With less than a day to go before a scheduled vote on funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan takes place, the House Democratic leadership is scrambling to avoid an embarrassing defeat – largely as a result of a revolt by their far left wing:
One of the Democrats’ chief designated vote counters, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), is actively working against the Iraq war spending bill. The leadership’s senior chief deputy whip, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), spoke passionately against it on the House floor. And one of the whip organization’s regional representatives, Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), is implacably opposed.The disarray in the House whipping operation ahead of tomorrow’s expected vote on the bill is putting a harsh spotlight on House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), who has the task of rounding up the 218 votes needed to pass the $124 billion measure, but who has not even kept his organization in line.
“There’s only one test, and that will be whether we get 218 on the board on Thursday,” said House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), who predicted that Clyburn will come through with the votes.
The problem for the far left Democrats is that by their lights, we’re not surrendering fast enough. While the measure calls for all American combat troops out of Iraq by the end of August next year regardless of the situation on the ground, the far left is feeling the pressure from the netnuts who are agitating for an end to the war now, right now, right this minute:
But Lewis has not been silent. In a speech Monday night on the House floor, he made his case as convincingly as he could.“As a nation, can we hear the words of Gandhi, so simple, so true—that it’s either nonviolence or nonexistence? Can we hear the words of Martin Luther King Jr., saying that we must learn to live together as brothers and sisters or perish as fools?” Lewis asked. “Tonight, I must make it plain and clear, that as a human being, as a citizen of the world, as a citizen of America, as a member of Congress, and as an individual committed to a world at peace with itself, I will not and cannot vote for another dollar or another dime to support this war.”
That’s the spirit, Representative Lewis! Immediate and unconditional surrender. Perhaps we should start calling you “U.S. Lewis?”
The whips not only have problems with their comrades on the left, there are also quite a few Blue Dog Democrats who are uneasy about starting down the road of defunding the war while our troops are in the field:
Tanner, the Blue Dog representative on the chief deputy whip’s team, had been undecided until yesterday morning. Now that he is on board, he hastened to add that he is not about to start leaning on his Blue Dog colleagues. “I don’t ask people to vote on the leadership’s behalf, particularly on a vote like this,” he said.Kristie Greco, a spokeswoman for Clyburn, said the Democrats’ whip organization is broad and diverse, precisely so that a few defections over policy would not affect the vote-counting operation. The days of lock-step discipline under the threat of retribution went out with the Republican majority, she said.
Spoken like a true loser, Kristie. It appears that the Democrats might try to turn their legislative defeat into a public relations triumph, highlighting their incompetence by comparing their failed efforts to whip the members into line with the Republican’s success on numerous issues. After all, does it really matter how the job gets done just as long as the desired result is achieved? The threats of retribution against recalcitrant Republicans didn’t lead to any of them defecting to the Democrats and until 2006, kept them in the majority. Of course, some of the underhanded parliamentary tricks used by the GOP House leadership helped in that regard. But the fact is, when push came to shove, the GOP whip operation almost always delivered.
Ultimately, competence in leadership is judged by how well the majority functions when confronted with the biggest issues of the day. It’s easy to get a majority for a non-binding resolution expressing opposition to the war. But when the leadership gets down to brass tacks on actually what terms of surrender they wish to offer the insurgents and al-Qaeda in Iraq, their left wing balks because we don’t drop our weapons and flee while the conservatives are wary that voting for any measure that contains a timetable may associate them with the crazies in their party.
If the Republicans were smart (a big “if”), they would allow the Democrats the honor of voting for a date certain to celebrate al-Qaeda’s victory. Otherwise, they may find themselves tarred with the same broad brush used to paint the Democrats as the defeatists they truly are.
UPDATE
According to The Victory Caucus, the Dems are buying the votes they need by spreading around some pork:
Dems’ seem to have decided that their Slow Bleed strategy (v.018) won’t actually have a chance of passing on its own merits, and so they need to play Let’s Make A Deal. In other words: find a bunch of morally confused Congresscritters who think their districts absolutely must have some nice juicy pork projects, and bring ‘em the bacon, baby!It’s a great plan, really, except for the fact that it assumes that we’re still stuck somewhere in the 1970’s and such deals can be made in secret between chummy confederates wearing disturbingly wide-collared suits made entirely of synthetic fabrics while boogying down to Disco Inferno on the old 8-track. Turns out that here in Two-Thousand-And-Seven, such an approach works: not so much.
Why? Because of you, silly! The empowered citizen, given the ability by these wonderful Internets to actually read the actual words of the actual bills that your elected Representatives are actually planning on actually passing in your name. You can help us point the spotlight on the deals that are being made with this “emergency” spending bill. You can highlight the shady bargains being made by the Democratic leadership to help put lipstick on the pork-laden pig that this vitally important bill to fund our troops in harm’s way has become.
The guys over at VC need your help in identifying every piece of pork going into this supplemental spending bill. Go to the link above and follow their instructions.
8:31 am
War Bill Includes Tempting Projects
House Democratic leaders are offering billions in federal funds for lawmakers’ pet projects large a
9:35 am
“Immediate and unconditional surrender.”
uhh…forgive me for stating the obvious, but ending an occupation is not, and never will be “surrender”.
Retreat does not equal surrender, and it never will.
Though I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised by hyperbole at a place that calls itself a “nuthouse”.
9:40 am
[...] The Democrat House “Leadership” has lost control of its members as the Democrats splinter over a bill that, at its essence, fully funds the Iraq war. The far left liberals are fed up with platitudes and excuses and I seriously doubt they plan to support any more facade votes on Bills that do exactly opposite of what they want. And this can be seen as many liberals in the House leadership come out opposing the Bill slated for tomorrow’s vote (H/T Rick Moran): One of the Democrats’ chief designated vote counters, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), is actively working against the Iraq war spending bill. The leadership’s senior chief deputy whip, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), spoke passionately against it on the House floor. And one of the whip organization’s regional representatives, Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), is implacably opposed. [...]
10:24 am
How is getting our troops out from the middle of a civil war “surrendering”? To whom would we be “surrendering”, besides the will of the American people?
Our presence there has nothing to do with “terra”. We are there to control the oil. Read the PNAC from 1998. The Bush Crime Family has fooled you. They have no intention of EVER leaving. Note the permenant bases and the world’s largest embassy. You have been made a FOOL.
5:25 pm
So the Republicans are voting against funding our troops? Right? Glad you were straight on that.
7:52 pm
Much easier to throw rocks than to try and get something done. I am beginning to like this.
The Defeato-crats are so invested in defeat they cannot have the surge succeed. It must be like the walls are closing in on them. Gen. Petraeus looks like he has the right stuff.
I would veto this bill in a heart beat and make a speech about budgetary discipline on the flip side. Perfect positioning for Bush. This pork-a-saurous doesn’t deserve to see the light of day.
9:16 pm
“Coalition of the Coerced and the Bribed,” anyone?
10:52 pm
The permanent occupation of Iraq, thats what the GOP and Rick are hungry for. Sacrifice some more american boys for a lost cause. Bush and that idiot Rumsfield lost this war. No post-war planning,none. Bush should be impeached for that. Rick and the braindead gop can’t admit defeat, so we stay so some more americans die from roadside bombs. Let this ole Wisconsin boy explain this to you one more time Rick, we could stay for 100 years, the Sunni insurgency and Sadr militia will fight us for 100 years, are you with me so far? Its their country, not ours, they’ve repelled invaders for thousands of years. They will just wait us out. But no, we can’t surrender, what a bs storyline that is, like our troops will lay down their weapons and march into their prison camps, what a crock. We broke that country just like Powell said and now the neo-cons can’t fess up that a ragtag insurgency just won’t go away. Guess what Rick, most of the police and Iraq army are loyal to their militias, not Maliki. So we’ve trained and ARMED all these people who aren’t loyal to us or their government, but we should stay, wow, theres some twisted logic. The Saudi’s continue to finance the Sunni insurgency because they don’t want their Sunni brethren to be cleansed by US and Iraqi army types. Oh, and we buy billions of Saudi oil, so by proxy, were supporting the Sunni insurgency.Eventually even braindead americans will see the futility of a no-win situation and get out. But more Americans will die in the meantime because of cheerleaders like you who are too proud to admit failure. Billions wasted, thousands of deaths wasted, but big he-men like you praise the conflict, as long as your not the one doing the fighting. The army’s broken, warmongers like you are to blame, lets surge some more troops into hell, we’ll show those terrorists who’s boss. Bin Laden wants us to stay, thats why he taunts us, we’ve learned nothing in 4 years, we just keep dying.
6:31 am
Isn’t the pork disclosure the fruit of the democrats’ pork reform? (mmm…..pork fruit)