Comments Posted By flounder
Displaying 11 To 13 Of 13 Comments
FOLEY MATTER PROVES REPUBLICANS SUPPORT PERVERTS
Now Rep. Shinkus is saying that both he and the CLerk of the HOuse saw the e-mails in question. Yet Hastert says they didn't. Who are we to believe? And better yet, how are we going to pin this one on the press and their suspicious timing? On that front it looks like CREW was trying to get someone to authenticate the e-mails and IM's quite a while ago...of course they probably timed that because they know how slow Republican-style bureacracy operates and timed their release months ago to precisely coincide with a release on Friday, September 29th.
Comment Posted By flounder On 1.10.2006 @ 10:44
Maybe Hastert was so busy working on his next real estate project that he "honestly" forgot that someone told him there was sexual predator running around in his cockus.
Comment Posted By flounder On 30.09.2006 @ 21:51
Hey Moran,
In reading Hastert's statement, read the following:The Clerk asked to see the text of the email. Congressman Alexander's office declined citing the fact that the family wished to maintain as much privacy as possible and simply wanted the contact to stop. The Clerk asked if the email exchange was of a sexual nature and was assured it was not. Congressman Alexander's Chief of Staff characterized the email exchange as over-friendly.
Anyways, since you have such an astute political mind, I was wondering if you could enlighten me as to difference between something "of a sexual nature" and something that is "over-friendly"?
Comment Posted By flounder On 30.09.2006 @ 20:47
