Is there any relevance at all to the salutation that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad used in his letter to President Bush? Was it just a throw away line that had no meaning? Or was it a specific warning to America and the west to convert to Islam or be conquered?
Taken by itself, the line as translated “Peace only unto those who follow the true path.” would seem to indicate more religious hyperbole from the the man we are assured by our intellectual betters is only talking in apocalyptic terms for “domestic consumption.” Let him rant, they tell us, for Iran is no danger to the United States and after all, we’ve been beastly to them in the past, haven’t we?
But if that ending salutation was included deliberately – and given the huge importance placed by the Iranians on the letter this seems a pretty good bet – then one is left to ponder what exactly President Ahmadinejad meant when he used it.
Is the Iranian President echoing the Prophet Mohamed from 1500 years ago?
It is a phrase with historical significance in Islam, for, according to Islamic tradition, in year six of the Hejira – the late 620s – the prophet Mohammad sent letters to the Byzantine emperor and the Sassanid emperor telling them to convert to the true faith of Islam or be conquered. The letters included the same phrase that President Ahmadinejad used to conclude his letter to Mr. Bush. For Mohammad, the letters were a prelude to a Muslim offensive, a war launched for the purpose of imposing Islamic rule over infidels.
The exact words? Pretty chilling, that. But as I said, are we taking these words out of context? After all, this is not the 7th century and no one in their right mind would declare war on America and the west, right?
Here’s the Iranian President talking about exactly what he means during his visit to Indonesia:
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said here Thursday that his letter to President George W. Bush did not concern the nuclear dossier, but rather was an invitation to Islam and the prophets culture.He made the above remarks in reply to a reporter while attending press conference on his letter to President Bush in Jakarta in the afternoon of the third day of his stay in Jakarta. Stressing that the letter was beyond the nuclear issue, the chief executive said that in principle, the country’s nuclear case is not so significant to make him write a letter about it.
“We act according to laws and our activities are quite clear. We are rather intent on solving more fundamental global matters.â€
“The letter was an invitation to monotheism and justice, which are common to all divine prophets. If the call is responded positively, there will be no more problems to be solved,†added the president.
The president said that the letter actually contained a clear message of invitation to human beliefs, adding that its response will determine the future.
The fact that this statement reconciles with what he wrote throughout his letter to President Bush should give any thinking person in the western world pause to consider how exactly Ahmadinejad might go about making good on this “invitation.”
Of course, our betters are already assuring us that Ahmadinejad was only speaking truth to power when he wrote that strange, insulting letter to the President. He, like his ideological soulmate Adolph Hitler, only used such language and such a tone to get attention. They are not really serious about “ridding Europe of the Jew menace” or “wiping Israel off the map.” This is all exaggerated rhetoric and therefore not even worth writing about. Best to portray the Iranian as a reasonable sort, someone the west can do business with if only we stopped being so darn insistent that someone be allowed to take a close look at his nuclear program to make sure (and believe me, we’re sure) that he’s not building one of those nuke thingies.
I am perplexed that we in the west have become so supine about our invincibility that when someone who has proven in thought, word, and deed that they are the mortal enemy of everything we hold near and dear to our hearts – that which falls under the rubric of “western liberal democracy – and then spells out in language that his culture and background tell him is a merciful warning to the infidel to change or be consumed, at which point we do absolutely nothing, I wonder if we in the west still has what it takes to defend our values and our beliefs.
Has Ahmadinejad taken note of our disinterest? I daresay we will regret the day we find out the answer to that question.
UPDATE: FROM OUR “HOLY SH*T!” FILE
The IAEA bumblers have apparently stumbled across some uranium residue that has been enriched far beyond anything the Iranians need for nuclear fuel. While further tests are needed, the residue tested is “beyond” weapons grade:
The U.N. atomic agency found traces of highly enriched uranium at an Iranian site linked to the country’s defense ministry, diplomats said Friday, adding to concerns that Tehran was hiding activities aimed at making nuclear arms.The diplomats, who demanded anonymity in exchange for revealing the confidential information, said the findings were preliminary and still had to be confirmed through other lab tests. But they said the density of enrichment appeared to be close to or above the level used to make nuclear warheads.
Still, they said, further analysis could show that the traces match others established to have come from abroad. The International Atomic Energy Agency determined earlier traces of weapons-grade uranium were imported on equipment from Pakistan that Iran bought on the black market during nearly two decades of clandestine activity discovered just over three years ago.
Why the IAEA has not revealed this is obvious; if they did so, then they would have to do something about it. And that means confrontation, something that ElBaradei and his cohorts try to avoid at all costs. Never mind that their job is to “speak truth to nuclear power.” Never mind that the Security Council relies on them to give members all the facts so that one of the momentus decisions of the young century can be made.
Is this what has emboldened Ahmadinejad? Could it be possible, even remotely, that the Iranians already have the bomb or are within an angel’s hair of building one?
I want to disbelieve what this news portends. But frankly, I do not trust the IAEA and ElBaradei to stop any country from developing nuclear weapons if they are so inclined. If Iran did indeed (as many suspected as recently as 6 months ago) have a two track nuclear program with greater urgency and secrecy given to the military end, it is remotely possible that they are much further along in developing a working nuclear weapon than we have been led to believe by our own experts as well as the CIA.
Will we even hear if the IAEA determines that the uranium residue is not from equipment bought in Pakistan but is actually the result of experiments done on site in Iran?
Don’t go there….
12:52 pm
We’ll be able to tell if the Uranium is Pakistani or not. I suspect that it is. The possibility that Iran already has HEU is pretty remote. They’ve only had the centrifuge technology for a couple of years (from the AQ Khan network), and they are still working through many of the engineering problems associated with building large cascades. Even their 164 centrifuge cascade experienced a crash.
We’ll wait and see what the tests reveal, however.
12:58 pm
I hope to hell you’re right. And I agree that the possibility that they’ve achieved that level of expertise is remote.
But we still don’t know everything Khan was selling in his bazarr. Might he have been able to slip a few kilos of weapons grade uranium into Iran? Since he won’t talk to us anymore, we might not ever know. But I can’t be the only one perplexed by this fellow Ahmadinejad. He seems so brazen in his threats, so matter of fact about them. Is he really bluffing?
2:05 pm
It’s really hard to tell how seriously we should take the rhetoric. Part of the problem isn’t just individuals, like Ahmadinejad, but deciphering the thinking and decision-making processes of closed regimes like Iran’s. I don’t think the Iranian’s are fully aware of how seriously we take this issue. I don’t think they’re as insular and self-deluding as Saddam was (if you haven’t read anything from the IPP yet, please do – the latest issue of Foreign Affairs has a great article), but it’s certainly possible they think their hand is stronger than it actually is. I think they’re emboldened by Iraq and feel relatively safe from attack.
This is one reason I support some direct talks with them, even if it’s behind the scenes. We need to make sure they are aware of how seriously we take this situation, and the consequences they’ll face if they continue with a weapons program. I’m not necessarily advocating threats since threats often have the opposite effect of their intent. Iran cannot be swayed by threats alone.
The nuclear program is very popular in Iran and would continue regardless of who is in power. There isn’t much we can do to stop it, as they do have a right to enrich uranium for nuclear fuel. But we can make it clear that they’d better play ball with inspections and tough preventative measures on weaponization.
Overall, I’m not hopeful on keeping nukes out of Iranian hands. Eventually, if they have the will, they will acquire them. There aren’t any good options at this point, which sucks.
2:33 pm
YAWN
5:17 pm
I find your insights…well, insightful. I’ve yet to encounter such a take on the letter. Most of the rhetoric from Washington simply dismisses the letter on the basis that it’s unrelated to nuclear proliferations. But critics are saying that the letter was meant as an outstretched hand to Bush. They share a common faith. Islam and Christianity believe in the same God. “Allah,” as I’m sure everyone knows, is Arabic for “God.” They share the same prophets and creation myth, as well.
What to look out for, however, is Russia’s counter to Cheney’s accusations that Putin takes away civil liberties. Putin declared this week that he will increase military spending in an effort to keep up with the U.S. in case of a conflict. Remember that the U.S. armed Iran in the late 1940s to stop Russia from moving south and threatening the west’s stronghold in the Middle East. But Russia has continually opposed British and U.S. presence in the MIddle East (see Iraq war). Also consider that the U.S. armed Osama bin Laden and the Afghanistan Taliban to keep Russia out, which was a success. These are troubling times, to be cliched, and a Iran is not as far from gaining allies as the U.S. claims.
6:58 pm
Ahmadinejad’s letter was an invitation to Bush to Dawa..to accept Islam peacefully. In terms of preperation an Islamic caliphate jihad, this is EXACTLY the proper protocol. As for Iran’s nukes, read this:J O S H U A P U N D I T: The nuclear project Ahmadinejad didn’t brag about
If the mullahs don’t already have nukes, purloined from the unaccounted for Ukrainian arsenal, they will have them in three years tops once the hidden site at Neyshabour goes online in 2007.
Bush had better begin to figure out how he’s planning on handling this.
And certain people with a small `d’ after their names had better wake up to the fact we’re in an existential war.
8:47 pm
Iran Has That Hi-Pro Glow To It
Peaceful purposes huh? That glow that Ahmadinejad may have been seeing was his nuclear weapons scientists getting ever closer to obtaining enough enriched uranium to build nuclear weapons.
10:10 pm
According to some bloggers….
....Iran has declared war on the US. Read the details and make up your own mind.
UPDATE: Some
12:49 am
khxrzsbk
ctllghticg ffqmhdxty xliispegmxo useypahmcty