers Party.<br />
Under Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Mao these forms of govt in operation were twins in the totalitarian firmament.<br />
Both fascism and commnism Featured: one-party rule, control of the media, control of the economy via central planning, youth movements centered around the party, Party operatives in military and govt positions to maintain control, and sending to camps those they disfavored (dissidents, troublemakers, wrong ethnic groups). </p>
<p>&#8221; It’s always been very easy to fool people who refuse to educate themselves.&#8221;<br />
This is ironically true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedoms Truth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764895</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedoms Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764895</guid>
		<description>"Republicans: keep seceeding your power to the religious fundamentalists and nuts like Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh. Keep talking about ACORN, Ayers and Wright, and Obamacare."

Katie: So Republicans talking about ACORN - an organization which these 'nuts' have exposed as enablers of illegal activities - makes you support Democrats more?

and Obamacare? So a Republican or conservative pointing out all the taxes, controls, mandates, lack of oversight, lack of CBO scoring, and complete political powermongering to shove this bad bill through the Congress, makes you jump on the bandwagon to support it?

Your comment makes no sense at all. Totally illogical.

Methinks some Obama voters are trying to ex post rationalize their mistaken votes by shutting out criticism of the President. Keep the fingers in your ears, O-philes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Republicans: keep seceeding your power to the religious fundamentalists and nuts like Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh. Keep talking about ACORN, Ayers and Wright, and Obamacare.&#8221;</p>
<p>Katie: So Republicans talking about ACORN - an organization which these &#8216;nuts&#8217; have exposed as enablers of illegal activities - makes you support Democrats more?</p>
<p>and Obamacare? So a Republican or conservative pointing out all the taxes, controls, mandates, lack of oversight, lack of CBO scoring, and complete political powermongering to shove this bad bill through the Congress, makes you jump on the bandwagon to support it?</p>
<p>Your comment makes no sense at all. Totally illogical.</p>
<p>Methinks some Obama voters are trying to ex post rationalize their mistaken votes by shutting out criticism of the President. Keep the fingers in your ears, O-philes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedoms Truth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764894</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedoms Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764894</guid>
		<description>"The only one that comes immediately to mind was the push for Hillarycare, which was really alarming. Bumbles and Slick were rather terrible Presidents in my view, but they did not set off ist alarms and signs the way or to the same extent Obama has done."

Dittos on this, 100%.

There is a clear ideological bent to Obama and his administration that was not in evidence in Clinton's triangulating administration, even though CLinton clearly tacked to the left on some things and put liberals in courts, etc.

It was clear the Democrats THEMSELVES picked up on this, as Obama got Kennedy endorsements and picked up the more progressive/left-wing votes, and Hillary the more 'traditional Democrat' votes when the primary became a 1on1 fight.

For Democrats to pretend otherwise NOW - AFTER the LBJ/FDR 'things won't be the same again' claims - is to be too cute by half. They HOPED for Obama to be a major shift to the left for the whole country. 

Now, after he has ALREADY proposed the largest power grabs in American history, they are going to pretend he's not a leftist but a moderate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only one that comes immediately to mind was the push for Hillarycare, which was really alarming. Bumbles and Slick were rather terrible Presidents in my view, but they did not set off ist alarms and signs the way or to the same extent Obama has done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dittos on this, 100%.</p>
<p>There is a clear ideological bent to Obama and his administration that was not in evidence in Clinton&#8217;s triangulating administration, even though CLinton clearly tacked to the left on some things and put liberals in courts, etc.</p>
<p>It was clear the Democrats THEMSELVES picked up on this, as Obama got Kennedy endorsements and picked up the more progressive/left-wing votes, and Hillary the more &#8216;traditional Democrat&#8217; votes when the primary became a 1on1 fight.</p>
<p>For Democrats to pretend otherwise NOW - AFTER the LBJ/FDR &#8216;things won&#8217;t be the same again&#8217; claims - is to be too cute by half. They HOPED for Obama to be a major shift to the left for the whole country. </p>
<p>Now, after he has ALREADY proposed the largest power grabs in American history, they are going to pretend he&#8217;s not a leftist but a moderate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedoms Truth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/09/29/silence-equals-assent-why-pointing-out-conservative-lunacy-must-be-done/comment-page-2/#comment-1764893</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedoms Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4686#comment-1764893</guid>
		<description>"The Democrats are closer to old style Goldwater or Eisenhower Republicans. "

Someone please clue me in on when the Goldwater or Eisenhower Republicans ever:
- Appointed a NAMBLA-supporting radical in charge of 'safe schools'
- Put a guy in favor of race-based quotas in charge of the DOJ
- Decided to mandate/tax everyone in America who chose not to buy health insurance and advocated a huge expansion in the Govt reach into healthcare sectore
- Proposed massive tax increases and regulatory schemes on energy
- passed a Federal budget that swallowed more than a quarter of GDP and adds $9 trillion in deficits, doubling our debt load 
- pushed takeovers of car companies and shovelled billions in tax dollars out the door with a giveaway for old cars
- Pushed for bills to be passed hurredly without even reading them
- Called those who disputed portions of his agenda proposals 'liars' for daring to point out troubling provisions in them
- Called critics of the President 'racist'

Democrats in DC today are a clown show of leftists, liberal elitist social engineers, Chicago Boy corrupt operators, and party hacks with knee-jerk animus to 'flyover' conservative America. Any resemblance to the reasonableness of either party of 40 years ago is a figment of hope over change.

The Republican right has lose that veneer of politesse and noblesse oblige that made them nice losers to the Democrats. If that's a vice, it's a minor one compared to the bullying of the Democrats. And, as Goldwater said "extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice". He'd be supporting the Tea Party crowd if he was around to witness it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Democrats are closer to old style Goldwater or Eisenhower Republicans. &#8221;</p>
<p>Someone please clue me in on when the Goldwater or Eisenhower Republicans ever:<br />
- Appointed a NAMBLA-supporting radical in charge of &#8217;safe schools&#8217;<br />
- Put a guy in favor of race-based quotas in charge of the DOJ<br />
- Decided to mandate/tax everyone in America who chose not to buy health insurance and advocated a huge expansion in the Govt reach into healthcare sectore<br />
- Proposed massive tax increases and regulatory schemes on energy<br />
- passed a Federal budget that swallowed more than a quarter of GDP and adds $9 trillion in deficits, doubling our debt load<br />
- pushed takeovers of car companies and shovelled billions in tax dollars out the door with a giveaway for old cars<br />
- Pushed for bills to be passed hurredly without even reading them<br />
- Called those who disputed portions of his agenda proposals &#8216;liars&#8217; for daring to point out troubling provisions in them<br />
- Called critics of the President &#8216;racist&#8217;</p>
<p>Democrats in DC today are a clown show of leftists, liberal elitist social engineers, Chicago Boy corrupt operators, and party hacks with knee-jerk animus to &#8216;flyover&#8217; conservative America. Any resemblance to the reasonableness of either party of 40 years ago is a figment of hope over change.</p>
<p>The Republican right has lose that veneer of politesse and noblesse oblige that made them nice losers to the Democrats. If that&#8217;s a vice, it&#8217;s a minor one compared to the bullying of the Democrats. And, as Goldwater said &#8220;extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice&#8221;. He&#8217;d be supporting the Tea Party crowd if he was around to witness it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
