David Limbaugh links to this Jonathan Chait article in the LA Times regarding Democratic prospects for 2008. It seems our friends from Moonbatville still “dont get it.” When your three most promising prospects are a raving loon, a brain-dead stiff, and a wonkish harridan, it may be time to pass the kool-aid and commit an existential form of hari-kari. Here’s Limbaugh’s take on Dean:
“As for Howard Dean, Chait correctly argues that Dean is a mistake because he fires up the Democratic base and only the base, which isn’t enough to win the election…The base we’re talking about here, folks, is largely the antiwar crowd. Despite Kerry’s many “winks and nods,” the base was probably never really secure in their hope that Kerry would carry their antiwar water when he was promising, essentially, to do just the opposite.”
Limbaugh correctly points to the base being certified members of the conspiracy muck-mucks at the Democratic Underground whose looniness has been well documented on this and other more rational sites. It should go without saying that rationality and the “anti-war base” are mutually exclusive terms since the moonbats aren’t only anti-war; they’re also anti-globalization, anti-capitalist, anti-western civilization, and anti-anything-that-would-make-life-easier-and-safer-for-a majority-of-human-beings-on-the-planet. In short, they’re luddites (“one who is opposed to especially technological change”).
What about the Senator from Viet Nam?
“Chait is also correct that Kerry would be a disaster in 2008. Who knows, by that time Kerry might even be forced, by the continuous rise of the New Media, to sign form 180 to release his military records. That would end his dreams. Beyond that, Kerry was always a default candidate running on an ever-uncertain, shifting platform whose only common denominator was his narcissistic desire to become president—not for what he could do for the country, but for what he could do for John Kerry.”
Spot on. Someone is going to get a hold of those records in the next couple of years and write a book. And when it comes out that Kerry was in fact a willing accomplice to the murderous thugs of North Viet Nam by coordinating the activities of his anti-war group in America with the enemies of the United States, it will end his life-long pursuit of power.
And what of the Wicked Witch of the East? Whither Hillary?
“To me, her problem is that she is every bit as liberal as people believe/fear she is and is only pretending not to be to position herself. So she represents the worst of all worlds: an extreme liberal—a quasi-socialist actually—and a fraud. Like John Kerry, she simply won’t be candid about who she is. Will she be wearing a Yankees Cap in 2008 or one with a U.S. Flag?”
Republicans should be salivating at the prospect of a Hillary run in 2008. Can you imagine how much money could be raised by every Republican running for office from dog catcher to President? And Hillary may have her own “problems.” The Marc Rich pardon by her husband may come back to haunt her as Rich, along with several other prominent Democrats, are under investigation for campaign finance irregularities connected with her run for the Senate in 2000. This, however, may hurt her more in her Senate run in 2006 than in a run for the top spot in 2008.
The real problem with Hillary is her participation in the longest running and weirdest soap opera in American political history; her on again off again relationship with The Great Oxygen Sucker, the Gigantic Egotistical Attention Seeker, the Great Philanderer, her husband Bill.
I’d personally love to see Hilly get the nod in 2008. Just to see them on stage at the Democratic Convention would be worth all of the fawning, nauseating, breathless media attention these two low-life pond scum, vomit bags would get. And wouldn’t you just LOVE to see the the harridan’s face the first time someone suggests that Bill is getting more attention than her? She may put the “Dean Scream” to shame if some poor, unsuspecting reporter were to ask.
Anything can happen between now and the next Presidential campaign. All we can do is pray that the Democrats stay as totally clueless as they are now. If these three lickspittles are the best they can come up with, the obituary writers of the Democratic party would be wise to get a jump on the competition and start scribbling now.
11/27/2004
THREE BLIND MICE
CATEGORY: General
By: Rick Moran at 6:48 am
3 Responses to “THREE BLIND MICE”
RSS feed for comments on this post.
The URI to Trackback this entry:
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2004/11/27/three-blind-mice/trackback/
Leave a comment
2:00 pm
betting sports handicapping
idle Boca Pamela squires glacier totter Spuds Babelizes world cup odds http://www.betting-anywhere.com/world-cup-odds.html
9:01 am
[...] kiawa island [...]
10:11 am
play 7 card stud, seven card stud, card stud, 7 card stud online
Call tight card stud game .