contact
Main
Contact Me

about
About RightWing NutHouse

Site Stats

blog radio



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

testimonials

"Brilliant"
(Romeo St. Martin of Politics Watch-Canada)

"The epitome of a blogging orgasm"
(Cao of Cao's Blog)

"Rick Moran is one of the finest essayists in the blogosphere. ‘Nuff said. "
(Dave Schuler of The Glittering Eye)

archives
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004

search



blogroll

A CERTAIN SLANT OF LIGHT
ABBAGAV
ACE OF SPADES
ALPHA PATRIOT
AM I A PUNDIT NOW
AMERICAN FUTURE
AMERICAN THINKER
ANCHORESS
AND RIGHTLY SO
ANDREW OLMSTED
ANKLEBITING PUNDITS
AREOPAGITICA
ATLAS SHRUGS
BACKCOUNTRY CONSERVATIVE
BASIL’S BLOG
BEAUTIFUL ATROCITIES
BELGRAVIA DISPATCH
BELMONT CLUB
BETSY’S PAGE
Blacksmiths of Lebanon
Blogs of War
BLUEY BLOG
BRAINSTERS BLOG
BUZZ MACHINE
CANINE PUNDIT
CAO’S BLOG
CAPTAINS QUARTERS
CATHOUSE CHAT
CHRENKOFF
CINDY SHEEHAN WATCH
Classical Values
Cold Fury
COMPOSITE DRAWLINGS
CONSERVATHINK
CONSERVATIVE THINK
CONTENTIONS
DAVE’S NOT HERE
DEANS WORLD
DICK McMICHAEL
Diggers Realm
DR. SANITY
E-CLAIRE
EJECT! EJECT! EJECT!
ELECTRIC VENOM
ERIC’S GRUMBLES BEFORE THE GRAVE
ESOTERICALLY.NET
FAUSTA’S BLOG
FLIGHT PUNDIT
FOURTH RAIL
FRED FRY INTERNATIONAL
GALLEY SLAVES
GATES OF VIENNA
HEALING IRAQ
http://blogcritics.org/
HUGH HEWITT
IMAO
INDEPUNDIT
INSTAPUNDIT
IOWAHAWK
IRAQ THE MODEL
JACKSON’S JUNCTION
JO’S CAFE
JOUST THE FACTS
KING OF FOOLS
LASHAWN BARBER’S CORNER
LASSOO OF TRUTH
LIBERTARIAN LEANINGS
LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS
LITTLE MISS ATTILA
LIVE BREATHE AND DIE
LUCIANNE.COM
MAGGIE’S FARM
MEMENTO MORON
MESOPOTAMIAN
MICHELLE MALKIN
MIDWEST PROGNOSTICATOR
MODERATELY THINKING
MOTOWN BLOG
MY VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY
mypetjawa
NaderNow
Neocon News
NEW SISYPHUS
NEW WORLD MAN
Northerncrown
OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY
PATRIOTIC MOM
PATTERICO’S PONTIFICATIONS
POLIPUNDIT
POLITICAL MUSINGS
POLITICAL TEEN
POWERLINE
PRO CYNIC
PUBLIUS FORUM
QUESTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
RACE42008
RADICAL CENTRIST
Ravenwood’s Universe
RELEASE THE HOUNDS
RIGHT FROM LEFT
RIGHT VOICES
RIGHT WING NEWS
RIGHTFAITH
RIGHTWINGSPARKLE
ROGER L. SIMON
SHRINKRAPPED
Six Meat Buffet
Slowplay.com
SOCAL PUNDIT
SOCRATIC RYTHM METHOD
STOUT REPUBLICAN
TERRORISM UNVEILED
TFS MAGNUM
THE ART OF THE BLOG
THE BELMONT CLUB
The Conservative Cat
THE DONEGAL EXPRESS
THE LIBERAL WRONG-WING
THE LLAMA BUTCHERS
THE MAD PIGEON
THE MODERATE VOICE
THE PATRIETTE
THE POLITBURO DIKTAT
THE PRYHILLS
THE RED AMERICA
THE RESPLENDENT MANGO
THE RICK MORAN SHOW
THE SMARTER COP
THE SOAPBOX
THE STRATA-SPHERE
THE STRONG CONSERVATIVE
THE SUNNYE SIDE
THE VIVID AIR
THOUGHTS ONLINE
TIM BLAIR
TRANSATLANTIC INTELLIGENCER
TRANSTERRESTRIAL MUSINGS
TYGRRRR EXPRESS
VARIFRANK
VIKING PUNDIT
VINCE AUT MORIRE
VODKAPUNDIT
WALLO WORLD
WIDE AWAKES
WIZBANG
WUZZADEM
ZERO POINT BLOG


recentposts


TIME TO FORGET MCCAIN AND FIGHT FOR THE FILIBUSTER IN THE SENATE

A SHORT, BUT PIQUANT NOTE, ON KNUCKLEDRAGGERS

THE RICK MORAN SHOW: STATE OF THE RACE

BLACK NIGHT RIDERS TERRORIZING OUR POLITICS

HOW TO STEAL OHIO

IF ELECTED, OBAMA WILL BE MY PRESIDENT

MORE ON THOSE “ANGRY, RACIST GOP MOBS”

REZKO SINGING: OBAMA SWEATING?

ARE CONSERVATIVES ANGRIER THAN LIBERALS?

OBAMA IS NOT A SOCIALIST

THE NINE PERCENTERS

THE RICK MORAN SHOW: MCCAIN’S GETTYSBURG

AYERS-OBAMA: THE VOTERS DON’T CARE

THAT SINKING FEELING

A DEATH IN THE FAMILY

AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY INSANE: THE MOTHER OF ALL BIDEN GAFFES

PALIN PROVED SHE BELONGS

A FRIEND IN NEED

THE RICK MORAN SHOW: VP DEBATE PREVIEW

FAITH OF OUR FATHERS

‘Unleash’ Palin? Get Real

‘OUTRAGE FATIGUE’ SETTING IN

YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEBATE ANSWERED HERE

CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST ASKS PALIN TO WITHDRAW

A LONG, COLD WINTER


categories

"24" (96)
ABLE DANGER (10)
Bird Flu (5)
Blogging (198)
Books (10)
CARNIVAL OF THE CLUELESS (68)
Caucasus (1)
CHICAGO BEARS (32)
CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE (28)
Cindy Sheehan (13)
Decision '08 (288)
Election '06 (7)
Ethics (172)
Financial Crisis (8)
FRED! (28)
General (378)
GOP Reform (22)
Government (123)
History (166)
Homeland Security (8)
IMMIGRATION REFORM (21)
IMPEACHMENT (1)
Iran (81)
IRAQI RECONCILIATION (13)
KATRINA (27)
Katrina Timeline (4)
Lebanon (8)
Marvin Moonbat (14)
Media (184)
Middle East (134)
Moonbats (80)
NET NEUTRALITY (2)
Obama-Rezko (14)
OBAMANIA! (73)
Olympics (5)
Open House (1)
Palin (5)
PJ Media (37)
Politics (649)
Presidential Debates (7)
RNC (1)
S-CHIP (1)
Sarah Palin (1)
Science (45)
Space (21)
Sports (2)
SUPER BOWL (7)
Supreme Court (24)
Technology (1)
The Caucasus (1)
The Law (14)
The Long War (7)
The Rick Moran Show (127)
UNITED NATIONS (15)
War on Terror (330)
WATCHER'S COUNCIL (117)
WHITE SOX (4)
Who is Mr. Hsu? (7)
Wide Awakes Radio (8)
WORLD CUP (9)
WORLD POLITICS (74)
WORLD SERIES (16)


meta

Admin Login
Register
Valid XHTML
XFN







credits


Design by:


Hosted by:


Powered by:
1/30/2007
ALL MY SONS
CATEGORY: "24"

One of the things I love about writing these 24 recaps is finding literary and historical parallels to the plot twists, especially those that mirror classical themes that have been used for many hundreds even thousands of years in western culture. Of course, the writers don’t consciously use the same plot devices used by Sophocles or Shakespeare. But the reason they don’t have to think about it is because many of the conflicts, the moral choices confronted by the characters, and even the characters themselves are so ingrained into our oral and literary traditions that it becomes second nature for any writer – even one who writes for a weekly TV drama – to use the threads of history and literature supplied by the masters.

Take last night’s episode, for instance. For some reason, the effort of Philip Bauer to save his son Graem from jail reminded me of Arthur Miller’s first successful Broadway play All My Sons. Miller himself used themes as old as drama itself; retribution, purification, and responsibility to your fellow man, themes he would explore even more boldly with his next play, the American classic Death of a Salesman.

But in All My Sons, Miller tells the story of a father whose overweening greed causes the company he runs to ship defective airplane parts to the army during World War II that results in the death of 21 pilots. The father convinces himself that what he did was right because he was building the business for his son and that he had a responsibility to the future of the family – even though he lied about his true involvement in the matter and covered up the fact that he had actually signed off on the shipment of the parts that he knew were going to get young men killed.

Returning home from the war, the son is unaware that his father let his business partner take the fall for what actually was his decision and he believes him when he says that he had no knowledge of the defective parts. As the play unfolds, we discover that the other son, a pilot who died during the war, actually committed suicide when he found out that his father was the one responsible for killing the 21 pilots. And the fiancee of the son who returned from the war (a powerful “messenger” character found in plays and literature from the Greeks through Chaucer) has the truth of what happened in the form of a letter from the dead son that, once revealed, causes an emotional upheaval that has the father finally being able to admit to himself that he is responsible for the deaths of the pilots.

The father talking about his dead son and the 21 pilots who perished as a result of his greed and pride:

“Sure, he was my son. But I think to him they were all my sons. And I guess they were, I guess they were.”

The universality of these themes is what attracts us to drama in the first place. Yes we like to watch things blowing up and we love to experience the tension that builds as the clock ticks and Jack races to save the country. But on a deeper level, what engages our emotions are the classical themes that have made audiences think and react for more than 2,000 years.

Philip Bauer was faced with a dilemma (or so he thought); save his son Graem from prison by covering up his “incompetence.” Most of us have already guessed that Graem is involved in this plot up to his neck but Philip can’t even imagine the evil that Graem has perpetrated on the country and his own family by facilitating the sale of nukes to a terrorist as well as his efforts to kill his own brother. In this respect, Philip’s ignorance is reminiscent of the son who returned from the war convinced that his father was innocent. And while Graem doesn’t have the conscience or the moral fiber (we think) to face up and admit to himself how evil has actions have been, it is clear that there will come a time of reckoning where Jack confronts his brother not only for his involvement in this terrorist act but also for his sins committed last year as well.

Ironic convergence as Philip realizes too late he has a bad seed for a son, recognizing a singular responsibility to mankind, and what is shaping up to be a tragic and complex denouement to the relationship between Jack and his father all call to mind the best that drama has to offer. It’s why we watch the show and get so emotionally involved in the characters. And it is what keeps us coming back week after week to experience the universal themes that the show explores, always with a silent nod to the masters whose imprint on our culture and traditions can never be erased.

SUMMARY

President Palmer continues his rather earnest and empty speech to the nation, upsetting Tom to no end because he thinks that the President isn’t facing reality. By reality, of course, Lennox means a Muslim round up and loosing Big Brother measures on American citizens.

Once again, we are treated to a dialogue on civil liberties and this time, the writers make absolutely no attempt to disguise their contempt for those who advocate an aggressive security posture:

TOM: The Constitution is wonderful, Karen, but back in the days of the Founding Fathers, the weapon at hand was a single shot musket. It took a half a minute to load and fire. Fayed just killed 12,000 people in less time without even taking aim. I love the Constitution. But I won’t be ducking behind it when the next nuke goes off.

KAREN: I’m a realist too, Tom. And I am willing to do what it takes to protect the country.

TOM: No, you’re not.

KAREN: But I’m looking a little farther down the road. These warrantless arrests and detention centers will cause irreparable damage to this country.

For the record, I would like to point out that here, as in every other civil liberties argument on the show so far, Karen has not offered one alternative action above and beyond what we assume would be normal peacetime procedures for law enforcement for either trying to track or catch the terrorists who are operating in our midst. All we get from her are platitudes and high falutin calls to honor the Constitution.

This raises some interesting questions that the show – and indeed the country itself – has failed to discuss. Are there any measures the civil liberties absolutists would endorse beyond what law enforcement is currently vouchsafed by law? If no “Patriot Act,” what then? Business as usual and a “so sorry” to the families of victims who might still be alive if measures were taken to protect the citizenry?

Obviously, Lennox’s draconian ideas about security are so broadly drawn, so cartoonish, as to be useless in this debate. But the question remains unanswered by those so vociferous in their opposition to anything and everything the government has done since 9/11 to make us safer: What would you do, if anything, to protect the people of the United States from getting killed by terrorists?

Lennox, meanwhile, has had it with Karen and plots her downfall.

At CTU, Nadia discovers that Homeland Security has flagged her because she is of Middle Eastern descent. In what I thought was a rather realistic conversation, Bill reminds Nadia that he told her at the outset that because of her background, she would be subject to unfair measures. He promises to do something about it after the crisis has passed.

Jack is really starting to party down with brother Graem, keeping a plastic bag over his dear brother’s face for nearly 6 minutes. It doesn’t surprise us that Graem is a wuss, that any physical discomfort or the threat of torture will make him spill the beans. When Jack threatens to give Graem more of the baggie treatment, the lickspittle breaks down and tells all.

Apparently, the company contracted with the Russians to decommission some small nukes and Graem didn’t vet one of the contractors thoroughly enough. The contractor – Mr. McCarthy, tooling around LA with his dizzy blond girlfriend looking for a scientist who can build a trigger for the other nukes – absconded with some of the nukes and sold them to Fayed. Jack’s father is staking out McCarthy’s office to apparently get the contractor to hide any involvement by Graem and the company in the stolen nuke caper. Anyway, that’s his story and he’s sticking to it. We know it’s a lie and that Graem knew full well that the nukes would end up in Fayed’s hands. What we don’t know yet is why. Is Graem just a greedy, amoral, slimeball or does he have another agenda at work?

Jack immediately calls CTU despite Graem’s protests that he’ll go to jail if it comes out that he was negligent. But Jack doesn’t tell Chloe (or Bill who calls later) that his father is trying to fix it so that Graem stays out of jail and that both men knew the nukes were stolen for 24 hours prior to the blast in Valencia. Disgusted, Jack takes Graem to McCarthy’s office to see if he can pick up any leads while telling Chloe to send two TAC teams to the area.

Meanwhile, McCarthy is having a devil of a time trying to find another scientist who can build a trigger that will set off the remaining nukes. To make matters worse, his stupid girlfriend is bored and wants to go to Vegas. Is she really that dumb or, as we are led to believe, does she only care about the money? And why does she remind me of a much older Kim Bauer? (Don’t go there.)

At the detention center, Walid continues to play secret agent under the admiring and not so watchful eyes of the FBI. His girlfriend, the President’s sister Sandra, is having a cow. She realizes the danger he is in but the FBI is adamant about using the businessman as an undercover operative in order to get information from what they believe is a terrorist cell in the detention center.

Back at CTU, Milo confronts Bill about how slow Nadia’s work output has gotten. Bill tells Milo about Nadia, who has been here since she was 2 years old, being flagged for her Middle Eastern origins. Of course Milo knows exactly what to do; he covers for Nadia with Morris (who has a pitch perfect sense of sarcasm and irony about everything) and then logs on to the computer using his own screen name and password so that Nadia doesn’t have to deal with the restrictions.

You know what this means, don’t you? If there is a mole at CTU this season, Nadia will almost certainly fill the bill. She’s perfect because 1) We like her; 2) She’s gorgeous; and 3) She’s such an obvious choice for the mole that we dismiss any chance of her being a traitor.

How’s that for logic?

When Bill calls Karen to get Nadia’s clearance reauthorized, Karen is shocked that a Muslim working in such a sensitive position would be flagged like this. She calls such security measures “The paranoid delusions of Tom Lennox” which very well might be true but seems a little harsh given what’s been happening recently. The mushroom cloud over Valencia can still be glimpsed if you look out the window.

And to make Lennox even more the villain, he has found a way to pressure Karen into resigning. Apparently when Bill was head of the Seattle office of CTU, they rounded up some of the usual Muslim suspects and detained them briefly before letting them go for lack of evidence. The problem for Bill is that Fayed was one of the detainees. The problem for Karen is that when she was at Homeland Security, she evidently made the file that contained that information disappear.

Lennox is a devious lout but he has a point of sorts. Can you imagine in the real world if the Washington Post got a hold of that information? Realizing that, Karen reluctantly agrees to resign.

The President is mightily displeased at Karen’s decision and tries to talk her out of it, saying that he needs opposing points of view. Karen responds that the President is his own best counsel. “You know what to do,” she tells him. She requests reassignment to CTU and the President agrees, approving her for military transport which means that we’ll see Karen again in a couple of hours.

At the detention center, Walid discovers that the inmates have been able to track what’s going on outside the fence because of a smuggled cell phone. Tasked by the FBI to steal the phone, Walid pulls a pretty nifty trick, feigning illness while falling against the inmate with the phone and taking it out of his pocket.

The idea that the FBI missed the phone in the first place is pretty farfetched. But where would Walid have developed his pick pocketing technique? Must be something they teach at Harvard Business School.

The Feds tell Walid to call a special number that allows Chloe to work some of her geek magic and download all the numbers called (and perhaps called into) the phone. This was the easy part. Now Walid has to return the phone to the owner before he discovers it’s gone. This apparently was something they didn’t teach at Harvard because as the seconds tick by and Chloe tries to decipher the encoded information, Walid doesn’t even attempt to return the item.

What’s worse, we discover that the phone has been used as a browser that accessed a radical jihadist website where the information about the additional nukes was in the open for all to see. Too busy spying on innocent Americans, the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, and the rest of our vaunted intelligence community missed the message that an inmate at a federal detention center knew exactly where to look.

But the real bad news is that we are informed that the men that Walid is spying on are not dedicated terrorists but simply, as Chloe so politically correctly informs us, “spectators” and, by inference, shouldn’t even be locked up.

Okay, I surrender. It is not a crime to read about killing a lot of Americans. It is not even a crime to talk about killing a lot of Americans. But what do we do with people who have demonstrated an interest in this sort of thing? According to the civil liberties absolutists, we can’t even keep track of them without getting a warrant. And no judge in America would issue one under those circumstances. Hence, potential terrorists are allowed to operate with impunity. Is this the price we pay for freedom? If those potential terrorists have 4 suitcase nukes ready to blow, I guess so. Better that tens of thousands of Americans die than people who have demonstrated an interest in facilitating that act be watched carefully.

This is an argument that has been glossed over by the civil liberties absolutists. They can never quite bring themselves to come out and state the obvious; it is better that thousands of people die or even that the US as we know it is destroyed rather than stretch the Constitution to keep track of people who may or may not be innocent but share an interest in seeing that happen.

In the end, Walid pays for his inability to sneak the phone back to the inmate and he is attacked and brutally beaten by detainees before the FBI can intervene.

Jack makes it to McCarthy’s office with Graem in tow and starts to search for clues. He discovers McCarthy has shredded a number of files in the past 24 hours which is suspicious but he fails to uncover any useful information. Just then, Jack hears someone entering the outer office. Handcuffing Graem so that he can’t escape, Jack investigates only to get cold cocked by one of the intruders. It is here that Jack’s father Philip (played by the impressive James Cromwell) enters the scene.

Although they haven’t seen each other in 9 years, Jack and his father skip the small talk and wade right into the issue at hand; namely, McCarthy, the nukes, and why he didn’t report them stolen the moment he found out. Philip’s explanation is plausible. He didn’t want Graem to go to jail, a sentiment Graem shares enthusiastically.

When Jack tells Philip that he’s going to call CTU to get the investigation going, his father pleads with him to hold off, only relenting when he sees how determined Jack is to get to the bottom of things:

PHILLIP: We’re talking about prison, Jack. He’s your brother.

JACK:Graem knew what he was doing was wrong. He was responsible for the nukes. He should have been more careful. And the second he knew they were stolen he should have reported it.

GRAEM: Oh you always do what you should Jack. What about when Dad needed you and you disappeared?

PHILIP: C’mon, Jack. Give us a chance to clean this up.

JACK: Dad, there are four more bombs out there. I cannot – I will not be responsible for thousands and thousands of lives just to protect the family.

GRAEM: Wrong. And I think your dead wife would agree.

JACK: (Lunging for his brother’s throat) Why you Son of a…

At this point, Philip relents and tells Jack to call CTU. And in a chilling transformation that reveals just how much of an amoral scumbag Graem truly is, the security men that came in with Philip, after a signal from Graem, suddenly pull guns on both the father and the brother.

McCarthy meanwhile discovers the name of someone who can build the nuclear triggers. And unless I was hearing things, he got the name of the scientist from one of Graem’s men. This means that Philip is probably their man and will be forced to accede to the terrorists demands to help them with the nukes or watch Jack die before his eyes.

Being led away, Philip sees the car that had the CTU TAC team full of bullet holes, the two men inside dead. He realizes this is Graem’s doing and asks in a plaintive voice “Good God! What have you done?” Graem’s chilling response was “They forced my hand. Call me when its done.”

And we are left hanging, wondering exactly what “it” means and whether Jack and Philip are headed for an emotional crisis. His father was willing to save his son Graem from jail. Will he be willing to save his other son who abandoned the family so many years ago?

BODY COUNT

The Grim Reaper took a brief respite from his vacation, just to keep his hand in, I’m sure. Two CTU agents taken out by Graem’s thugs.

TOTAL:

Jack: 3

Show: 351

CHLOEISM OF THE WEEK

Chloe better start getting more face time or this feature will cease to be relevant. In lieu of anything Chloe uttered, I thought Graem’s zinger directed at Jack about his dead beloved wife was particularly cruel.

By: Rick Moran at 10:17 am
20 Responses to “ALL MY SONS”
  1. 1
    Jennie C. Said:
    10:48 am 

    Shucks, Rick, I immediately thought that Nadia must be the (a?) mole, and now everyone will think I got the idea from you. Can’t ever get ahead of you. She certainly is pretty.

    And heck, if they can turn a former American (the blonde chick from season 2, the bad sister), they can surely turn an immigrant, even one of long duration.

  2. 2
    Wes S. Said:
    10:52 am 

    Just as Tom seems to be some sort of liberal parody of a neo-con (the gang at Dave Barry’s Blog have taken to calling the character “Tancredo”), isn’t it possible that Karen is also a parody of a typical liberal Democrat? As you’ve pointed out, Karen has plenty of criticisms of Tom’s proposed security measures, but nothing in the way of a solution. In other words, her behavior on the show mirrors that of the real-life Democratic Party in the actual War on Terror that we are currently fighting.

    I think you could also draw a parallel between the paralysis, indecision and dithering of the show’s Palmer Administration in the face of the terrorist threat and the actual Bush Administration’s seeming inability to deal with the impending issue of a nuclear Iran. And the bureaucratic infighting in Palmer’s fictional Administration despite the crisis certainly mirrors what’s going on in real life, doesn’t it?

    Or maybe I’m just desperately trying to make sense of what has, to this point, been a really boring and implausible season, despite the cool mushroom cloud-over-LA special effect. And perhaps the most implausible thing about the season is that, despite the nuking of Valencia, it seems to be pretty much business as usual in the country…even in Los Angeles.

    Oh well, time to go perform some preventitive maintenance on the old disbelief suspension apparatus. Some of those cables are getting pretty frayed, and we’re only six episodes into the season…

  3. 3
    Hector Said:
    11:42 am 

    You need to include a Miloism of the week instead of a Chloeism. Or possibly a Chloeism/Miloism of the week. Milo is pretty good at throwing out the zingers.

  4. 4
    Rick O'Shea Said:
    12:27 pm 

    I have a view of this season different from the consensus: it’s horrible. I disagree with the drama comment, I think Jack’s brother being a nuclear terrorist (as we know he must be from last season) willing to kill his own brother goes beyond jumping the shark, it’s jumping the moon. By a cow. In a tutu.

    I really enjoyed it until this season. I will watch it and hope against hope they tie these ridiculous ends together. But I think the show is on its death throes.

  5. 5
    golfer1 Said:
    2:28 pm 

    Based on the preview of next week’s show, we know that 1) Jack lives, and manages to escape within the first half-hour, and 2) he gets to torture his brother again…

    Also, didn’t Lennox confirm 12,000 killed “at least” via the nuke? Shouldn’t we add that to the body count?

  6. 6
    Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Unmasking The Enemy Pinged With:
    3:00 pm 

    [...] More from Rick Moran [...]

  7. 7
    Rick Moran Said:
    5:13 pm 

    golfer:

    When the nuke went off, I wrote that I thought it was too serious an event to be flippant about. At that time, I said that I wouldn’t include any nuke casualties in the body count.

    A practical reason is that there is no way they can confirm that number of 12,000.

  8. 8
    Locomotive Breath Said:
    5:25 pm 

    I kept waiting for “That’ll do pig”. Maybe next week.

  9. 9
    goy Said:
    6:42 pm 

    Sadly, I agree with O’Shea. Way too contrived, this turn of events is. The story would have worked just fine without the distraction (and silliness – unless someone can point to some portents of this that I missed in S5) of “Graem” being transformed into Graem Bauer.

    I’ll keep watching, but only to see if my intuition is right and that it’s Milo who’s been turned, and who’s seen his chance for misdirection in Nadia’s predicament. He can now pull any sort of mole mischief he likes and let the blame track back to the “obvious” traitor. And his confession regarding setting her up with his ID would make it sound all the more convincing.

    Channeling Aaron Pierce in a past life… “I guess we’ll see what we’ll see.”

  10. 10
    Rick Moran Said:
    7:04 pm 

    Goy:

    Nice misdirection. I like it. Obviously, I disagree about the plot. This has wonderful possibilities. Will Jack execute his own brother? Will Dad program the nukes? Will we ever see anything of the aftermath of the blast?

    And there was speculation on the boards last year about Graem being Jack’s brother. Whether that was just lucky guessing or there were some hints dropped I don’t know.

  11. 11
    golfer1 Said:
    7:07 pm 

    Rick, mea culpa, mea culpa. I forgot about the “no-nuke body count” stipulation.

  12. 12
    goy Said:
    8:37 pm 

    Rick, I hope I’ll be surprised, but I guess part of what’s winding 24 down for me a little is that I think the answers to your questions are pretty obvious. Again, I could be wrong…

    “Will Jack execute his own brother?”
    Of course he will. Especially when he learns the details of the part he played in all the S5 events. Of course he might then off himself (“only Jack can kill Jack!”) out of sheer grief and despair. But what we’ve seen of Jack so far indicates he might think twice about Graem… then put two center mass and one in his forehead.

    “Will Dad program the nukes?”
    No doubt, if the right screws are turned – say, threatening Graem or his family, per McCarthy’s comment to Fayed regarding coercion (so far, I don’t get the impression that threats against Jack would do the trick, but revelations from their past might change that) – especially if he thinks there’s still a way to “contain” them afterward (like Cummings’ and Nathanson’s foul-up with the centox, which might lead to some nice irony). A more interesting question in my mind is: would Jack shoot Dad to prevent him from reprogramming the triggers?

    BTW, I forgot to mention earlier that I think the lickspittle act in the house was a put-on. Graem had to know Jack would be trouble based on past history. He’d have to do something about that and if I heard correctly (no TiVo here) he outright stated they should’ve had him killed instead of letting him be sent to China. He also knew all along that in leading Jack back to Dad, he’d be leading him into a trap (i.e., his goons). So there really wasn’t any reason to keep Dad’s whereabouts secret. Just the opposite. But telling Jack what he wanted to know outright might have raised suspicions (at least in the ‘sharper’ Jack whom Graem knew at the end of S5). Personally, I think it was actually Graem pushing the buttons in that scene. He probably didn’t get to wherever he is among these “untouchables” by being a lickspittle with no human intuition and no ability to manipulate people.

  13. 13
    A. Lafauce Said:
    8:41 pm 

    Rick:

    Sad that no one picked up on your “All My Sons” analogy, paralleling Greek drama makes watching television drama all the more interesting. Of course when you say that common themes are used throughout literary history you are referring to the seven deadly sins, i.e. Greed, Lust, Envy,Gluttony, Lust,Anger and sloth. however in Greek drama any character committing any of the above deadly sins resulted in his death. Oedipus being the obvious example. Modern day drama softens the punishment a tad but still requires scourging if not death.
    Its fun to make the observations and guessing the outcome based on the rules of drama, and judge the writer’s literary capabilities set down by Aristotle, as well.
    In yesterday’s episode, its not the estranged familial relationship that bears punishing, or the selling of nukes its the greed that transends all iniquity. Hence in Graem’s case, we are able to predict with some certainty that he will or rather must die, no moral judgement need be made. Now that being said, we can predict with the same certainty that the other characters will suffer the same end. Chloe for her lust will (if not already) be punished. In the end the audience will have learned that evil must be punished, even if the audience just says, “Tsk, Tsk.

  14. 14
    Johnny Tremaine Said:
    9:33 pm 

    Caught 24 this week and taped Heroes. It was a great episode, as Rick pointed out. Week to week I’ll alternate. Next week, 24 gets recorded and I’m watching Hiro Nakamura and the hot Wolverine-powered-chearleader; I need to get my geek/comics/sci-fi fix after all.

  15. 15
    The MaryHunter Said:
    7:36 am 

    Ya know, Morris comes off with some great ‘isms’ as well. If Chloe’s a bit out of dialogue these days, what about tracking “snarkism of the week” or just “ism”? Though we love Chloe, it might offer more of a chance for weekly updates.

    Also, I am pretty sure that Graem said at the end of the episode “JACK forced my hand” not “They forced my hand.” (They who?) If so, that puts a different spin on it – blame game and all – especially with all Graem’s sickeningly ironic sarcasm about Jack’s misplaced dedication to family.

    Might the Bauers have come out a tad differently if they had, say, a family game night every week when growing up? Such damaged familial goods…

  16. 16
    Fahagie Said:
    12:52 pm 

    “Karen responds that the President is his own best counsel. “You know what to do,” she tells him.”

    Was I the only one that laughed out loud at this? Just a couple hours previously the President caved to terrorist demands, setting in motion events that enabled the ‘triggerman’ to escape from US custody allowing him to set off a bomb that killed 12,000 or so. I hate to be judgmental, Mr. President, as you have the toughest job in the world, but you screwed the pooch (and 12,000 of your citizens) on that one, Mr. President. Beter she should have told him: “whatever your instincts say, do the opposite”.

    Another laugher: the innocent “spectators” morph into a lynch mob upon discovering the stolen cell phone. Here the insult wasn’t to the viewer’s intelligence but to American Muslims, who apparently have some sort of murderous gene that gravitates them towards violent group behavior when previously they were just “spectators”.

    An alternate interpretation is that this was a dig at the right – the “spectators” were provoked by aggresive law enforcement/military tactics – and that ‘fighting’ terrorism creates more terrorism. I’m sure that’s what the producers were driving at, but in real time I thought it was slanderous towards American Muslims. After all, these weren’t prisoners guilty of some sort of crime but a slice of the general population of American Muslims. Somehow I don’t think they’d depict another cohesive group of Americans similarly. I wonder if there are cases during the internment of Japanese Americans on the West Coast where there was vigilantism against collaborators? I checked Wikipedia and it’s not addressed head on but it seems like it was possible.

  17. 17
    leucanthemum b Said:
    4:40 pm 

    Rick, you mentioned Bill’s error in allowing Fayed to slip through his fingers, and Karen’s burying the file, following it with, “Can you imagine in the real world if the Washington Post got a hold of that information? ”

    You mean like the stories about the Sudan offering Osama to Clinton, and Sandy Berg(l)er’s probable removal of the documentary evidence? I think I can imagine…

    Fahagie: “I wonder if there are cases during the internment of Japanese Americans on the West Coast where there was vigilantism against collaborators?”
    Check out the Manzanar Demonstrations, at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/8420/shootings.html#manzanar .

  18. 18
    goy Said:
    8:00 pm 

    Fahagie – awesome observation on the spectators-turned-mob scene. It bothered the heck out of me when I saw it too. You put an explanation to the ‘why’.

    Also agreed on Hayes’ comment to Palmer. Unfortunately, her character doesn’t seem to be making sense on any level so far. It’s like she’s become the “platitude repository” holding all the lefty sentiment for which the writers can’t find a convincing voice. They didn’t watch enough West Wing, I guess.

  19. 19
    Jennie C. Said:
    10:55 am 

    I’m not even sure what Karen Hayes really did last year. Except get in the way and then, later, not.

  20. 20
    wrymouth Said:
    1:22 pm 

    Rick:

    I was looking forward to this season being about the day Jack escaped from the Chinese, or some sort of “Manchurian Candidate” plot, but the writers are now caught wih a Huge Success on their hands, and seem to only have a triumvirate of Eeevil Acute Events to play with: nukes, bioweapons and nerve agents.

    In that sense, Season 1 was outstanding, by concentrating more on smaller crises.

    Love the “ancient themes” hunt you are doing in 24. It adds a level of meaning to a show the missus and I find alternately riveting and awful. In brief, we usually love the arc of the plot, and cringe at whole sections of dialogue… and any sub-plot involving the “Kim” character.

    (The “Kim” character does not necessarily need to be played by “Kim,” but only by an unnecessarily dim and selfish person.)

    Best Actor So Far: President Charles Logan, er, Richard Nixon, played (we thought) unbelieveably well by Gregory Itzin.

    Next time, I hope we can have something other than nukes, because at this rate America’s going to be covered in radiation in about 3 more Days.

    Nanotech terrorism, anyone? Internet attacks? Mole presidential candidates (not just turncoats like Logan)? C’mon, people!

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to Trackback this entry:
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/30/all-my-sons/trackback/

Leave a comment