Comments on: SARAH PALIN AS THE PIVOT FOR ‘NEW’ GOP

By: funny man

funny man — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:50:14 +0000

The bald head Schmidt is among the double agent being highly paid by DNC operatives.

Great. LOL!!!!

By: Richard bottoms

Richard bottoms — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:07:41 +0000

There’s only one thing about the Republicans that gets me down: Rupert Murdoch owns Buffy, The Simpsons, X-Men, and Avatar.

D’Oh.

By: Tom Lamb

Tom Lamb — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:15:56 +0000

When asked about the move, Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said: “We support those who advance our core beliefs and lead by principle.”

And how does “Visorgate” fit in?

She endorses McCain…. ANWR, Gitmo, waterboarding, cap and trade all things that are not her core beliefs but she supports McCain anyways.

That statement Meg made is typical Stapleton blunder.

Your analysis is off track… The people advising her haven’t a clue what may lay ahead in an Arizona Senate race…

Makes you wonder who SarahPac has endorsed?

Palin needs a new coat of fresh paint and an oil change to get her bus running right.

By: funny man

funny man — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:14:48 +0000

Manning:
you have to differentiate between bacterial and mammalian strategies in evolution. So bacteria have the tendency to shrink their genome constantly. Everything they don’t need they kick out. That is why bacteria that live in a symbiotic environment have much smaller genomes than their free living relatives. Why? Because their environment is much more stable e.g. they don’t have to worry about a sudden heat wave or a sudden increase in metal concentration because acid mine drainage suddenly enters their stream. So if they don’t have those protective genes they are dead (so their streamlining didn’t work, smile)
Ok, regarding the so called junk sequence. Very interesting, unresolved topic. So when genomes of many higher organisms were sequenced people noticed vast areas of DNA that didn’t seem to have any purpose, hence the term. However, as we slowly understand how differentiation and regulation work in those organisms some people (including me) believe this is a way to allow the genome to be more flexible to show plasticity. It’s a bit long now to ponder but that is my short answer.

Ok, conscience. Great topic. So when you look at the genome sequence, apes and humans are very, very close. So it can’t be vast amounts of different genes etc but rather it has to be regulation, different ability to better connect the neurons in our brain. Trust me, with the genomes available and the ability to look at differential regulation, this will be an exiting time in the next years.

By: Raymond

Raymond — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:00:58 +0000

All GOP DC insiders and RINO pundits main intention is to trash out Palin. The DNC dirty political strategists has successfully infiltrated the GOP core even during the time of 2012 POTUS election. The bald head Schmidt is among the double agent being highly paid by DNC operatives. The DNC desires to have MITT as the GOP nominee on 2012 to ensure Obama’s reelection. With Palin rising as shown on all current polls, it is clearly to say that ONLY PALIN can be able to defeat Obama on 2012. Palin does not need the GOP. She can run 2012 POTUS as an independent conservative and I am pretty sure that she will get the majority of the American voters who are tired and fed up of corruption in washington. I am feeling now the outrage and American people are tired already of corrupted politics. Thing and times have changed. American people now wants true reform and true change.

Some who comment here are dumb. Some are crazy.

With you, we get a twofer.

ed.

By: Richard bottoms

Richard bottoms — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:24:22 +0000

Actually, Richard, losing 2010 seems very important to the Democrats. Then again, you have reminded people why they threw you on the ash heap of history a couple of decades ago so your four-year exodus from the wilderness is about to end.

Big talk from a political party that owned the world nine years ago who went on to get their butts roundly kicked two elections in a row.

No matter what happens in 2010 you can’t outrun demographics and Hispanics despise the GOP almost as much as black folks do.

Foaming at the mouth racist teabagger will be unrestrained in their anger at the brown and black people they blame for all their troubles.

The insult fest will be so nauseating that that precious 2% will once again see your party for what it always was and still is no matter what face you put on it.

The fact remains is if unemployment is below 10% by next year’s election you’ll gain squat.

And I can tell you now after a year of nothing my phone is ringing off the hook like it’s 1997 again. If tech in California is any indication, spring will be on fire.

By: obamathered

obamathered — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:32:53 +0000

Actually, Richard, losing 2010 seems very important to the Democrats. Then again, you have reminded people why they threw you on the ash heap of history a couple of decades ago so your four-year exodus from the wilderness is about to end.

By: mannning

mannning — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:44:14 +0000

funnyman:

Very interesting comment! Gene transfer via a number of mechanisms, and it directly implicates the comparative similarity of genomes of many animals. How does this relate to the so-called trash DNA sequences, that some believe are not trash at all?

I am still puzzled by the evolution of human consciousness, brain function, and mind, but then, so is everyone. From whence came the spark that clearly separates man from all other animals? It would seem that still other evolutionary mechanisms are at work that we have little knowledge of or scientific explanation for, not yet, anyway. Definitely unsettling!

By: Richard bottoms

Richard bottoms — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:27:15 +0000

Did St. Gladney ever get health insurance? Wait a few more weeks and he can sign up for Obama’s plan.

By: narciso

narciso — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:20:14 +0000

I’ve stayed away from this site for a while as well, so the Kilkenny letter was a lie, but the fact that some people believed it was enough. That’s the bulk of much of the supposed ‘facts’ about her. CPAC, from my informal survey was probably more pro Sarah, in the winter, then that poll would indicate. Now one minor point few have noticed is her husband starts the Ironman race, the next day after the conference, so that might be a reason.

Now it’s curious the only violence has been seen at Tea Parties has beenthat directed at Gladney by SEIU thugs, yet this is made as an argument, first prompted by Boxer, because of her San Francisco background, the SLA, the Dan White shooting, Jim Jones who wasn’t violent in San Francisco, but we know how that turned out