It’s long past time.
More than 3 years have passed since passengers and crew members of Flight #93 prevented terrorists from crashing that plane into the White House while bravely and unselfishly giving their lives so that others might live.
It’s time these passengers received the nation’s highest military award; the Congressional Medal of Honor.
One of three criteria must be met for the award to be given:
a.) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;
b.) while engaged in military operations involving an opposing foreign force; or,
c.) while serving with friendly forces engaged in armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.
Arguably, the passengers meet two of those criteria. They were engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States. And their attempt to take the plane back can easily be construed as a “military operation.”
So why haven’t we seen any action on this? Why hasn’t the President or Congress done anything?
At the very least, these citizens deserve Congressional Gold Medals for “distinguished service and achievement.” But none has been forthcoming. And the reason, I believe is political.
The reasoning goes like this: If you give medals to the passengers of flight #93, why not medals to the firemen and policemen who perished on that awful day? And why stop there? Why not give one to everyone who died as a result of those attacks?
While I certainly do not wish to begrudge anything to the heroes who gave their lives at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, I believe a distinction can and should be made for the passengers of that plane who found themselves in a situation rare in American history.
We know from transcripts that passengers had actually taken a vote on whether or not to attack the hijackers. We also know the names of some of the leaders of that effort. And while recognizing that not all passengers participated equally in the plan to storm the cockpit, we should acknowledge the sacrifice of all who were aboard.
We should all urge that politics be put aside and that the heroes of Flight #93 be honored for their courage and valor.
11/24/2004
MEDALS OF HONOR FOR HEROES OF FLIGHT #93
CATEGORY: General
By: Rick Moran at 8:29 am
One Response to “MEDALS OF HONOR FOR HEROES OF FLIGHT #93”
RSS feed for comments on this post.
The URI to Trackback this entry:
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2004/11/24/medals-of-honor-for-heroes-of-flight-93/trackback/
Leave a comment
8:45 pm
[...] Rick at RWN has an idea that I think is worthy of being passed on. He has written about this before and now it’s up on center stage again. Almost a year and a half ago, I did a post advocating the awarding of Medals of Honor to the passengers of Flight #93. Now that the movie United 93 is set to be released April 28, I think it is time once again to propose that those brave men and women who became our very first warriors in the War on Terror be given the highest decoration that can be given to an American citizen. And the movie is sure to stir up some memories for many of us. The criteria for awarding the Medal of Honor can be found here. The eligibility requirements are pretty straightforward. One of three conditions must be met: a.) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States; b.) while engaged in military operations involving an opposing foreign force; or, c.) while serving with friendly forces engaged in armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party. The passengers of Flight #93 meet one of those criteria. Al Qaeda is certainly “an enemy of the United States†and by storming the cockpit, our people certainly “engaged in an action†against that enemy. [...]