“I think what we’ve discovered is a smoking gun,” (Jerome)Corsi said. (Corsi is co-author of “Unfit for Command“) “We knew when we wrote ‘Unfit for Command’ that Kerry had met with Madame Binh and then promoted her peace plan.”

“This document enables us to connect the dots,” he emphasized. “We now have evidence Madame Binh was directing the antiwar movement … and the person who implemented her strategy was John Kerry.” (WND: 10/26/04)

For going on thirty years, I defended people like John Kerry from my conservative friends who thought that the anti-war movement was anti-American and amounted to treason against the United States. I always believed the protesters were wrong-headed. I thought that they were Lenin’s “useful idiots,” unintentionally giving aid and comfort to the enemy while undermining Nixon’s efforts to get our troops home with some semblance of honor. I took this position because of family members who vehemently opposed the war but who I knew were, at bottom, acting on what they believed what was best for America.

Then, in the early 90’s as documents surfaced following the collapse of the old Soviet Union, it was discovered that some of the leaders of the anti-war movement were in fact in contact with Soviet agents, received money from KGB sources, and willingly and knowingly worked with the sworn enemies of this country to defeat the United States on the field of battle. Groups like The World Council of Churches received funds to publish full page ads in the New York Times against the war while others, including newsmen and prominent anti-war activists were mentioned prominently in soviet cable traffic from the era.

So it didn’t come as a total shock that documents have now surfaced showing that John Forbes Kerry, scion of an old-line, honorable American family, is a traitor.

What IS shocking is that, unless the conservative press organs start shouting this story from the rooftops thus forcing the mainstream media to deal with the accusations, John Kerry may very well be elected President of the United States. Think of it…a man who betrayed his country in his youth by working with an enemy during war time to ADVANCE THE CAUSE OF THAT ENEMY ON THE BATTLEFIELD AND AT THE CONFERENCE TABLE COULD HOLD THE LIFE AND DEATH OF THE UNITED STATES IN HIS HANDS.

The web of Kerry lies about his dealings with the enemy are extensive. While admitting to only one meeting in Paris while on his honeymoon in 1970 with “both sides” to ascertain the status of POW’s, the FBI has evidence of one other meeting in 1971 where Kerry met with the head of the Viet Cong delegation, one Madame Binh, to apparently coordinate the activities of Kerry’s group Viet Nam Veterans Against the War.

It should be noted that Kerry took his honeymoon in Jamaica and that when in Paris in 1970, Kerry met with “both” sides alright…both the Viet Cong insurgents and the North Vietnamese Government!

The documents were discovered in an archive at the Viet Nam Archive at Texas Tech University and had their authenticity verified by archivist Stephen Maxner.

A story in today’s “New York Sun,” reveals what the documents (translated from Vietnamese) have to say about the traitorous activities of John Kerry:

“The CDEC Viet Cong document titled “Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US” notes, “The spontaneous antiwar movements in the US have received assistance and guidance from the friendly (VC/NVN) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks.” It also notes that “The seven-point peace proposal (of the SVN Provisional Revolutionary Government) [the Viet Cong proposal advanced by one of its envoys, Madame Binh, operating out of Paris] not only solved problems concerning the release of US prisoners but also motivated the people of all walks of life and even relatives of US pilots detained in NVN to participate in the antiwar movement.”

The significance of the documents lies in the way they dovetail with activities of the young Mr. Kerry as he led the VVAW anti-war movement in the spring of 1971.”

The “seven point peace proposal” was propaganda. In the privacy of the Paris peace talks, the communist delegations issued much more outrageous proposals, including not releasing POW’s until after the “reunification” of the two Viet Nams and the overthrow of the South Vietnamese government by the US Army.

Now…read what Kerry did after he got back from the above mentioned second meeting in Paris with the communists:

The purpose of these meetings by the two top VVAW members, Messrs. Hubbard and Kerry, has always been assumed to be informational. But the documents in the Texas archive suggest another possibility. On July 23, 1971, The New York Times reported that Mr. Kerry held a demonstration in Washington in support of the “seven-point peace proposal” and, according to the Times, “Mr. Kerry, who is 27 years, introduced wives, parents and sisters of prisoners to plead for support.”

“The Times’s dispatch stated that Mr. Kerry charged “...the latest Vietcong peace offer in Paris, which promises the release of prisoners as American troops are withdrawn, is being ignored by Mr. Nixon…”

KERRY WAS DOING THE BIDDING OF HIS NEW FRIENDS FROM PARIS!

The “Sun” is much more circumspect in its interpretation of these facts. I, however, operate under no such constraints. I will, every day between now and the election, trumpet to the skies the fact that it is my belief that John F. Kerry is a man of divided loyalties and is unfit to be President of the United States.