<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEANINGLESS PROGRESS WITH IRAN HAILED AS &#8216;TRIUMPH OF DIPLOMACY&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1764963</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4706#comment-1764963</guid>
		<description>My only comment is that I pray for the success of diplomacy with Iran.  I don't want America to be going to war with any other nations.  We go in, we blow their stuff up, destroy their government... and then we stay there and build the country back up and build them a new government... and then we spend all our money and allow our soldiers to die trying to build up other nations.  So I wish for the success of diplomacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only comment is that I pray for the success of diplomacy with Iran.  I don&#8217;t want America to be going to war with any other nations.  We go in, we blow their stuff up, destroy their government&#8230; and then we stay there and build the country back up and build them a new government&#8230; and then we spend all our money and allow our soldiers to die trying to build up other nations.  So I wish for the success of diplomacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1764936</link>
		<dc:creator>Polimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4706#comment-1764936</guid>
		<description>Rick,
While I share concerns about Iran's ultimate goals, your argument that "this proves nothing' falls a bit short.

Essentially, you seem to be saying that no matter what Iran might do or say, we still won't know what else they might be hiding.  Very reminiscent of "you can't prove a negative" -- and ultimately an impossible threshold to overcome.

&lt;em&gt;You are basically correct. But reading Jeffrey Lewis at Arms Control Wonk, it seems there is a body of opinion over there that the Qom facility is probably just one in a string of unknown facilties. US intel evidently believes this as well as is searching very hard for more. For instance, the wonks point out that a secret enrichment facility wouldn't be very useful unless there was a secret processing plant for the Uranium hex. And secret mining operations to supply the processing plant.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Until Iran gets a smidgen of credibility, nothing they say can be realistically believed.

ed.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,<br />
While I share concerns about Iran&#8217;s ultimate goals, your argument that &#8220;this proves nothing&#8217; falls a bit short.</p>
<p>Essentially, you seem to be saying that no matter what Iran might do or say, we still won&#8217;t know what else they might be hiding.  Very reminiscent of &#8220;you can&#8217;t prove a negative&#8221; &#8212; and ultimately an impossible threshold to overcome.</p>
<p><em>You are basically correct. But reading Jeffrey Lewis at Arms Control Wonk, it seems there is a body of opinion over there that the Qom facility is probably just one in a string of unknown facilties. US intel evidently believes this as well as is searching very hard for more. For instance, the wonks point out that a secret enrichment facility wouldn&#8217;t be very useful unless there was a secret processing plant for the Uranium hex. And secret mining operations to supply the processing plant.</em></p>
<p><em>Until Iran gets a smidgen of credibility, nothing they say can be realistically believed.</p>
<p>ed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagarajan Sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1764914</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagarajan Sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4706#comment-1764914</guid>
		<description>When Iran finally gets its nukes, all this would look useless.

For a country that supposedly wants "peaceful" use of nuclear energy, the Iranians do seem to be taking the hard road... why the secrecy? after all that was only for "peaceful" purposes right ?

Economic sanctions wont do a damned thing. Iran basically played its cards to perfection. Now the Israelis have even lesser room than before to pre-emptively attack their facilities..

Who knows ? Obama may very well not mind a nuclear armed Iran to force Israel into even more concessions.

Well played Dinnerjacket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Iran finally gets its nukes, all this would look useless.</p>
<p>For a country that supposedly wants &#8220;peaceful&#8221; use of nuclear energy, the Iranians do seem to be taking the hard road&#8230; why the secrecy? after all that was only for &#8220;peaceful&#8221; purposes right ?</p>
<p>Economic sanctions wont do a damned thing. Iran basically played its cards to perfection. Now the Israelis have even lesser room than before to pre-emptively attack their facilities..</p>
<p>Who knows ? Obama may very well not mind a nuclear armed Iran to force Israel into even more concessions.</p>
<p>Well played Dinnerjacket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard bottoms</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2009/10/02/meaningless-progress-with-iran-hailed-as-triumph-of-diplomacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1764885</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard bottoms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=4706#comment-1764885</guid>
		<description>Barring an invasion and complete takeover of Iran how exactly are we to find these unknown sites?

Reducing Iran's acknowledge stockpile of uranium and inspections now is a great first step and certainly something we have neither the manpower, material, or funds on hand to achieve by force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barring an invasion and complete takeover of Iran how exactly are we to find these unknown sites?</p>
<p>Reducing Iran&#8217;s acknowledge stockpile of uranium and inspections now is a great first step and certainly something we have neither the manpower, material, or funds on hand to achieve by force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
