<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE PERILS OF EPISTEMIC CLOSURE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogger Ethics And The Breitbart/Sherrod Story</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-1769709</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger Ethics And The Breitbart/Sherrod Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=5995#comment-1769709</guid>
		<description>[...] have to be a government entity, as Rick Moran noted in his post on the Breitbart affair, it could be anyone: Perhaps it’s not so much what Breitbart did but what he failed to do; explain the context of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have to be a government entity, as Rick Moran noted in his post on the Breitbart affair, it could be anyone: Perhaps it’s not so much what Breitbart did but what he failed to do; explain the context of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Right Wing Nut House » THE PERILS OF EPISTEMIC CLOSURE -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-1769705</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Right Wing Nut House » THE PERILS OF EPISTEMIC CLOSURE -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=5995#comment-1769705</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by reader_iam, jt. jt said: Right Wing Nut House » THE PERILS OF EPISTEMIC CLOSURE: The lock-step response on the right to the Sherrod video b... http://bit.ly/dwBlvr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by reader_iam, jt. jt said: Right Wing Nut House » THE PERILS OF EPISTEMIC CLOSURE: The lock-step response on the right to the Sherrod video b&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/dwBlvr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dwBlvr</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-1769703</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Quotes of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=5995#comment-1769703</guid>
		<description>[...] more importantly, it prevents both sides from talking to each other as each is in possession of a separate reality that neither recognizes as the truth.      [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more importantly, it prevents both sides from talking to each other as each is in possession of a separate reality that neither recognizes as the truth.      [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epistemic Closure And JournoList</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-1769701</link>
		<dc:creator>Epistemic Closure And JournoList</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=5995#comment-1769701</guid>
		<description>[...] where he talks about Andrew Breitbart and the Shirley Sharrod affair, Rick Moran also points out the real lesson that should be drawn from the JournoList &#8220;scandal&#8221; that I wrote about earlier: The Journolist was a self-reinforcing feeback loop of  consensus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where he talks about Andrew Breitbart and the Shirley Sharrod affair, Rick Moran also points out the real lesson that should be drawn from the JournoList &#8220;scandal&#8221; that I wrote about earlier: The Journolist was a self-reinforcing feeback loop of  consensus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Andrew Breitbart, And The Conservative New Media, Failed</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/07/22/the-perils-of-epistemic-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-1769699</link>
		<dc:creator>How Andrew Breitbart, And The Conservative New Media, Failed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=5995#comment-1769699</guid>
		<description>[...] on Dan Riehl&#8217;s Human Events article In Defense Of Andrew Breitbart, Rick Moran explains why the Shirley Sherrod affair is a perfect example of epistemic closure on the right side of the ai... It’s not so much what Breitbart did but what he failed to do; explain the context of the video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Dan Riehl&#8217;s Human Events article In Defense Of Andrew Breitbart, Rick Moran explains why the Shirley Sherrod affair is a perfect example of epistemic closure on the right side of the ai&#8230; It’s not so much what Breitbart did but what he failed to do; explain the context of the video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
