Trying desperately to spin the meager bits of good news coming out of Iraq into more proof of failure and defeat, the Democrats and the left have completely left our plane of reality and embarked on a sight seeing trip to La-La Land.
How else can you explain their laughable contention that their immoral, milquetoast resolutions on Iraq have been vindicated by news that the Pentagon plans on drawing down our forces in Iraq 5% by September (conditions on the ground permitting) with another 15% by the end of 2007 being able to come home (again, conditions permitting).
Of course, John Kerry’s resolution would not have had 20% of the troops home by the end of 2007 but rather 100% with nary a word contained in that dubious document about whether or not or boys should stay if they were needed by the Iraqi government. That little detail must have slipped his mind.
And, the so-called Levin alternative resolution was even murkier on the subject, although the floor speeches made by Democrats gave the game away before they even voted. Universally (and this is the mercifully short version) they believe the War is a failure, George Bush is incompetent, and it’s time to leave so that we can blame him for the defeat in time to get enough Democrats elected in November in order to take control of Congress.
An immoral, cynical ploy ‘tis true. But then, when it comes to our national security, never let it be said that anyone cut in front of the Democrats when it came time to surrender.
The problem with the Democratic “Plan” is that it has always existed in a vacuum. The primary argument made by Republicans is that basically, you can’t run the war from Washington (Too bad Rummy didn’t take that advice very often). Any draw down of American forces must be tied to some kind of real-world, on the ground progress by Iraqi forces to deal with the violence. Do the Democrats think it a coincidence that 2 weeks and more than 500 operations after the death of the Merry Beheader al-Zarqawi that the military feels that we can reduce our troops strength? We captured or killed more than 1000 al Qaeda in Iraq operatives, sympathizers, and jihadists. We smashed their logistical infrastructure. And this is after the not-so-dearly-departed Zarqawi had written that the situation in Iraq was “bleak” for his terrorist buddies.
Or had we forgotten all that?
Surely there is a political element involved in reducing our troop strength. But to say that would be the only reason is ridiculous and, I might add, disingenuous in the extreme. Do the Democrats wish us to believe that their little dog and pony show last week with the Iraq resolutions was done solely for altruistic reasons? Who are they trying to kid?
Senator McConnell laid out the argument quite well:
Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell said lawmakers discussed the situation in Iraq with Casey before votes taken by Congress last week. But he said the point of the debate was that “Congress ought not to be dictating to the generals what the tactics are.”“We want the conditions on the ground and the decisions of our commanders, in conjunction with the new Iraqi democratic government, to dictate the process, not the Congress trying to act like armchair generals,” the Kentucky Republican told ABC’s “This Week.”
Senator Boxer, on the other hand, is clueless:
“Here we have a situation where Democrats, 80 percent of us, voted to say we ought to start reducing our troop presence there—and again, we got pummeled,” Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, told CBS. “And now, it turns out, we’re in synch with General Casey.”
I would say Babs was more in synch with Zarqawi than General Casey. The fact is, the plan has always been to draw down troops in coordination with the Iraqi’s ability to defend themselves. As Iraqi National Security Adviser Sherwan Alwaeli revealed, there is an unofficial withdrawal plan heavily dependent on not only the numbers of Iraqi troops trained but also their combat capabilities. That kind of judgment cannot be made by Democratic Senators counting fingers and toes in order to come up with a cool sounding number for the voters in November.
It is unbelievable to me that despite the Republicans doing everything possible to lose in November that the Democrats haven’t virtually locked up control of at least the House and perhaps even the Senate. I think it indicative of how much the American people truly distrust the Democrats on national security. And judging by their statements this past weekend about possible withdrawals by American forces from Iraq, they have a long way to go to convince anyone that they are dead serious about protecting the United States from attack.
4:34 pm
Lol…timelines…amnesty, for the left you say…??? Laughable.
5:03 pm
As Iraqi National Security Adviser Sherwan Alwaeli revealed, there is an unofficial withdrawal plan heavily dependent on not only the numbers of Iraqi troops trained but also their combat capabilities.
If there is a public formula, and not one created via ex-post-facto curve fitting on made-up numbers, this is not arguably a politically-timed withdrawal plan. Otherwise, it is arguably a politically-timed withdrawal plan, e.g. Operation Save The Republican Majority.
Americans had a lot of practice spotting political timing with the multitude of alert-level changes. They might have been wrong much of the time, but people are good at seeing patterns (even if the apparent pattern is just an artifact).
5:31 pm
If the dim-wits would listen instead of screaming their daily anti-american rants they would have known the reductions were coming. It’s always been “when the Iraqi’s stand up, we will stand down”. Almost every day there have been briefings indicating the rapid progress the Iraqi military forces and police were making. It was fun watching the brain dead dim-wits make fools of themselves with their idiot bills in the Senate. Again dim-wits, you snooze, you lose. Seeing the ‘Brains’ (Murtha and Sheehan) of the democratic party in operation has been more fun than a real circus. I noticed today that President was really happy, guess he got to watch the carnival of dim-wits over the weekend.
6:16 pm
Srapiron, how is the rapid progress the Iraqi military forces and police are making measured? For example, rhetorical question: if these forces mostly join one side or the other in a low-grade civil war, are matters really improving?
The various metrics I’ve seen regarding the objective on-the-ground realities appear to indicate no progress in a lot of measures, minor negative progress in some others, minor positive progress in others. [Cell phone usage is way up though]
5:23 am
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13558539/site/newsweek/
Coming soon to RW Nut House… we were against amnesty, before we were for it, but now we are against it yet again. Just show us the door, please!
8:13 am
Again with the “I question the timing, what with elections right around the corner and campaigning in nearly full swing.”
Has anyone else noticed that campaigning never stops?? Elections are always right around the corner these days.
Of course, there is that week to ten days just after a national election when we take a deep breath and “question the timing” because of some other unrelated event of the moment. “Yeah, they’re just doing that now to take attention off of [insert inane argument here].
Personally, I question the timing of all timing questioners.
5:38 pm
Why It is So Important That The NYT CONTINUE to Reveal The Truth
Last week’s revelation of another secret anti terrorist and anti American program of the Bush Administration brought the normal kill the messenger response from the right wing whackos. They immediately jumped on the you are helping the terrorists camp…